Flisbäck Marita
Department of Work Life and Social Welfare, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life, and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.
Front Sociol. 2024 May 24;9:1383028. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1383028. eCollection 2024.
Sociologists often argue that communication in long-term couple relationships is the basis on which expectations, trust, and equality are created in contemporary society. However, what is the role of these everyday conversations in uncertain life situations such as expecting one's first child? This article examines concerns reported by prospective Swedish parents in order to explain the role of communication to alleviate these. Concerns, related to the formation of new relationships with one's partner, oneself, and one's future child, are mitigated by referring to the couple's "good" communication. In the present prenatal situation, the communication pattern (established in the past) seems to serve three functions in mitigating future concerns: (1) the communication generates a trust capital in the relationship, allowing the couple to venture into the uncertain future, (2) the communication makes social perceptions of family life "real" by constructing a common that is internalized in the individual as an existential motto, and (3) the communication legitimizes family practices as democratic when referring to future plans as emerging from responsive and consensual dialogs. In the article it is emphasized that welfare policy needs to be based on an existential legitimacy, often developed in couple conversations, and particularly shaped in life situations characterized by change. However, the stability offered at the conversational micro level may simultaneously prevent macro level changes, a complexity that needs to be considered when developing a gender equality policy that is to resonate with people's existential meaning making. With the aim of consensus, and the means of balancing conflicts, there is a risk that the conversation will consolidate the interests of the stronger party. In this way, the responsive conversations in long-term relationships may consolidate gender inequality and counteract the welfare policy goal of equalizing power relationships.
社会学家常认为,长期伴侣关系中的沟通是当代社会中期望、信任和平等得以建立的基础。然而,在诸如期待第一个孩子这样的不确定生活情境中,这些日常对话扮演着怎样的角色呢?本文考察了瑞典准父母们报告的担忧,以解释沟通在缓解这些担忧方面所起的作用。与和伴侣、自己以及未来孩子建立新关系相关的担忧,通过提及夫妻间“良好”的沟通得以减轻。在当前的产前情境中,(过去建立的)沟通模式在缓解未来担忧方面似乎发挥着三种功能:(1)沟通在关系中产生信任资本,使夫妻能够勇敢面对不确定的未来;(2)沟通通过构建一种共同理念,让家庭生活的社会认知变得“真实”,这种理念在个体内心被内化为一种生存座右铭;(3)当提及源于回应性和协商性对话的未来计划时,沟通使家庭实践具有民主合法性。本文强调,福利政策需要基于一种常常在夫妻对话中形成、尤其在以变化为特征的生活情境中塑造的生存合法性。然而,在对话微观层面提供的稳定性可能同时阻碍宏观层面的变革,在制定一项能与人们的生存意义构建产生共鸣的性别平等政策时,需要考虑到这种复杂性。出于达成共识的目的以及平衡冲突的手段,对话存在巩固强势一方利益的风险。这样一来,长期关系中的回应性对话可能会巩固性别不平等,抵消权力关系平等化的福利政策目标。