Hong Jui-Yang, Gallanter Eden, Müller-Oehring Eva M, Schulte Tilman
Neuroscience Program, Biosciences Division, Center for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Graduate School of Clinical Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2019;31(5-6):543-558. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2019.1642897. Epub 2019 Jul 14.
Procedural learning and memory has been conceptualised as consisting of cognitive and autonomous phases. Although the Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) is a popular task used to study procedural memory (PM), it has not been used to explore the different phases of PM. The present study employed a modified SRTT and investigated whether it can distinguish phases of PM. Our results revealed that performance at the beginning of typing a repeating sequence was marked by a steep learning curve, followed by gradual improvements and ending in high performance levels without further improvement. Steep performance increases characterise the effortful learning of the cognitive phase, gradual increases at higher performances characterise emerging automatisation of the associative phase, and sustained highest performance characterises autonomous procedures when PM has formed. Our study presents an easy-to-use measure, capable of distinguishing phases of PM, and which can be useful to assess PM during brain development.
程序性学习和记忆被概念化为由认知阶段和自主阶段组成。尽管序列反应时任务(SRTT)是用于研究程序性记忆(PM)的常用任务,但它尚未被用于探索程序性记忆的不同阶段。本研究采用了改良的序列反应时任务,并调查其是否能够区分程序性记忆的不同阶段。我们的结果显示,在输入重复序列开始时的表现以陡峭的学习曲线为特征,随后逐渐改善,并在高水平表现时结束且不再进一步提高。陡峭的表现提升表征认知阶段的努力学习,较高表现时的逐渐提升表征联想阶段新兴的自动化,而持续的最高表现表征程序性记忆形成时的自主程序。我们的研究提出了一种易于使用的测量方法,能够区分程序性记忆的不同阶段,并且在评估大脑发育过程中的程序性记忆时可能会有用。