Suppr超能文献

下颌阻生第三磨牙亚组间下颌骨形态测量及小梁结构的评估。

Evaluation of mandibular morphologic measurements and trabecular structure among subgroups of impacted mandibular third molars.

作者信息

Gonca Merve, Gunacar Dilara Nil, Kose Taha Emre, Karamehmetoglu Irem

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey.

出版信息

Oral Radiol. 2022 Jan;38(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s11282-021-00527-5. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate mandibular morphologic measurements and trabecular structures that may cause mandibular third molar (MM3) impaction according to MM3 subgroups.

METHODS

A total of 150 MM3 of 2175 panoramic radiographs (PRs) were reviewed. MM3s according to Winter (vertical), Pell & Gregory Class 1 and group: A, B, C on PRs were included in the study group. Fractal dimensions (FD) and mandibular morphologic measurements were evaluated. Statistical analysis for parametric values was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical analysis for non-parametric values was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis H test.

RESULTS

Statistically, a significant difference was found only in terms of angle of impaction among the groups of MM3 (p < 0.05) [Winter (vertical), and Pell & Gregory Class 1 and group A, B, C]. There was no difference among groups A, B, C in mandibular morphology and trabecular structure, but group C showed different characteristics than the other groups only in terms of impaction angle.

CONCLUSION

The trabecular structure and morphometric properties except for the angle of impaction do not affect impacted MM3s with adequate retromolar space and vertical angle.

摘要

目的

根据下颌第三磨牙(MM3)亚组,研究可能导致MM3阻生的下颌形态测量和小梁结构。

方法

回顾了2175张全景片(PR)中的150颗MM3。根据Winter(垂直型)、Pell & Gregory 1类以及PR上的A、B、C组的MM3被纳入研究组。评估分形维数(FD)和下颌形态测量。参数值的统计分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)。非参数值的统计分析采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验。

结果

统计学上,仅在MM3组(Winter(垂直型)、Pell & Gregory 1类以及A、B、C组)之间的阻生角度方面发现显著差异(p < 0.05)。A、B、C组在下颌形态和小梁结构上无差异,但C组仅在阻生角度方面表现出与其他组不同的特征。

结论

除阻生角度外,小梁结构和形态测量特性不会影响具有足够磨牙后间隙和垂直角度的阻生MM3。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验