Haberfeld Yitchak, Birgier Debora Pricila, Lundh Christer, Elldér Erik
Department of Labor Studies, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Department of Economy and Society, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Front Sociol. 2019 Sep 13;4:66. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00066. eCollection 2019.
Following the intensified waves of refugees entering Europe, dispersal policies for newly arrived refugees have been proposed to speed up their integration and to share the financial burden across and within the EU countries. The effectiveness of dispersal policies depends, among other factors, on the extent to which refugees tend to stay in the initial location they are assigned to live in, and on their patterns of self-selectivity during subsequent moves of internal migration. Economic theories of migration suggest that economic immigrants are self-selected to destinations based on their abilities. Highly skilled and motivated people tend to migrate to labor markets with broader opportunity structures, while less capable individuals choose markets that are more sheltered. We use a quasi-experimental design to examine the extent to which those theories are first, applicable to refugees as well, and second, explain their self-sorting into local labor markets at destination. We focus on a refugee cohort that came to Sweden during the period when the so-called "" policy was in effect. This policy was designed to reduce the concentration of refugees in the larger cities by randomly deploying asylum seekers across Sweden. After being assigned to an initial location, refugees could move freely within Sweden. We use individual register data from Statistics Sweden to study all refugees who arrived in Sweden during 1990-1993, and we follow each one of them during an 8-year period. We use discrete-time survival analysis (complementary log-log models) in order to assess the effects of abilities on the destination choices of refugees, and individual fixed-effect models to assess the effects of internal migration on their income. Destinations were defined on the basis of the economic opportunities they offer. The results suggest that refugees' education levels are related to major differences in their destination choices. Highly skilled refugees were more likely to migrate to labor markets with a wide structure of opportunities relative to less skilled refugees. In addition, all relocation choices had positive effects on refugees' income growth.
随着难民涌入欧洲的浪潮加剧,为加速新到难民融入并在欧盟国家间及内部分担财政负担,人们提出了难民分散政策。分散政策的有效性,除其他因素外,取决于难民在被分配居住的初始地点的停留倾向,以及他们在后续国内迁移过程中的自我选择模式。移民经济理论表明,经济移民会根据自身能力自我选择目的地。高技能且积极性高的人往往会迁移到机会结构更广阔的劳动力市场,而能力较差的人则选择更具庇护性的市场。我们采用准实验设计来检验这些理论在多大程度上,首先适用于难民,其次解释他们在目的地自我分类进入当地劳动力市场的情况。我们关注的是在所谓“[政策名称]”政策生效期间来到瑞典的一批难民。该政策旨在通过在瑞典各地随机安置寻求庇护者来减少难民在大城市的集中程度。在被分配到初始地点后,难民可在瑞典境内自由迁移。我们使用瑞典统计局的个人登记数据来研究1990 - 1993年期间抵达瑞典的所有难民,并在8年期间跟踪他们每个人。我们使用离散时间生存分析(互补对数-对数模型)来评估能力对难民目的地选择的影响,并使用个体固定效应模型来评估国内迁移对他们收入的影响。目的地是根据其提供的经济机会来定义的。结果表明,难民的教育水平与他们的目的地选择存在重大差异有关。相对于技能较低的难民,高技能难民更有可能迁移到机会结构广泛的劳动力市场。此外,所有重新安置选择都对难民的收入增长产生了积极影响。