• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颌阻生第三磨牙亚组间下颌骨形态测量及小梁结构的评估。

Evaluation of mandibular morphologic measurements and trabecular structure among subgroups of impacted mandibular third molars.

作者信息

Gonca Merve, Gunacar Dilara Nil, Kose Taha Emre, Karamehmetoglu Irem

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey.

出版信息

Oral Radiol. 2022 Jan;38(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s11282-021-00527-5. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11282-021-00527-5
PMID:33870446
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate mandibular morphologic measurements and trabecular structures that may cause mandibular third molar (MM3) impaction according to MM3 subgroups.

METHODS

A total of 150 MM3 of 2175 panoramic radiographs (PRs) were reviewed. MM3s according to Winter (vertical), Pell & Gregory Class 1 and group: A, B, C on PRs were included in the study group. Fractal dimensions (FD) and mandibular morphologic measurements were evaluated. Statistical analysis for parametric values was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical analysis for non-parametric values was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis H test.

RESULTS

Statistically, a significant difference was found only in terms of angle of impaction among the groups of MM3 (p < 0.05) [Winter (vertical), and Pell & Gregory Class 1 and group A, B, C]. There was no difference among groups A, B, C in mandibular morphology and trabecular structure, but group C showed different characteristics than the other groups only in terms of impaction angle.

CONCLUSION

The trabecular structure and morphometric properties except for the angle of impaction do not affect impacted MM3s with adequate retromolar space and vertical angle.

摘要

目的

根据下颌第三磨牙(MM3)亚组,研究可能导致MM3阻生的下颌形态测量和小梁结构。

方法

回顾了2175张全景片(PR)中的150颗MM3。根据Winter(垂直型)、Pell & Gregory 1类以及PR上的A、B、C组的MM3被纳入研究组。评估分形维数(FD)和下颌形态测量。参数值的统计分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)。非参数值的统计分析采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验。

结果

统计学上,仅在MM3组(Winter(垂直型)、Pell & Gregory 1类以及A、B、C组)之间的阻生角度方面发现显著差异(p < 0.05)。A、B、C组在下颌形态和小梁结构上无差异,但C组仅在阻生角度方面表现出与其他组不同的特征。

