Transfusion Medicine Department, Hemovida, Lisbon, Portugal.
Transfusion Medicine Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jan-Dec;27:10760296211003984. doi: 10.1177/10760296211003984.
We aimed to determine how Portuguese physicians handle major bleeding. We also aim to establish global diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations to be followed in clinical practice by using a step-wise approach of evidence generation. This study followed a three-step process: a steering committee desk review, a Delphi technique, an expert panel meeting. A modified 3-round Delphi including 31 statements was performed. Questions were answered in a five-point Likert-type scale. Consensus threshold was established as a percentage of agreement among participants ≥90% in the first round, and ≥85% in the second and third rounds. The level of consensus achieved by panelists was discussed with the scientific committee (January-2020). Fifty-one physicians participated in the study (compliance rate >90%). Analyzing the three rounds, consensus was reached on 20 items (64.5%) in the first, 4/11 items (36.4%) in the second and 6/7 items (85.7%) in the third. One statement about administration of clotting factor concentrates for bleeding control did not reach consensus. A high level of consensus was reached toward the need for implementing Patient Blood Management strategies in Portuguese hospitals, reduce exposure to allogeneic blood components, to use goal directed therapies for acquired bleeding management, and the need for evaluating blood transfusion indirect costs. A final version with 12 recommendations was built, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Our results provide critically appraised and updated evidence on bleeding coagulopathies management in Portugal. Additional studies, mainly about indirect costs of blood transfusion, are needed.
我们旨在确定葡萄牙医生如何处理大出血。我们还旨在通过逐步生成证据的方法,制定全球诊断和治疗建议,以便在临床实践中遵循。这项研究遵循三个步骤:指导委员会的桌面审查、德尔菲技术、专家小组会议。进行了一项改良的 3 轮德尔菲法,其中包括 31 项声明。问题以 5 点李克特量表回答。共识阈值设定为参与者在第一轮中达成 ≥90%的协议百分比,在第二轮和第三轮中达成 ≥85%的协议百分比。与科学委员会(2020 年 1 月)讨论了专家小组达成的共识水平。51 名医生参与了这项研究(合规率>90%)。分析三轮,第一轮达成共识的有 20 项(64.5%),第二轮达成共识的有 4/11 项(36.4%),第三轮达成共识的有 6/7 项(85.7%)。关于给予凝血因子浓缩物控制出血的一项声明未达成共识。对于在葡萄牙医院实施患者血液管理策略、减少异体血液成分暴露、使用靶向治疗获得性出血管理以及评估输血间接成本的必要性,达成了高度共识。根据推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE),最终制定了包含 12 项建议的最终版本。我们的结果提供了对葡萄牙出血性凝血障碍管理的批判性评估和更新证据。需要进行更多研究,主要是关于输血的间接成本。