Falcke Swantje, Vink Maarten
Political Science, Faculty of Arts and Social Science, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Florence, Italy.
Front Sociol. 2020 Dec 15;5:536940. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.536940. eCollection 2020.
The German citizenship law underwent a paradigmatic amendment in 2000. One often overlooked change of this reform was the abolishment of the domestic clause ("Inlandsklausel") that implied a substantial restriction to de facto dual citizenship acceptance. Combining data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (waves 1993-2006) with original data on origin country policies on dual citizenship and citizenship reacquisition, we analyse the impact of the abolishment of the domestic clause on naturalization rates. We apply a difference-in-difference design to investigate the causal impact of this element of the reform which has remained under-studied. We do not find an impact of the abolishment of the domestic clause on naturalization rates, neither among the general migrant population, nor among Turkish migrants who are alleged to be targeted specifically by this reform. These results suggest that a more restrictive approach to dual citizenship did not dissuade migrants from acquiring German citizenship after 2000.
德国公民法在2000年经历了一次范式性修订。这项改革中一个常常被忽视的变化是废除了国内条款(“Inlandsklausel”),该条款对事实上的双重国籍接受度施加了重大限制。我们将德国社会经济面板研究(1993 - 2006年各波次)的数据与关于原籍国双重国籍和重新获得国籍政策的原始数据相结合,分析废除国内条款对入籍率的影响。我们采用差分设计来研究这项改革中这一未得到充分研究的要素的因果影响。我们发现,废除国内条款对入籍率没有影响,无论是在一般移民群体中,还是在据称是这项改革特别针对的土耳其移民群体中。这些结果表明,对双重国籍采取更严格的做法并没有阻止移民在2000年后获得德国公民身份。