Suppr超能文献

直接前路全髋关节置换术中的囊袋管理:一项随机、单盲、对照试验。

Capsular Management in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2836-2842. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.048. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The direct anterior approach (DAA) is a popular approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Unlike the posterior approach, the importance of anterior capsular management is unknown. This randomized controlled trial compares capsular repair versus capsulectomy.

METHODS

This single-surgeon, single-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial occurred between 2013 and 2016. Patients undergoing unilateral, primary THA for osteoarthritis consented to undergo blinded, simple randomization to anterior capsulotomy with repair or anterior capsulectomy. Primary outcome measures included hip range of motion, hip flexion strength, and pain with seated hip flexion. Secondary outcome measures included surgical time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, and hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. Data were prospectively collected intraoperatively, six weeks, six months, an average of over 5 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients were ultimately enrolled in the trial; 50 received capsulectomy and 48 received capsulotomy. No significant differences were seen in preoperative demographics or in primary or secondary outcomes during this study. No difference was seen in pain at final follow-up at average > 5 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that capsular management in DAA THA does not affect postoperative pain or range of motion. The anterior capsule's role in prosthetic stability after DAA THA remains uncertain, but it does not currently appear that repair provides benefit and may lead to increased surgical time and blood loss. As such, capsular management in DAA THA is at surgeon discretion.

摘要

背景

直接前方入路(DAA)是全髋关节置换术(THA)的一种常用入路。与后入路不同,前囊管理的重要性尚不清楚。本随机对照试验比较了囊修复与囊切除术。

方法

这是一项由单名外科医生进行、单盲、平行组随机对照试验,于 2013 年至 2016 年进行。患有单侧、原发性骨关节炎的患者同意接受单侧、原发性 THA,接受盲法、简单随机分组,接受前囊切开术伴修复或前囊切除术。主要结局指标包括髋关节活动范围、髋关节屈曲力量和坐位髋关节屈曲时的疼痛。次要结局指标包括手术时间、估计失血量、术后并发症以及髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分。数据在术中、术后 6 周、6 个月以及平均超过 5 年后前瞻性收集。

结果

最终有 98 名患者入组该试验;50 名患者接受了囊切除术,48 名患者接受了囊切开术。在这项研究中,术前人口统计学数据或主要和次要结局均无显著差异。在平均>5 年的术后最终随访时,疼痛也没有差异。

结论

本研究表明,DAA-THA 中的囊管理不会影响术后疼痛或活动范围。DAA-THA 后,前囊在假体稳定性中的作用仍不确定,但目前看来,修复并不能提供益处,反而可能导致手术时间和失血量增加。因此,DAA-THA 中的囊管理取决于外科医生的判断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验