Tanya Stuti M, He Bonnie, Tang Janet, He Philip, Zhang Angela, Sharma Evan, Sharma Sanjay
Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, N.L.
Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
Can J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;57(3):188-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
H-index has historically functioned as a metric of academic success for acquisition of research grants, awards, and faculty appointments. Our objective was to characterize the landscape of Canadian academic ophthalmology on the basis of research productivity and impact-as measured by H-index-with gender, subspecialty, and faculty appointment.
Cross-sectional study based on data abstracted from publicly available databases.
Academic ophthalmologists from all schools in Canada with an ophthalmology residency program.
Academic ophthalmologists and their faculty appointments were identified from university websites. gender was determined from available provincial College of Physicians and Surgeons or ophthalmology society databases. H-indices were collected from Scopus and Web of Science. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate statistics were used to analyze the relationship of H-index with gender, faculty appointment, and subspecialty.
We included data from 696 academic ophthalmologists. The mean H-indices for lecturers and assistant, associate, and full professors were 4.0 (±5.6), 5.6 (±5.0), 8.8 (±6.3), and 15 (±12), respectively. H-index had a significant positive correlation with faculty appointment (0.521, 95% confidence interval 0.469-0.579, p = 1.77e-41). The mean H-index was 6.7 (±8.2) for women and 8.1(±8.4) for men (p = 0.0635). Women comprised 27% of faculty positions, and men were more likely to have a higher faculty appointment than women (p = 0.0073). The top subspecialties for underrepresentation of women were surgical retina, medical retina, and oculoplastics.
Faculty appointments are associated with research productivity, as measured by H-index. There are significant gender disparities in faculty appointments and subspecialty representation. Future directions include exploring other contributory factors to success in academic ophthalmology.
H指数一直以来都被用作衡量在获得研究基金、奖项和教职任命方面学术成就的指标。我们的目的是基于研究生产力和影响力(以H指数衡量),按性别、亚专业和教职任命来描述加拿大学术眼科的概况。
基于从公开可用数据库提取的数据进行的横断面研究。
加拿大所有设有眼科住院医师培训项目的学校中的学术眼科医生。
从大学网站上识别学术眼科医生及其教职任命情况。通过省级医师和外科医生学院或眼科学会的可用数据库确定性别。从Scopus和科学网收集H指数。使用描述性、单变量和多变量统计分析H指数与性别、教职任命和亚专业之间的关系。
我们纳入了696名学术眼科医生的数据。讲师以及助理教授、副教授和正教授的平均H指数分别为4.0(±5.6)、5.6(±5.0)、8.8(±6.3)和15(±12)。H指数与教职任命呈显著正相关(0.521,95%置信区间0.469 - 0.579,p = 1.77e - 41)。女性的平均H指数为6.7(±8.2),男性为8.1(±8.4)(p = 0.0635)。女性占教职岗位的27%,男性比女性更有可能获得更高的教职任命(p = 0.0073)。女性代表性不足的前几个亚专业是视网膜手术、视网膜内科和眼整形。
如通过H指数衡量,教职任命与研究生产力相关。在教职任命和亚专业代表性方面存在显著的性别差异。未来的方向包括探索学术眼科成功的其他促成因素。