• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Application of Copy Number Variation Detection to Fetal Diagnosis of Echogenic Intracardiac Focus During Pregnancy.拷贝数变异检测在孕期胎儿心脏强回声光斑诊断中的应用。
Front Genet. 2021 Mar 26;12:626044. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.626044. eCollection 2021.
2
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #57: Evaluation and management of isolated soft ultrasound markers for aneuploidy in the second trimester: (Replaces Consults #10, Single umbilical artery, October 2010; #16, Isolated echogenic bowel diagnosed on second-trimester ultrasound, August 2011; #17, Evaluation and management of isolated renal pelviectasis on second-trimester ultrasound, December 2011; #25, Isolated fetal choroid plexus cysts, April 2013; #27, Isolated echogenic intracardiac focus, August 2013).母胎医学会咨询系列第 57 号:中孕期单纯性软指标超声标记物用于染色体非整倍体的评估与管理:(取代咨询 10 号:单脐动脉,2010 年 10 月;咨询 16 号:中孕期超声诊断孤立性肠回声增强,2011 年 8 月;咨询 17 号:中孕期超声检查孤立性肾盂扩张的评估与管理,2011 年 12 月;咨询 25 号:孤立性胎儿脉络丛囊肿,2013 年 4 月;咨询 27 号:孤立性心内强回声灶,2013 年 8 月)。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):B2-B15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.079. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
3
Echogenic intracardiac foci and fetal cardiac anomalies: A review of cases from a tertiary care center in China.心内强回声灶与胎儿心脏异常:来自中国一家三级护理中心的病例回顾
J Clin Ultrasound. 2018 Feb;46(2):103-107. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22533. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
4
Effectiveness of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Echogenic Intracardiac Focus: A Single-Center Experience.染色体微阵列分析在胎儿心内强回声光斑产前诊断中的有效性:单中心经验
Int J Gen Med. 2021 May 21;14:1991-1997. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S311800. eCollection 2021.
5
Chromosomal microarray analysis for the detection of chromosome abnormalities in fetuses with echogenic intracardiac focus in women without high-risk factors.在无高危因素的女性中,采用染色体微阵列分析检测胎儿心内强回声灶中的染色体异常。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(5):e19014. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019014.
6
Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in 2466 fetuses with ultrasonographic soft markers: a prospective cohort study.2466 例超声软指标胎儿的产前染色体微阵列分析:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;224(5):516.e1-516.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.039. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with isolated ultrasound soft markers in pregnant women not of advanced maternal age.鉴定非高龄孕妇中超声软指标异常胎儿的拷贝数变异。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Feb 10;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03066-4.
8
Association of prenatal renal ultrasound abnormalities with pathogenic copy number variants in a large Chinese cohort.中国一个大型队列中产前肾脏超声异常与致病性拷贝数变异的关联
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;59(2):226-233. doi: 10.1002/uog.23702.
9
How important is a cardiac echogenic focus in a routine fetal examination?在常规胎儿检查中,心脏强回声光斑有多重要?
Rev Port Cardiol. 2004 Mar;23(3):459-61.
10
[Application of single nucleotide polymorphism array in prenatal diagnosis for fetuses with abnormal ultrasound findings].单核苷酸多态性阵列在超声检查异常胎儿产前诊断中的应用
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 25;53(7):464-470. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2018.07.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Echogenic intracardiac foci detection and location in the second-trimester ultrasound and association with fetal outcomes: A systematic literature review.中孕期超声检测心内强回声灶的位置与胎儿结局的关系:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 22;19(4):e0298365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298365. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics and mode of inheritance of pathogenic copy number variants in prenatal diagnosis.产前诊断中致病性拷贝数变异的特征和遗传模式。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;221(5):493.e1-493.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
2
[Expert consensus on the application of low-depth whole genome sequencing in prenatal diagnosis].《低深度全基因组测序在产前诊断中应用的专家共识》
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 10;36(4):293-296. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2019.04.001.
3
Intracardiac echogenic focus and its location: association with congenital heart defects.心内强回声灶及其位置:与先天性心脏缺陷的关联
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Sep;32(18):3074-3078. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1558200. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
4
Population-based trends in invasive prenatal diagnosis for ultrasound-based indications: two decades of change from 1994 to 2016.基于人群的超声指征下侵袭性产前诊断的趋势:1994 年至 2016 年二十年的变化。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):503-511. doi: 10.1002/uog.19107.
5
Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with ultrasound soft markers using next-generation sequencing.应用下一代测序技术鉴定超声软指标胎儿的拷贝数变异。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 25;8(1):8134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26555-6.
6
Echogenic intracardiac foci and fetal cardiac anomalies: A review of cases from a tertiary care center in China.心内强回声灶与胎儿心脏异常:来自中国一家三级护理中心的病例回顾
J Clin Ultrasound. 2018 Feb;46(2):103-107. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22533. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
7
The natural history of fetal diagnosed isolated ventricular septal defect.胎儿诊断孤立性室间隔缺损的自然史。
Prenat Diagn. 2017 Sep;37(9):889-893. doi: 10.1002/pd.5100. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
8
Meta-analysis of validity of echogenic intracardiac foci for calculating the risk of Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy.妊娠中期超声心动图心内强回声灶用于计算唐氏综合征风险的有效性的Meta分析。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;56(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.11.002.
9
Committee Opinion No.682: Microarrays and Next-Generation Sequencing Technology: The Use of Advanced Genetic Diagnostic Tools in Obstetrics and Gynecology.委员会意见 No.682:微阵列和下一代测序技术:在妇产科中使用先进的遗传诊断工具。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):e262-e268. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001817.
10
The use of chromosomal microarray for prenatal diagnosis.染色体微阵列在产前诊断中的应用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):B2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

