• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于勾股概率犹豫模糊聚合信息的决策支持建模的EDAS方法

EDAS method for decision support modeling under the Pythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation information.

作者信息

Batool Bushra, Abosuliman Shougi Suliman, Abdullah Saleem, Ashraf Shahzaib

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.

Department of Transportation and Port Management, Faculty of Maritime Studies, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21588 Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2022;13(12):5491-5504. doi: 10.1007/s12652-021-03181-1. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1007/s12652-021-03181-1
PMID:33868508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8039808/
Abstract

The significance of emergency decision-making (EmDM) has been experienced recently due to the continuous occurrence of various emergency situations that have caused significant social and monetary misfortunes. EmDM assumes a manageable role when it is important to moderate property and live misfortunes and to reduce the negative effects on the social and natural turn of events. Genuine world EmDM issues are usually described as complex, time-consuming, lack of data, and the effect of mental practices that make it a challenging task for decision-makers. This article shows the need to manage the various types of vulnerabilities and to monitor practices to resolve these concerns. In clinical analysis, how to select an ideal drug from certain drugs with efficacy values for coronavirus disease has become a common problem these days. To address this issue, we are establishing a multi-attribute decision-making approach (MADMap) based on the EDAS method under Pythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information. In addition, an algorithm is developed to address the uncertainty in the selection of drugs in EmDM issues with regards to clinical analysis. The actual contextual analysis of the selection of the appropriate drug to treat coronavirus ailment is utilized to show the practicality of our proposed technique. Finally, with the help of a comparative analysis of the TOPSIS technique, we demonstrate the efficiency and applicability of the established methodology.

摘要

由于各种紧急情况不断发生,造成了重大的社会和经济损失,紧急决策(EmDM)的重要性最近得到了体现。当需要减轻财产和生命损失,并减少对社会和自然发展的负面影响时,紧急决策发挥着可控作用。现实世界中的紧急决策问题通常被描述为复杂、耗时、缺乏数据,以及心理因素的影响,这使得决策者面临一项具有挑战性的任务。本文表明有必要应对各种类型的不确定性,并监测相关做法以解决这些问题。在临床分析中,如何从某些对冠状病毒病具有疗效值的药物中选择理想药物,如今已成为一个常见问题。为解决这一问题,我们正在基于毕达哥拉斯概率犹豫模糊信息下的EDAS方法建立一种多属性决策方法(MADMap)。此外,还开发了一种算法来解决紧急决策问题中临床分析药物选择方面的不确定性。通过选择治疗冠状病毒病的合适药物的实际案例分析,来展示我们所提出技术的实用性。最后,借助与TOPSIS技术的对比分析,我们证明了所建立方法的有效性和适用性。

