Suppr超能文献

心脏再同步治疗使用起搏器或除颤器:患者选择和证据支持。

Cardiac resynchronization therapy using a pacemaker or a defibrillator: Patient selection and evidence to support it.

机构信息

Heart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.

Heart and Vascular Institute at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.

出版信息

Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 May-Jun;66:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for patients with heart failure (HF), myocardial dysfunction and prolonged ventricular depolarization on surface electrocardiogram. CRT can be delivered by a pacemaker (CRT-P) or a combined pacemaker-defibrillator (CRT-D). Although these two types of devices are very different in size, function, and cost, current published guidelines do not distinguish between them, leaving the choice of which device to implant to the treating physician and the informed patient. In this paper, we review the published CRT clinical trial literature with focus on the outcomes of HF patients treated with CRT-P versus CRT-D. We also attempt to provide guidance as to the appropriate choice of CRT device type, in the absence of randomized prospective trials geared to answer this specific question.

摘要

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)是心力衰竭(HF)、心肌功能障碍和体表心电图上心室去极化延长患者的既定治疗方法。CRT 可通过起搏器(CRT-P)或心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)提供。尽管这两种类型的设备在尺寸、功能和成本上有很大的不同,但目前发布的指南并没有对它们进行区分,而是将选择植入哪种设备的权利留给治疗医生和知情患者。在本文中,我们回顾了已发表的 CRT 临床试验文献,重点关注接受 CRT-P 与 CRT-D 治疗的 HF 患者的结局。在缺乏针对这一特定问题的随机前瞻性试验的情况下,我们还试图就 CRT 设备类型的适当选择提供指导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验