• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的超声指征下侵袭性产前诊断的趋势:1994 年至 2016 年二十年的变化。

Population-based trends in invasive prenatal diagnosis for ultrasound-based indications: two decades of change from 1994 to 2016.

机构信息

MD Undergraduate Program, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada.

Reproductive Epidemiology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):503-511. doi: 10.1002/uog.19107.

DOI:10.1002/uog.19107
PMID:29877030
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess trends in ultrasound-indicated prenatal diagnostic testing performed over the past two decades in the Australian state of Victoria, in the context of rapidly changing practices in aneuploidy screening and chromosome analysis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of all ultrasound-indicated prenatal diagnostic testing (amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling) performed in the state of Victoria between 1994 and 2016. Ultrasound indications for testing included: fetal structural abnormality, fetal death, fetal growth restriction, abnormal amniotic fluid volume, genetic 'soft marker' and unspecified ultrasound abnormality. Maternal age, indication for testing, type of diagnostic procedure, gestational age, type of chromosome analysis (G-banded karyotyping or chromosomal microarray (CMA)) and test results were obtained. Diagnostic yield (i.e. percentage of tests yielding a major abnormality) was analyzed by year, maternal age and gestational age. Statistical analysis was performed using the χ tests for trend or difference in proportions, as appropriate.

RESULTS

During the 23-year study period, 1 533 317 births were recorded and 16 152 diagnostic procedures were performed for the primary indication of ultrasound abnormality. In recent years, ultrasound abnormality became the most common indication for prenatal invasive testing (29.4% of diagnostic tests between 2013 and 2016) due to a steep decline in testing for other indications such as positive result on combined first-trimester screening or advanced maternal age alone. In 2016, over 95% of ultrasound-indicated procedures were performed with CMA; among these, pathogenic copy number variant (CNV) was the most common (3.5%) abnormality detected, followed by trisomy 21 (2.8%). The diagnostic yield of ultrasound-indicated tests performed < 16 weeks was significantly higher than that of tests performed after 20 weeks (31.5% vs 9.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-indicated invasive testing is contributing to prenatal diagnosis in new ways in the genomic era. A pathogenic CNV is now the most likely diagnosis after ultrasound-indicated testing, rather than trisomy 21 or other whole-chromosome aneuploidy. Despite steady improvements in first-trimester screening for aneuploidy, the diagnostic yield of ultrasound-indicated tests > 20 weeks has remained stable due to increased utilization of CMA. Procedures performed for structural abnormalities < 16 weeks continue to have the highest diagnostic yield, supporting the benefits of early fetal structural assessment at 11-13 weeks. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

摘要

目的

评估过去二十年在澳大利亚维多利亚州进行的超声指示性产前诊断检测的趋势,该检测在非整倍体筛查和染色体分析的快速变化背景下进行。

方法

这是一项对 1994 年至 2016 年期间在维多利亚州进行的所有超声指示性产前诊断检测(羊膜穿刺术和绒毛膜活检)的回顾性分析。检测的超声指征包括:胎儿结构异常、胎儿死亡、胎儿生长受限、羊水体积异常、遗传“软标记”和未指定的超声异常。获得了母亲年龄、检测指征、诊断程序类型、孕龄、染色体分析类型(G 带核型分析或染色体微阵列(CMA))和检测结果。按年份、母亲年龄和孕龄分析诊断产率(即产生主要异常的测试百分比)。适当使用 χ 检验进行趋势或比例差异分析。

结果

在 23 年的研究期间,记录了 1533317 例分娩,有 16152 例诊断程序因超声异常的主要指征进行。近年来,由于其他指征(如联合早孕期筛查阳性结果或高龄产妇)的检测急剧下降,超声异常成为产前侵袭性检测最常见的指征(2013 年至 2016 年期间占诊断检测的 29.4%)。2016 年,超过 95%的超声指示性操作采用 CMA 进行;在这些操作中,致病性拷贝数变异(CNV)是最常见(3.5%)的异常,其次是 21 三体(2.8%)。孕龄<16 周进行的超声指示性检测的诊断产率明显高于孕龄>20 周进行的检测(31.5%比 9.0%)。

结论

在基因组时代,超声指示性侵袭性检测正以新的方式为产前诊断做出贡献。在超声指示性检测后,致病性 CNV 现在是最有可能的诊断,而不是 21 三体或其他全染色体非整倍体。尽管唐氏综合征的早孕期筛查稳步改善,但由于 CMA 的应用增加,孕龄>20 周的超声指示性检测的诊断产率仍保持稳定。<16 周进行的结构异常操作继续具有最高的诊断产率,支持在 11-13 周时进行早期胎儿结构评估的益处。版权所有©2018 ISUOG。由 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 出版。

