Klupp Fee, Sass Malte, Bergmann Frank, Khajeh Elias, Ghamarnejad Omid, Hassenpflug Matthias, Mehrabi Arianeb, Kulu Yakup
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Asklepios Hospital, D-21075 Hamburg, Germany.
Oncol Lett. 2021 Jun;21(6):448. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12709. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
Up to 50% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) have either synchronous or metachronous hepatic metastases in the course of their disease. Patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) whose tumors express wild-type KRAS benefit from treatment with monoclonal antibodies (such as cetuximab or panitumumab) that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, the therapeutic response to these antibodies is variable, and further predictive models are required. The present study examined whether expression of different EGFRs or their ligands in tumors was associated with the response to cetuximab treatment. Tumor tissues, collected during liver resection in 28 patients with mCRC, were analyzed. The protein expression levels of EGFR/ErbB1, ErbB2, ErbB3 and the EGFR ligands heregulin and amphiregulin were determined using Luminex 200 and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed 4 weeks before and 6-8 weeks after treatment with cetuximab. Response to treatment was assessed using the response evaluation criteria for solid tumors (RECIST). The association between the protein expression levels of different EGFRs and their ligands with RECIST criteria was then analyzed to determine whether these protein levels could predict the treatment response to cetuximab. A total of 12 patients exhibited a partial response, 9 exhibited stable disease and 7 exhibited progressive disease after cetuximab therapy according to RECIST. The expression levels of EGFRs (EGFR/ErbB1, ErbB2 and ErbB3) and their ligands (heregulin and amphiregulin) were not significantly associated with the response to cetuximab therapy. Therefore, the present study indicated that EGFR or EGFR ligand expression did not predict treatment response in patients with CRC with liver metastases following cetuximab therapy.
高达50%的结直肠癌(CRC)患者在病程中会出现同时性或异时性肝转移。肿瘤表达野生型KRAS的转移性CRC(mCRC)患者可从靶向表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的单克隆抗体(如西妥昔单抗或帕尼单抗)治疗中获益。然而,这些抗体的治疗反应存在差异,需要进一步的预测模型。本研究检测了肿瘤中不同EGFR或其配体的表达是否与西妥昔单抗治疗反应相关。分析了28例mCRC患者肝切除术中收集的肿瘤组织。使用Luminex 200和酶联免疫吸附测定法测定EGFR/ErbB1、ErbB2、ErbB3以及EGFR配体神经调节蛋白和双调蛋白的蛋白表达水平。在西妥昔单抗治疗前4周和治疗后6 - 8周进行计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像。使用实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)评估治疗反应。然后分析不同EGFR及其配体的蛋白表达水平与RECIST标准之间的关联,以确定这些蛋白水平是否可以预测西妥昔单抗的治疗反应。根据RECIST标准,西妥昔单抗治疗后共有12例患者出现部分缓解,9例病情稳定,7例病情进展。EGFR(EGFR/ErbB1、ErbB2和ErbB3)及其配体(神经调节蛋白和双调蛋白)的表达水平与西妥昔单抗治疗反应无显著关联。因此,本研究表明,在西妥昔单抗治疗后的肝转移CRC患者中,EGFR或EGFR配体表达不能预测治疗反应。