Suppr超能文献

成人体外膜肺氧合中肝素与比伐卢定全身抗凝策略的药品采购批发成本及实验室评估成本分析

Analysis of Wholesale Drug Acquisition and Laboratory Assessment Costs Between Heparin Compared With Bivalirudin-Based Systemic Anticoagulation Strategies in Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

作者信息

Seelhammer Troy G, Brokmeier Hannah M, Hamzah Mohammed, Wieruszewski Patrick M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2023 May 1;51(5):e115-e121. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005821. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the wholistic costs of systemic anticoagulation delivery in heparin versus bivalirudin-based maintenance of adult patients supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Large academic ECMO center.

PATIENTS

Adults on ECMO receiving heparin or bivalirudin for primary maintenance systemic anticoagulation.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Electronic data were abstracted from a database maintained by our ECMO center, which transitioned to a preferred bivalirudin-based anticoagulation management in 2017. The pretransition group consisted of 126 patients (123 heparin and three bivalirudin), whereas the posttransition group included 275 patients (82 heparin and 193 bivalirudin). Drug costs were estimated using the wholesale acquisition cost, and laboratory assays costs were estimated using reimbursement fee schedules. Cost data were normalized to the duration of the ECMO run and reported in U.S. Dollar per ECMO day. Following the practice change, bivalirudin patients were less likely to receive AT supplementation (31.0 vs 12.4%; p < 0.0001) and had fewer coagulation assays ordered (6.1 vs 5.4 per ECMO day; p = 0.0004). After the transition, there was a dramatic decrease in costs related to AT assay assessments ($11.78 [interquartile range {IQR}, $9.48-$13.09] vs $1.03 [IQR, $0-$5.75]; p < 0.0001) and AT supplementation ($0 [IQR, $0-$312.82] vs $0 [IQR, $0-$0]; p < 0.0001) per ECMO day. Unadjusted survival at 28 days was higher posttransition (64.3 vs 74.9%; p = 0.0286).

CONCLUSIONS

Antithrombin assays and supplementation compromise a significant proportion of heparin-based anticoagulation costs in ECMO patients and is substantially reduced when a bivalirudin-based anticoagulation strategy is deployed. A favorable association exists between the aggregate cost of administration of bivalirudin compared with heparin-based systemic anticoagulation in adults supported on ECMO driven by reductions in antithrombin activity assessments and the cost of antithrombin replacement.

摘要

目的

评估在接受体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)支持的成年患者中,使用肝素与比伐卢定进行全身抗凝维持治疗的整体成本。

设计

单中心回顾性队列研究。

地点

大型学术性ECMO中心。

患者

接受肝素或比伐卢定进行主要全身抗凝维持治疗的成年ECMO患者。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

电子数据从我们ECMO中心维护的数据库中提取,该中心于2017年转为首选的基于比伐卢定的抗凝管理。转换前组包括126例患者(123例使用肝素,3例使用比伐卢定),而转换后组包括275例患者(82例使用肝素,193例使用比伐卢定)。药物成本使用批发采购成本估算,实验室检测成本使用报销费用表估算。成本数据根据ECMO运行时间进行标准化,并以每ECMO日美元为单位报告。实践改变后,使用比伐卢定的患者接受抗凝血酶(AT)补充的可能性较小(31.0%对12.4%;p<0.0001),且进行的凝血检测较少(每ECMO日6.1次对5.4次;p = 0.0004)。转换后,与AT检测评估相关的成本大幅下降(每ECMO日11.78美元[四分位间距{IQR},9.48 - 13.09美元]对1.03美元[IQR,0 - 5.75美元];p<0.0001),AT补充成本也下降(每ECMO日0美元[IQR,0 - 312.82美元]对0美元[IQR,0 - 0美元];p<0.0001)。转换后28天的未调整生存率更高(64.3%对74.9%;p = 0.0286)。

结论

在ECMO患者中,抗凝血酶检测和补充占基于肝素的抗凝成本的很大一部分,而采用基于比伐卢定的抗凝策略时,这一成本会大幅降低。在接受ECMO支持的成年患者中,与基于肝素的全身抗凝相比,比伐卢定给药的总成本与抗凝血酶活性评估及抗凝血酶替代成本的降低之间存在有利关联。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验