相似文献

1
Population-based trends in invasive prenatal diagnosis for ultrasound-based indications: two decades of change from 1994 to 2016.基于人群的超声指征下侵袭性产前诊断的趋势:1994 年至 2016 年二十年的变化。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):503-511. doi: 10.1002/uog.19107.
2
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠胎儿非整倍体的产前筛查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.
3
Chromosomal microarray as primary diagnostic genomic tool for pregnancies at increased risk within a population-based combined first-trimester screening program.在基于人群的联合早孕期筛查计划中,对于高危妊娠,染色体微阵列作为主要的诊断性基因组工具。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):480-486. doi: 10.1002/uog.17548. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
4
Prospective chromosome analysis of 3429 amniocentesis samples in China using copy number variation sequencing.使用拷贝数变异测序对中国 3429 例羊水穿刺样本进行前瞻性染色体分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Sep;219(3):287.e1-287.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 May 29.
5
Prenatal screening for and diagnosis of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies.双胎妊娠非整倍体的产前筛查与诊断
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):754-67.
6
Prenatal diagnostic testing and atypical chromosome abnormalities following combined first-trimester screening: implications for contingent models of non-invasive prenatal testing.产前诊断检测与联合早孕期筛查后的非典型染色体异常:对非侵入性产前检测的条件模型的影响。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):487-492. doi: 10.1002/uog.18979.
7
The impact of first trimester screening and early fetal anomaly scan on invasive testing rates in women with advanced maternal age.高龄产妇中,早孕期筛查和早孕期胎儿异常扫描对有创性检测率的影响。
Ultraschall Med. 2011 Jun;32(3):302-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245560. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
8
Microarray and RASopathy-disorder testing in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency.超声检查胎儿颈项透明层增厚与微阵列芯片和 RAS 相关疾病检测。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;55(3):383-390. doi: 10.1002/uog.20352.
9
Population-based trends in prenatal screening and diagnosis for aneuploidy: a retrospective analysis of 38 years of state-wide data.基于人群的非整倍体产前筛查和诊断趋势:对 38 年全州范围数据的回顾性分析。
BJOG. 2016 Jan;123(1):90-7. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13488. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
10
Positive predictive value estimates for cell-free noninvasive prenatal screening from data of a large referral genetic diagnostic laboratory.基于大型转诊基因诊断实验室数据的无细胞非侵入性产前筛查的阳性预测值估计
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;217(6):691.e1-691.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic and prognostic role of soft ultrasound markers in prenatal detection and assessment of foetal abnormalities.软超声标志物在胎儿异常产前检测与评估中的诊断及预后作用
Prz Menopauzalny. 2024 Jun;23(2):94-108. doi: 10.5114/pm.2024.141092. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
2
Association between chromosome abnormities and prenatal diagnosis indicators screening in the second trimester of pregnancy.染色体异常与妊娠中期产前诊断指标筛查的相关性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 1;102(35):e34762. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034762.
3
Case report: Prenatal diagnosis of rare chromosome mosaicism: discordant results between chorionic villi and amniotic fluid samples.
病例报告:罕见染色体嵌合体的产前诊断——绒毛膜绒毛样本与羊水样本结果不一致
Front Genet. 2023 Jun 5;14:1165019. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1165019. eCollection 2023.
4
Current Perspectives of Prenatal Cell-free DNA Screening in Clinical Management of First-Trimester Septated Cystic Hygroma.孕早期分隔性囊状水囊瘤临床管理中产前游离DNA筛查的现状
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Oct 25;14:1499-1518. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S328201. eCollection 2022.
5
Single nucleotide polymorphism array in genetic evaluation of fetal ultrasound abnormalities: a retrospective follow-up study.单核苷酸多态性阵列在胎儿超声异常基因评估中的应用:一项回顾性随访研究
Am J Transl Res. 2022 May 15;14(5):3516-3524. eCollection 2022.
6
Application of Copy Number Variation Detection to Fetal Diagnosis of Echogenic Intracardiac Focus During Pregnancy.拷贝数变异检测在孕期胎儿心脏强回声光斑诊断中的应用。
Front Genet. 2021 Mar 26;12:626044. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.626044. eCollection 2021.
7
The 100 most-cited articles on prenatal diagnosis: A bibliometric analysis.产前诊断领域被引用次数最多的100篇文章:一项文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(38):e17236. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017236.