Suppr超能文献

在评估胸廓出口综合征时,激发试验期间的多普勒波形分析会导致较高的假阳性率:一项横断面研究。

Doppler waveform analysis during provocative manoeuvres in the assessment for arterial thoracic outlet syndrome results in high false-positive rates; a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Bishop Lily, Bartlett Matthew

机构信息

Department of Vascular Studies, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Department of Surgery & Interventional Medicine, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Apr 1;10:20480040211006571. doi: 10.1177/20480040211006571. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is a high rate of false-positive arterial Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (ATOS) diagnoses due to limited research into the optimal use of ultrasound. To improve future diagnostic efficiency, we aimed to characterise the haemodynamic effects of different provocative positions and estimate the prevalence of compression in the healthy population.

DESIGN

In this cross-sectional, observational study, the effect of varying degrees of arm abduction on discomfort levels and/or changes in subclavian artery Doppler waveform was analysed in the healthy population; the peak systolic velocity (PSV), systolic rise time (SRT), phasicity and extent of turbulence were recorded.

SETTING

Department of the Vascular Studies, Royal Free Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

19 participants (11 females, 27.4 ± 5.2 years) were recruited for bilateral scans.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Seven positions were investigated; the primary outcome was an occlusion or monophasic waveform indicating significant compression and this was compared with the secondary outcome; any physiological discomfort.

RESULTS

28.9% experienced significant arterial compression in at least one position; 120° abduction was the position with the greatest level of abduction that did not result in significant waveform changes or symptoms. The PSV and SRT were difficult to accurately measure and bore no correlation to the level of compression.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound testing in isolation would result in a false indication of TOS in almost 30% of our normal population. With further research, the 120° abduction position may have a lower false-positive rate. The PSV and SRT must be interpreted with caution due to their variability even within the healthy population.

摘要

目的

由于对超声最佳使用方法的研究有限,动脉型胸廓出口综合征(ATOS)的误诊率很高。为提高未来的诊断效率,我们旨在描述不同激发体位的血流动力学效应,并估计健康人群中血管受压的发生率。

设计

在这项横断面观察性研究中,分析了健康人群中不同程度的手臂外展对不适程度和/或锁骨下动脉多普勒波形变化的影响;记录收缩期峰值流速(PSV)、收缩期上升时间(SRT)、搏动性和湍流程度。

地点

皇家自由医院血管研究部。

参与者

招募了19名参与者(11名女性,年龄27.4±5.2岁)进行双侧扫描。

主要观察指标

研究了七个体位;主要观察指标是闭塞或单相波形,表明存在明显受压,并将其与次要观察指标进行比较;任何生理不适。

结果

28.9%的参与者在至少一个体位出现明显的动脉受压;120°外展是外展程度最大但未导致明显波形变化或症状的体位。PSV和SRT难以准确测量,且与受压程度无关。

结论

单独进行超声检查会使近30%的正常人群出现胸廓出口综合征的假阳性指征。随着进一步研究,120°外展位可能具有较低的假阳性率。由于PSV和SRT即使在健康人群中也存在变异性,因此必须谨慎解读。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5829/8020236/956960ba56fd/10.1177_20480040211006571-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验