结论

除阻生角度外,小梁结构和形态测量特性不会影响具有足够磨牙后间隙和垂直角度的阻生MM3。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of mandibular morphologic measurements and trabecular structure among subgroups of impacted mandibular third molars.下颌阻生第三磨牙亚组间下颌骨形态测量及小梁结构的评估。
Oral Radiol. 2022 Jan;38(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s11282-021-00527-5. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
2
Evaluation of the relationship between gonial angle and impacted mandibular third molar teeth.下颌角与下颌阻生第三磨牙关系的评估。
Anat Sci Int. 2020 Jan;95(1):134-142. doi: 10.1007/s12565-019-00507-0. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
3
Is there a relationship between third-molar impaction types and the dimensional/angular measurement values of posterior mandible according to Pell & Gregory/Winter Classification?根据佩尔-格雷戈里/温特分类法,第三磨牙阻生类型与下颌后牙的维度/角度测量值之间是否存在关系?
Oral Radiol. 2021 Jan;37(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/s11282-019-00420-2. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
4
A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.在评估下颌阻生第三磨牙的位置和形态方面,胶片全景X线片与数字全景X线片的比较性评价
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;22(2):219-24. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.84290.
5
Assessment of Third Molar Impaction Pattern and Associated Clinical Symptoms in a Central Anatolian Turkish Population.安纳托利亚中部土耳其人群中第三磨牙阻生模式及相关临床症状的评估。
Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(2):169-75. doi: 10.1159/000442416. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
6
Does the Winter or Pell and Gregory Classification System Indicate the Apical Position of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars?冬季分类系统或佩尔与格雷戈里分类系统能否表明下颌阻生第三磨牙的根尖位置?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Nov;77(11):2222.e1-2222.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
Vertical eruption patterns of impacted mandibular third molars after the mesialization of second molars using miniscrews.使用微型螺钉使第二磨牙近中移动后,下颌阻生第三磨牙的垂直萌出模式
Angle Orthod. 2016 Jul;86(4):565-70. doi: 10.2319/061415-399.1. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
8
Pattern of mandibular third molar impaction: A cross-sectional study in northeast of Iran.下颌第三磨牙阻生模式:伊朗东北部的一项横断面研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2014 Nov-Dec;17(6):673-7. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.144376.
9
Influence and Impact of Mandibular Ramal Dimensions on the Incidence of Lower Third Molar Impaction: A Prospective Study.下颌升支尺寸对下颌第三磨牙阻生发生率的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S364-S368. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_173_22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
10
Surgical Uprighting Is a Successful Procedure for Management of Impacted Mandibular Second Molars.外科直立术是治疗下颌阻生第二磨牙的一种成功方法。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Aug;75(8):1581-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.027. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of bone mineral density in premature birth and low birth weight children by fractal analysis on panoramic radiographs.通过全景X线片的分形分析对早产和低出生体重儿童骨密度的比较评估
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 5;25(1):915. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06312-8.
2
Does Mandibular Gonial Angle Influence the Eruption Pattern of the Lower Third Molar? A Three-Dimensional Study.下颌角对下颌第三磨牙萌出模式有影响吗?一项三维研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 8;10(18):4057. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184057.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of radiotherapy on mandibular bone: A retrospective study of digital panoramic radiographs.放射治疗对下颌骨的影响:数字化全景X线片的回顾性研究
Imaging Sci Dent. 2020 Mar;50(1):31-36. doi: 10.5624/isd.2020.50.1.31. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
2
Evaluation of the mandibular trabecular bone in patients with bruxism using fractal analysis.磨牙症患者下颌骨小梁骨的分形分析评估。
Oral Radiol. 2021 Jan;37(1):36-45. doi: 10.1007/s11282-020-00422-5. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
3
Is there a relationship between third-molar impaction types and the dimensional/angular measurement values of posterior mandible according to Pell & Gregory/Winter Classification?
根据佩尔-格雷戈里/温特分类法,第三磨牙阻生类型与下颌后牙的维度/角度测量值之间是否存在关系?
Oral Radiol. 2021 Jan;37(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/s11282-019-00420-2. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
4
Relationship of Mandibular Ramus Dimensions to Lower Third Molar Impaction.下颌升支尺寸与下颌第三磨牙阻生的关系。
Eur J Dent. 2019 May;13(2):213-221. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693922. Epub 2019 Sep 8.
5
Relationship between condyle cortication, sphenooccipital synchondrosis, and chronological age.髁突皮质骨、蝶枕联合与年龄的关系。
Oral Radiol. 2020 Apr;36(2):190-196. doi: 10.1007/s11282-019-00398-x. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
6
Strut analysis for osteoporosis detection model using dental panoramic radiography.使用牙科全景X线摄影术进行骨质疏松检测模型的支柱分析。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017 Oct;46(7):20170006. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170006. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
7
Clinical and radiological classification of the jawbone anatomy in endosseous dental implant treatment.牙种植治疗中颌骨解剖结构的临床与影像学分类
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2013 Jul 1;4(2):e2. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2013.4202.
8
Mandibular cephalometric characteristics of a Saudi sample of patients having impacted third molars.一组沙特第三磨牙阻生患者样本的下颌骨头颅测量特征。
Saudi Dent J. 2011 Apr;23(2):73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
9
Fractals in dentistry.牙科中的分形
J Dent. 2011 Apr;39(4):273-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
10
Mandibular third molar space in different antero-posterior skeletal patterns.不同前后向骨骼型的下颌第三磨牙间隙。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Oct;33(5):570-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq125. Epub 2010 Dec 27.