Isaksson Anna
School of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.
Front Sociol. 2020 Oct 19;5:532792. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.532792. eCollection 2020.
There is a body of literature problematizing women's accounts in what is called classical sociology. However, limited efforts have been made to place female and male theorists' writings in juxtaposition with each other in order to demonstrate how their writings and theories differ. The aim of this article is to encourage discussion of how early female and male sociological theorists' descriptions and interpretations on the development of modern society were shaped by their own gendered experiences. Further, the aim is to shed light on the consequences this might provide for the teaching and learning of classical sociology. The article contributes a comparative analysis on how five authors, three female and two male, described and interpreted the transition from traditional to modern society through their gendered experiences. Their various interpretations illustrate how experiences are situated and that there is no complete and objective knowledge. As a consequence, universities should pay careful attention to gender distribution in their syllabi. Rather than achieve equal numbers of female and male authors, this will ensure that students are able to explore and understand classical sociology through the lens of different gendered experiences during their studies.
有一批文献对所谓经典社会学中女性的叙述提出了质疑。然而,为了展示女性和男性理论家的著作与理论之间的差异,将二者并列比较的工作做得还很有限。本文旨在鼓励人们探讨早期女性和男性社会学理论家对现代社会发展的描述与阐释是如何受到他们各自性别化经历的影响。此外,本文旨在阐明这可能会给经典社会学的教学带来怎样的影响。本文对三位女性和两位男性这五位作者如何通过其性别化经历描述和阐释从传统社会向现代社会的转变进行了比较分析。他们的不同阐释表明经历是如何形成的,且不存在完整客观的知识。因此,大学应在课程大纲中仔细关注性别分布情况。这并非要实现男女作者数量相等,而是要确保学生在学习过程中能够通过不同性别化经历的视角去探索和理解经典社会学。