相似文献

1
EDAS method for decision support modeling under the Pythagorean probabilistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation information.基于勾股概率犹豫模糊聚合信息的决策支持建模的EDAS方法
J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2022;13(12):5491-5504. doi: 10.1007/s12652-021-03181-1. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
2
Entropy Based Pythagorean Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Decision Making Technique and Its Application for Fog-Haze Factor Assessment Problem.基于熵的毕达哥拉斯概率犹豫模糊决策技术及其在雾霾因素评估问题中的应用
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Mar 11;22(3):318. doi: 10.3390/e22030318.
3
Interactive group decision making method based on probabilistic hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy information representation.基于概率犹豫毕达哥拉斯模糊信息表示的交互式群体决策方法
Appl Intell (Dordr). 2022;52(15):18226-18247. doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-03749-0. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
4
A model for emergency supply management under extended EDAS method and spherical hesitant fuzzy soft aggregation information.基于扩展的 EDAS 方法和球形犹豫模糊软聚合信息的应急供应管理模型。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 24;13(1):8375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35390-3.
5
Optimized multiple-attribute group decision-making through employing probabilistic hesitant fuzzy TODIM and EDAS technique and application to teaching quality evaluation of international Chinese course in higher vocational colleges.基于概率犹豫模糊TODIM和EDAS技术的优化多属性群决策及其在高职院校国际汉语课程教学质量评价中的应用
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 10;10(4):e25758. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25758. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
6
A Decision Support Model for Hotel Recommendation Based on the Online Consumer Reviews Using Logarithmic Spherical Hesitant Fuzzy Information.一种基于在线消费者评论并使用对数球面犹豫模糊信息的酒店推荐决策支持模型。
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Apr 6;23(4):432. doi: 10.3390/e23040432.
7
Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on binary connection number of set pair analysis.基于集对分析二元联系数的犹豫模糊多属性决策
Soft comput. 2021;25(23):14797-14807. doi: 10.1007/s00500-021-06215-0. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
Stochastic multiple attribute decision making with Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy set based on regret theory.基于后悔理论的毕达哥拉斯犹豫模糊集的随机多属性决策
Math Biosci Eng. 2023 May 26;20(7):12562-12578. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023559.
9
Multi-attribute decision-making method based on q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy schweizer-sklar power weighted hamy mean operator.基于 q 阶对偶犹豫模糊施韦策-斯克拉幂型汉密尔顿均值算子的多属性决策方法。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 15;18(2):e0266779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266779. eCollection 2023.
10
Making Group Decisions within the Framework of a Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linear Regression Model.在概率犹豫模糊线性回归模型框架内进行群体决策。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 31;22(15):5736. doi: 10.3390/s22155736.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a triangular Fermatean fuzzy EDAS model for remote patient monitoring applications.用于远程患者监测应用的三角费马模糊EDAS模型的开发。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22073. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00914-6.
2
Selection of third-party logistics in supply chain finance under probabilistic complex hesitant fuzzy sets and distance measures.基于概率复杂犹豫模糊集和距离测度的供应链金融中第三方物流的选择
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 22;10(17):e36544. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36544. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
3
Optimizing photovoltaic thermal (PVT) collector selection: A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for renewable energy systems.优化光伏-热(PVT)集热器的选择:一种用于可再生能源系统的多准则决策(MCDM)方法。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 13;10(6):e27605. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27605. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
4
Additive manufacturing process selection for automotive industry using Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC EDAS.基于 Pythagorean 模糊 CRITIC-EDAS 的汽车行业增材制造工艺选择
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 9;18(3):e0282676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282676. eCollection 2023.
5
New method for emergency decision making with an integrated regret theory-EDAS method in 2-tuple spherical linguistic environment.二元组球面语言环境下基于集成后悔理论的应急决策新方法——EDAS法
Appl Intell (Dordr). 2022;52(11):13296-13309. doi: 10.1007/s10489-021-02875-5. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
6
Cloud vendor selection for the healthcare industry using a big data-driven decision model with probabilistic linguistic information.使用具有概率语言信息的大数据驱动决策模型进行医疗行业云供应商选择
Appl Intell (Dordr). 2022;52(12):13497-13519. doi: 10.1007/s10489-021-02913-2. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
7
Decades on emergency decision-making: a bibliometric analysis and literature review.数十年来的应急决策:文献计量分析与文献综述
Complex Intell Systems. 2021;7(6):2819-2832. doi: 10.1007/s40747-021-00451-5. Epub 2021 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency decision support modeling for COVID-19 based on spherical fuzzy information.基于球形模糊信息的新冠肺炎应急决策支持建模
Int J Intell Syst. 2020 Nov;35(11):1601-1645. doi: 10.1002/int.22262. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
2
Entropy Based Pythagorean Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Decision Making Technique and Its Application for Fog-Haze Factor Assessment Problem.基于熵的毕达哥拉斯概率犹豫模糊决策技术及其在雾霾因素评估问题中的应用
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Mar 11;22(3):318. doi: 10.3390/e22030318.
3
A new emergency response of spherical intelligent fuzzy decision process to diagnose of COVID19.一种用于诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎的球形智能模糊决策过程的新型应急响应。
Soft comput. 2023;27(3):1809-1825. doi: 10.1007/s00500-020-05287-8. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
4
Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve practitioners' diagnostic test ordering behavior? A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review.计算机化临床决策支持系统能否改善从业者的诊断性检测开单行为?决策者-研究者合作的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2011 Aug 3;6:88. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-88.
5
Grand challenges in clinical decision support.临床决策支持中的重大挑战。
J Biomed Inform. 2008 Apr;41(2):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.09.003. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
6
Decision support, knowledge representation and management in medicine.医学中的决策支持、知识表示与管理。
Yearb Med Inform. 2006:72-80.
7
Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success.使用临床决策支持系统改善临床实践:对确定成功关键特征的试验进行系统评价。
BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):765. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38398.500764.8F. Epub 2005 Mar 14.
8
Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients.预防住院患者静脉血栓栓塞的电子警报
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):969-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041533.
9
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.计算机化临床决策支持系统对从业者表现和患者结局的影响:一项系统综述。
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.
10
Improving preventive care by prompting physicians.通过提示医生来改善预防保健。
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Feb 14;160(3):301-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.3.301.