Eryasar Arzu Sonmez, Kilinc Ahmet
Igdır University, Igdır, Turkey.
Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(1):123-147. doi: 10.1007/s11191-021-00200-7. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
The purpose of the present study was to understand the nature of the link between science teachers' epistemologies and their socioscientific issue (SSI) teaching discourse. It is important to consider this link due to the limitations of science teachers in shifting from monologic to more dialogic orientations in their teaching, despite SSI-based science education reforms in many countries. Teachers' epistemologies are likely to contribute to the difficulties experienced in this shift. We selected three science teachers using purposive sampling procedures. Using classroom observations and follow-up constructivism-oriented interviews, we selected one non-constructivist, one moderately constructivist, and one constructivist science teacher. We then examined these teachers' (knowledge-based and science-based) epistemologies by two semi-structured interviews. The teachers taught one SSI topic and then we conducted classroom observations. Benefiting from highly used classifications, we classified teachers' epistemologies and discourses in the transcripts. The results showed that there were some coherences and incoherences between science teachers' epistemologies and their SSI teaching.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11191-021-00200-7.
本研究的目的是了解科学教师的认识论与其社会科学问题(SSI)教学话语之间联系的本质。鉴于尽管许多国家都进行了基于SSI的科学教育改革,但科学教师在教学中从独白式转向更具对话式取向存在局限性,考虑这种联系很重要。教师的认识论可能导致这种转变中遇到的困难。我们采用目的抽样程序选择了三位科学教师。通过课堂观察和后续以建构主义为导向的访谈,我们选择了一位非建构主义、一位适度建构主义和一位建构主义科学教师。然后,我们通过两次半结构化访谈考察了这些教师(基于知识和基于科学)的认识论。教师们讲授了一个SSI主题,然后我们进行了课堂观察。受益于广泛使用的分类方法,我们在成绩单中对教师的认识论和话语进行了分类。结果表明,科学教师的认识论与其SSI教学之间存在一些一致性和不一致性。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11191-021-00200-7获取的补充材料。