Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California.
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California.
Health Commun. 2022 Nov;37(13):1650-1660. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1912890. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
Individuals with social anxiety disorder (iSAD) experience adverse outcomes in daily life due to the disorder (e.g., lower educational and work achievement compared to their healthy counterparts). They are prone to social isolation, even though they desire intimate interpersonal relationships. Yet, little research on iSAD is devoted to understanding in detail a) when they interpret social situations as social-anxiety-provoking, b) how this interpretation motivates their assessments of their efficacy and likely interaction outcomes, and c) how they choose specific information-seeking strategies in uncertain social situations. Leveraging the theory of motivated information management (TMIM) and the emotional systems (ES) model, we explored the lived experiences of iSAD. We conducted in-depth interviews ( = 27) and analyzed them using thematic analysis. iSAD perceived discrepancies in a) mutual goals, b) common ground, and c) self-image as social-anxiety-provoking. These interpretations motivated their assessments of a) socializing benefits, b) communication competency, and c) interactant partner's amiability, which led to a mix of information-seeking decisions in social situations. Practical and theoretical implications for future research are discussed.
社交焦虑障碍患者(iSAD)由于该障碍在日常生活中会经历不良后果(例如,与健康对照组相比,教育和工作成就较低)。他们容易社交孤立,尽管他们渴望亲密的人际关系。然而,很少有研究致力于详细了解 a)当他们将社交情境解释为引起社交焦虑时,b)这种解释如何激发他们对自身效能和可能的互动结果的评估,以及 c)他们如何在不确定的社交情境中选择特定的信息寻求策略。利用动机信息管理理论(TMIM)和情绪系统(ES)模型,我们探讨了 iSAD 的生活体验。我们进行了深入的访谈(n=27),并使用主题分析进行了分析。iSAD 将以下方面的差异感知为引起社交焦虑的因素:a)共同目标,b)共同基础,和 c)自我形象。这些解释激发了他们对以下方面的评估:a)社交收益,b)沟通能力,和 c)互动伙伴的友善性,这导致了他们在社交情境中混合了信息寻求决策。讨论了对未来研究的实际和理论意义。