Song Yaxian, Xu Jingjing, Li Hongmiao, Gao Jiong, Wu Limin, He Guoping, Liu Wen, Hu Yue, Peng Yaqin, Yang Fang, Jiang Xiaohua, Wang Jing
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Clinical Laboratory of Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) Health, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Front Genet. 2021 Mar 26;12:626044. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.626044. eCollection 2021.
Echogenic intracardiac focus (EIF) is one of the most common ultrasound soft markers (USMs) in prenatal screening. However, the association of EIF with chromosomal abnormalities is still controversial. From January 2018 to April 2020, a total of 571 fetuses with USMs in our center were enrolled, among which 150 (26.27%) presented EIFs. We analyzed the karyotype anomalies and copy number variations (CNVs) in fetuses who presented EIFs by comparing their ultrasound indications, maternal ages and gestational stages. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities between fetuses with EIFs and the fetuses with USMs (4.00 vs. 7.71%, = 0.112). Additionally, the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities was not related to maternal age (4.10% in maternal age below 35 yeas vs. 3.57% in maternal age above 35, = 1.000). Interestingly, after 28 weeks of gestation, fetuses with EIFs showed more chromosomal abnormalities (20.00%) than that in the group before 28 weeks of gestation (2.22%, = 0.014), and this result was attributed to the detection of pathogenic CNVs. After birth, 25 of children conducted cardiac development re-examination. Among them, 9 (36%, 9/25) were diagnosed with congenital heart disease, primarily patent foramen oval and ventricular septal defects (7/9, 77.77%). We concluded that the appearance of EIFs in early or mid-trimester would not indicate an increased risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. However, the persistence of EIFs in late trimester was associated with a higher risk of pathology-related CNVs and its persistent appearance may indicate heart development defects after birth. Thus, our results suggest that CNV detection has its advantages in prenatal diagnosis, especially for those with EIFs that persist in the third trimester.
心内强回声光斑(EIF)是产前筛查中最常见的超声软指标(USM)之一。然而,EIF与染色体异常的关联仍存在争议。2018年1月至2020年4月,本中心共纳入571例有超声软指标的胎儿,其中150例(26.27%)出现EIF。我们通过比较胎儿的超声指征、母亲年龄和孕周,分析了出现EIF的胎儿的核型异常和拷贝数变异(CNV)。出现EIF的胎儿与有超声软指标的胎儿之间染色体异常的发生率无统计学显著差异(4.00%对7.71%,P = 0.112)。此外,染色体异常的发生率与母亲年龄无关(母亲年龄低于35岁者为4.10%,母亲年龄高于35岁者为3.57%,P = 1.000)。有趣的是,妊娠28周后,出现EIF的胎儿染色体异常发生率(20.00%)高于妊娠28周前的组(2.22%,P = 0.014),这一结果归因于致病性CNV的检测。出生后,对25名儿童进行了心脏发育复查。其中9例(36%,9/25)被诊断为先天性心脏病,主要为卵圆孔未闭和室间隔缺损(7/9,77.77%)。我们得出结论,孕早期或孕中期出现EIF并不表明胎儿染色体异常风险增加。然而,孕晚期EIF持续存在与病理相关CNV的较高风险相关,其持续出现可能表明出生后心脏发育缺陷。因此,我们的结果表明,CNV检测在产前诊断中具有优势,特别是对于那些在孕晚期持续存在EIF的情况。