拷贝数变异检测在孕期胎儿心脏强回声光斑诊断中的应用。

Application of Copy Number Variation Detection to Fetal Diagnosis of Echogenic Intracardiac Focus During Pregnancy.

作者信息

Song Yaxian, Xu Jingjing, Li Hongmiao, Gao Jiong, Wu Limin, He Guoping, Liu Wen, Hu Yue, Peng Yaqin, Yang Fang, Jiang Xiaohua, Wang Jing

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.

Clinical Laboratory of Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) Health, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2021 Mar 26;12:626044. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.626044. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fgene.2021.626044
PMID:33868367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8047624/
Abstract

Echogenic intracardiac focus (EIF) is one of the most common ultrasound soft markers (USMs) in prenatal screening. However, the association of EIF with chromosomal abnormalities is still controversial. From January 2018 to April 2020, a total of 571 fetuses with USMs in our center were enrolled, among which 150 (26.27%) presented EIFs. We analyzed the karyotype anomalies and copy number variations (CNVs) in fetuses who presented EIFs by comparing their ultrasound indications, maternal ages and gestational stages. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities between fetuses with EIFs and the fetuses with USMs (4.00 vs. 7.71%, = 0.112). Additionally, the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities was not related to maternal age (4.10% in maternal age below 35 yeas vs. 3.57% in maternal age above 35, = 1.000). Interestingly, after 28 weeks of gestation, fetuses with EIFs showed more chromosomal abnormalities (20.00%) than that in the group before 28 weeks of gestation (2.22%, = 0.014), and this result was attributed to the detection of pathogenic CNVs. After birth, 25 of children conducted cardiac development re-examination. Among them, 9 (36%, 9/25) were diagnosed with congenital heart disease, primarily patent foramen oval and ventricular septal defects (7/9, 77.77%). We concluded that the appearance of EIFs in early or mid-trimester would not indicate an increased risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. However, the persistence of EIFs in late trimester was associated with a higher risk of pathology-related CNVs and its persistent appearance may indicate heart development defects after birth. Thus, our results suggest that CNV detection has its advantages in prenatal diagnosis, especially for those with EIFs that persist in the third trimester.

摘要

心内强回声光斑(EIF)是产前筛查中最常见的超声软指标(USM)之一。然而,EIF与染色体异常的关联仍存在争议。2018年1月至2020年4月,本中心共纳入571例有超声软指标的胎儿,其中150例(26.27%)出现EIF。我们通过比较胎儿的超声指征、母亲年龄和孕周,分析了出现EIF的胎儿的核型异常和拷贝数变异(CNV)。出现EIF的胎儿与有超声软指标的胎儿之间染色体异常的发生率无统计学显著差异(4.00%对7.71%,P = 0.112)。此外,染色体异常的发生率与母亲年龄无关(母亲年龄低于35岁者为4.10%,母亲年龄高于35岁者为3.57%,P = 1.000)。有趣的是,妊娠28周后,出现EIF的胎儿染色体异常发生率(20.00%)高于妊娠28周前的组(2.22%,P = 0.014),这一结果归因于致病性CNV的检测。出生后,对25名儿童进行了心脏发育复查。其中9例(36%,9/25)被诊断为先天性心脏病,主要为卵圆孔未闭和室间隔缺损(7/9,77.77%)。我们得出结论,孕早期或孕中期出现EIF并不表明胎儿染色体异常风险增加。然而,孕晚期EIF持续存在与病理相关CNV的较高风险相关,其持续出现可能表明出生后心脏发育缺陷。因此,我们的结果表明,CNV检测在产前诊断中具有优势,特别是对于那些在孕晚期持续存在EIF的情况。