Innovation Studio, Kaiser Permanente, Tustin, CA, USA.
West Health Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
J Telemed Telecare. 2023 Aug;29(7):566-575. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211004321. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
The global pandemic has raised awareness of the need for alternative ways to deliver care, notably telehealth. Prior to this study, research has been mixed on its effectiveness and impact on downstream utilization, especially for seniors. Our multi-institution study of more than 300,000 telehealth visits for seniors evaluates the clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization for urgent and non-emergent symptoms.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study from November 2015 to March 2019, leveraging different models of telehealth from three health systems, comparing them to in-person visits for urgent and non-emergent needs of seniors based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition diagnoses. The study population was adults aged 60 years or older who had access to telehealth and were affiliated with and resided in the geographic region of the healthcare organization providing telehealth. The primary outcomes of interest were visit resolution and episodes of care for those that required follow-up.
In total, 313,516 telehealth visits were analysed across three healthcare organizations. Telehealth encounters were successful in resolving urgent and non-emergent needs in 84.0-86.7% of cases. When visits required follow-up, over 95% were resolved in less than three visits for both telehealth and in-person cohorts.
While in-person visits have traditionally been the gold standard, our results suggest that when deployed within the confines of a patient's existing primary care and health system provider, telehealth can be an effective alternative to in-person care for urgent and non-emergent needs of seniors without increasing downstream utilization.
全球大流行使人们意识到需要寻找替代方式来提供医疗服务,尤其是远程医疗。在此项研究之前,有关远程医疗的有效性及其对后续利用的影响的研究结果不一,尤其是针对老年人。我们对超过 30 万名老年人的远程医疗访问进行了多机构研究,评估了紧急和非紧急症状的临床结果和医疗保健利用情况。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,时间跨度为 2015 年 11 月至 2019 年 3 月,利用三个医疗系统的不同远程医疗模式,根据国际疾病分类第 10 版诊断,将其与老年人的紧急和非紧急需求的面对面就诊进行比较。研究人群为年龄在 60 岁及以上、有远程医疗就诊条件且在提供远程医疗的医疗组织所在地有医疗关系并居住在该地区的成年人。主要研究结果是对那些需要随访的就诊的就诊解决情况和护理过程。
在三个医疗组织中,共分析了 313516 次远程医疗访问。在 84.0%-86.7%的情况下,远程医疗能够成功解决紧急和非紧急需求。当需要随访时,无论是远程医疗还是面对面就诊,超过 95%的患者在三次就诊内得到解决。
虽然面对面就诊一直是金标准,但我们的结果表明,在患者现有的初级保健和医疗系统提供者的范围内部署时,远程医疗可以作为老年人紧急和非紧急需求的有效替代方式,而不会增加后续利用。