Suppr超能文献

医护人员预防锐器伤和喷溅暴露的教育和培训。

Education and training for preventing sharps injuries and splash exposures in healthcare workers.

机构信息

Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

School of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 14;4(4):CD012060. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012060.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In healthcare settings, health care workers (HCWs) are at risk of acquiring infectious diseases through sharps injuries and splash exposures to blood or bodily fluids. Education and training interventions are widely used to protect workers' health and safety and to prevent sharps injuries. In certain countries, they are part of obligatory professional development for HCWs.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of education and training interventions compared to no intervention or alternative interventions for preventing sharps injuries and splash exposures in HCWs.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, NHSEED, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL and OSH-update (from all time until February 2016). In addition, we searched the databases of Global Health, AustHealth and Web of Science (from all time until February 2016). The original search strategy was re-run in November 2019, and again in February 2020. In April 2020, the search strategy was updated and run in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science (from 2016 to current).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-randomized trials (cluster-RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), interrupted time series (ITS) study designs, and controlled before-and-after studies (CBA), that evaluated the effect of education and training interventions on the incidence of sharps injuries and splash exposures compared to no-intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors (SC, HL) independently selected studies, and extracted data for the included studies. Studies were analyzed, risk of bias assessed (HL, JL) , and pooled using random-effect meta-analysis, where applicable, according to their design types. As primary outcome we looked for sharps injuries and splash exposures and calculated them as incidence of injuries per 1000 health care workers per year. For the quality of evidence we applied GRADE for the main outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies met our inclusion criteria: one cluster-RCT, three CCTs, and three ITS studies. The baseline rates of sharps injuries varied from 43 to 203 injuries per 1000 HCWs per year in studies with hospital registry systems. In questionnaire-based studies, the rates of sharps injuries were higher, from 1800 to 7000 injuries per 1000 HCWs per year.  The majority of studies utilised a combination of education and training interventions, including interactive demonstrations, educational presentations, web-based information systems, and marketing tools which we found similar enough to be combined. In the only cluster-RCT (n=796) from a high-income country, the single session educational workshop decreased sharps injuries at 12 months follow-up, but this was not statistically significant either measured as registry-based reporting of injuries (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.30, low-quality evidence) or as self-reported injuries (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.21, very low-quality evidence) In three CCTs educational interventions decreased sharps injuries at two months follow-up (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.95, 330 participants, very low-quality evidence). In the meta-analysis of two ITS studies with a similar injury rate, (N=2104), the injury rate decreased immediately post-intervention by 9.3 injuries per 1000 HCWs per year (95% CI -14.9 to -3.8). There was a small non-significant decrease in trend over time post-intervention of 2.3 injuries per 1000 HCWs per year (95% CI -12.4 to 7.8, low-quality evidence). One ITS study (n=255) had a seven-fold higher injury rate compared to the other two ITS studies and only three data points before and after the intervention. The study reported a change in injury rate of 77 injuries per 1000 HCWs (95% CI -117.2 to -37.1, very low-quality evidence) immediately after the intervention, and a decrease in trend post-intervention of 32.5 injuries per 1000 HCWs per year (95% CI -49.6 to -15.4, very low quality evidence). None of the studies allowed analyses of splash exposures separately from sharps injuries. None of the studies reported rates of blood-borne infections in patients or staff. There was very low-quality evidence of short-term positive changes in process outcomes such as knowledge in sharps injuries and behaviors related to injury prevention.  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found low- to very low-quality evidence that education and training interventions may cause small decreases in the incidence of sharps injuries two to twelve months after the intervention. There was very low-quality evidence that educational interventions may improve knowledge and behaviors related to sharps injuries in the short term but we are uncertain of this effect. Future studies should focus on developing valid measures of sharps injuries for reliable monitoring. Developing educational interventions in high-risk settings is another priority.

