Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 1;49(9):1481-1492. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005033.
To provide a comparative analysis of conventional heparin-versus bivalirudin-based systemic anticoagulation in adult and pediatric patients supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Retrospective chart review study of adult and pediatric patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation from January 1, 2014, to October 1, 2019.
A large, high-volume tertiary referral adult and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center.
Four hundred twenty-four individuals requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and systemically anticoagulated with either unfractionated heparin (223 adult and 65 pediatric patients) or bivalirudin (110 adult and 24 pediatric patients) were included.
None.
Digital data abstraction was used to retrospectively collect patient details. The majority of both groups were cannulated centrally (67%), and the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation type was predominantly venoarterial (84%). The adult bivalirudin group had a greater occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (12% vs 1%; p < 0.01) and was more likely to require postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (36% vs 55%; p < 0.01). There were no statistical differences between the groups in regards to age, sex, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation location. The main finding was a reduced mortality in the adult bivalirudin group (odds ratio, 0.39; p < 0.01), whereas no difference was noted in the pediatric group. A significant reduction in the composite transfusion requirement in the first 24 hours was noted in the pediatric bivaluridin group with an odds ratio of 0.28 (p = 0.02). Groups did not differ in regard to laboratories per day, anticoagulant dose adjustments, or ischemic complications.
When compared with heparin-based systemic anticoagulation, bivalirudin demonstrated feasibility and safety as established by the absence of increases in identifiable adverse outcomes while manifesting substantial improvements in hospital mortality in adult patients. Further studies are necessary to corroborate these findings and further elucidate the role of bivalirudin during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.
对接受体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)支持的成人和儿科患者,比较基于普通肝素和比伐卢定的全身抗凝治疗。
回顾性图表分析研究,纳入 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 10 月 1 日接受 ECMO 支持的成人和儿科患者。
一个大型、高容量的成人和儿科 ECMO 中心。
424 名需要 ECMO 支持并全身抗凝的患者,其中接受普通肝素(223 名成人和 65 名儿科患者)或比伐卢定(110 名成人和 24 名儿科患者)抗凝。
无。
使用数字数据提取方法回顾性收集患者资料。两组患者大多数均经中心插管(67%),体外膜肺氧合类型主要为静脉-动脉(84%)。成人比伐卢定组肝素诱导血小板减少症的发生率更高(12%比 1%;p < 0.01),更有可能需要心脏手术后 ECMO(36%比 55%;p < 0.01)。两组患者在年龄、性别和 ECMO 开始位置方面无统计学差异。主要发现是成人比伐卢定组死亡率降低(比值比,0.39;p < 0.01),而儿科组无差异。儿科比伐卢定组在 24 小时内的复合输血需求显著减少,比值比为 0.28(p = 0.02)。两组在每天实验室检查、抗凝剂剂量调整或缺血性并发症方面无差异。
与基于肝素的全身抗凝相比,比伐卢定在成人患者中表现出可行性和安全性,没有增加可识别的不良结局,同时显著降低了住院死亡率。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现,并进一步阐明比伐卢定在 ECMO 支持期间的作用。