摘要

背景

在医疗保健环境中,医护人员(HCWs)通过锐器伤和血液或体液飞溅暴露而感染传染病的风险很高。教育和培训干预措施被广泛用于保护工人的健康和安全,并预防锐器伤。在某些国家,它们是 HCWs 强制性职业发展的一部分。

目的

评估教育和培训干预措施与无干预或替代干预措施相比,预防 HCWs 锐器伤和飞溅暴露的效果。

检索方法

我们检索了 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、NHSEED、Science Citation Index Expanded、CINAHL 和 OSH-update(从所有时间到 2016 年 2 月)。此外,我们还检索了 Global Health、AustHealth 和 Web of Science 的数据库(从所有时间到 2016 年 2 月)。2019 年 11 月重新运行了原始搜索策略,并于 2020 年 2 月再次运行。2020 年 4 月,更新了搜索策略,并在 CINAHL、MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Web of Science(从 2016 年到现在)中运行。

选择标准

我们考虑了随机对照试验(RCTs)、集群随机试验(cluster-RCTs)、对照临床试验(CCTs)、中断时间序列(ITS)研究设计,以及对照前后研究(CBA),这些研究评估了教育和培训干预措施对锐器伤和飞溅暴露发生率的影响与无干预相比。

数据收集和分析

两名作者(SC、HL)独立选择研究,并提取纳入研究的数据。根据其设计类型,使用随机效应荟萃分析对研究进行分析、评估偏倚风险(HL、JL),并进行合并。我们主要关注锐器伤和飞溅暴露,并将其计算为每 1000 名医护人员每年受伤的发生率。对于主要结局,我们应用 GRADE 评估证据质量。

主要结果

有 7 项研究符合纳入标准:1 项集群 RCT、3 项 CCTs 和 3 项 ITS 研究。具有医院登记系统的研究中,锐器伤的基线发生率从每 1000 名 HCWs 每年 43 例到 203 例不等。在基于问卷调查的研究中,锐器伤的发生率更高,从每 1000 名 HCWs 每年 1800 例到 7000 例不等。大多数研究都使用了教育和培训干预措施的组合,包括互动演示、教育演示、基于网络的信息系统和营销工具,我们发现这些措施足够相似,可以组合使用。在唯一一项来自高收入国家的集群 RCT(n=796)中,为期 12 个月的随访中,单次会议教育研讨会降低了锐器伤的发生率,但这在基于登记的伤害报告(RR 0.46,95%CI 0.16 至 1.30,低质量证据)或自我报告的伤害(RR 0.41,95%CI 0.14 至 1.21,极低质量证据)中均无统计学意义。在三项 CCTs 中,教育干预措施在两个月随访时降低了锐器伤的发生率(RR 0.68,95%CI 0.48 至 0.95,330 名参与者,低质量证据)。在两项具有相似伤害率的 ITS 研究的荟萃分析中(N=2104),伤害率在干预后立即降低了 9.3 例/每 1000 名 HCWs 年(95%CI -14.9 至 -3.8)。在干预后,伤害率随时间呈轻微非显著下降趋势,每年下降 2.3 例/每 1000 名 HCWs(95%CI -12.4 至 7.8,低质量证据)。一项 ITS 研究(n=255)的伤害率比其他两项 ITS 研究高 7 倍,而且只有三个数据点在干预前后。该研究报告称,在干预后立即发生了 77 例/每 1000 名 HCWs 的伤害率变化(95%CI -117.2 至 -37.1,极低质量证据),并且在干预后伤害率随时间呈下降趋势,每年下降 32.5 例/每 1000 名 HCWs(95%CI -49.6 至 -15.4,极低质量证据)。没有一项研究能够单独分析锐器伤和飞溅暴露。没有一项研究报告了患者或医务人员的血源性感染率。有低至极低质量证据表明,短期教育和培训干预措施可能会导致锐器伤发生率的短期积极变化,如锐器伤相关知识和预防伤害行为。

作者结论

我们发现,低至极低质量证据表明,教育和培训干预措施可能会在干预后 2 至 12 个月内降低锐器伤的发生率。有低质量证据表明,教育干预措施可能会在短期内改善与锐器伤相关的知识和行为,但我们对这种效果不确定。未来的研究应重点开发可靠监测锐器伤的有效措施。在高风险环境中开发教育干预措施是另一个优先事项。

相似文献

5
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.预防职业性噪声性听力损失的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 7;7(7):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4.
8
Interventions to prevent injuries in construction workers.预防建筑工人受伤的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 5;2(2):CD006251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006251.pub4.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验