• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线讨论论坛中的基因歧视观点:加拿大论坛参与者的看法

Genetic discrimination views in online discussion forums: Perspectives from Canadian forumites.

作者信息

Dalpé Gratien, Pinkesz Miriam, Oliviero Elisabeth, Tolymbek Maria, Joly Yann

机构信息

Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2021 Dec;30(6):1613-1628. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1427. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1427
PMID:33871129
Abstract

Recent advancements in genetic technologies have made genetic information increasingly sought out in a wide range of non-therapeutic contexts, which has increased the risk that such information be used to discriminate against individuals. Frequently, it is genetic counselors who have to respond to questions about genetic discrimination (GD) from worried patients. Here, we examine the general Canadian public's knowledge, attitudes, and concerns about GD through a comprehensive analysis and categorization of posts from selected Canadian online discussion forums. Overall, we collected 1,638 posts, from which we coded 694 posts originating from newspaper comment sections and Reddit posts that were categorized to yield 6 main themes that consistently concerned Canadian users on the topics of GD: (a) discussions centered around how insurance business practices can be affected by genetic information; (b) issues in employment; (c) 'fear' of genetic testing and eugenics; (d) preventive approaches such as law and human rights instruments; (e) the predictive value and privacy that should be conferred to genetic information; and (f) other ethical issues. Overall, discussions addressed risk stratification models applied to genetic information and personal insurance underwriting. We find that many forum users (aka forumites) fear GD in insurance and employment, consider genetic information private, and strongly support different legal approaches to prevent GD. However, we find dissension among forumites that may represent different advocacy groups such as insurers and employers. From these important concerns and social conceptions, we discuss issues that should be taken into consideration for the development of future policies and information campaigns addressing GD in Canada and other countries.

摘要

基因技术的最新进展使得在广泛的非治疗背景下,人们越来越多地寻求基因信息,这增加了此类信息被用于歧视个人的风险。通常,遗传咨询师不得不回应忧心忡忡的患者关于基因歧视(GD)的问题。在此,我们通过对加拿大选定在线讨论论坛的帖子进行全面分析和分类,来审视加拿大公众对基因歧视的了解、态度和担忧。总体而言,我们收集了1638篇帖子,从中筛选出694篇源自报纸评论区和Reddit帖子的内容,并将其分类,得出6个主要主题,这些主题一直是加拿大用户在基因歧视话题上所关注的:(a)围绕保险业务操作如何受到基因信息影响展开的讨论;(b)就业方面的问题;(c)对基因检测和优生学的“恐惧”;(d)法律和人权工具等预防措施;(e)应赋予基因信息的预测价值和隐私性;(f)其他伦理问题。总体而言,讨论涉及应用于基因信息和个人保险承保的风险分层模型。我们发现,许多论坛用户(即“坛友”)担心保险和就业方面的基因歧视,认为基因信息是私密的,并强烈支持采用不同法律手段来预防基因歧视。然而,我们发现坛友之间存在分歧,这些分歧可能代表了不同的利益群体,如保险公司和雇主。基于这些重要关切和社会观念,我们讨论了在加拿大及其他国家制定未来应对基因歧视的政策和宣传活动时应考虑的问题。

相似文献

1
Genetic discrimination views in online discussion forums: Perspectives from Canadian forumites.在线讨论论坛中的基因歧视观点:加拿大论坛参与者的看法
J Genet Couns. 2021 Dec;30(6):1613-1628. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1427. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
Studying How Individuals Who Express the Feeling of Loneliness in an Online Loneliness Forum Communicate in a Nonloneliness Forum: Observational Study.研究在在线孤独论坛中表达孤独感的个体如何在非孤独论坛中进行交流:观察性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jul 20;5(7):e28738. doi: 10.2196/28738.
3
Genetics and Personal Insurance: the Perspectives of Canadian Cancer Genetic Counselors.遗传学与个人保险:加拿大癌症遗传咨询师的观点
J Genet Couns. 2015 Dec;24(6):1022-36. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9841-9. Epub 2015 May 1.
4
Breast Cancer Risk Estimation and Personal Insurance: A Qualitative Study Presenting Perspectives from Canadian Patients and Decision Makers.乳腺癌风险评估与个人保险:一项呈现加拿大患者和决策者观点的定性研究
Front Genet. 2017 Sep 21;8:128. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00128. eCollection 2017.
5
Risk-Stratified Approach to Breast Cancer Screening in Canada: Women's Knowledge of the Legislative Context and Concerns about Discrimination from Genetic and Other Predictive Health Data.加拿大乳腺癌筛查的风险分层方法:女性对立法背景的了解以及对基因和其他预测性健康数据导致歧视的担忧。
J Pers Med. 2021 Jul 27;11(8):726. doi: 10.3390/jpm11080726.
6
Evolving perspectives on genetic discrimination in health insurance among health care providers.医疗服务提供者对健康保险中基因歧视的不断变化的看法。
Fam Cancer. 2010 Jun;9(2):253-60. doi: 10.1007/s10689-009-9308-y.
7
Withdrawal method inquiries and user experiences: An analysis of content posted on 4 gendered forums on Reddit.体外排精咨询和用户体验:对 Reddit 上 4 个性别论坛发布内容的分析。
Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
8
Prevention of HIV and Other Sexually Transmissible Infections in Expatriates and Traveler Networks: Qualitative Study of Peer Interaction in an Online Forum.预防外派人员和旅行者群体中的艾滋病毒及其他性传播感染:在线论坛中同伴互动的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 5;20(9):e10787. doi: 10.2196/10787.
9
Scope, Themes, and Medical Accuracy of eHealth Peripheral Artery Disease Community Forums.电子健康外周动脉疾病社区论坛的范围、主题及医学准确性
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;54:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
10
Health and kinship matter: Learning about direct-to-consumer genetic testing user experiences via online discussions.健康与亲情的重要性:通过网络讨论了解直接面向消费者的基因检测用户体验。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 8;15(9):e0238644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238644. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Revolutionising Cardio-Oncology Care with Precision Genomics.精准基因组学彻底变革心血管肿瘤学护理
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Feb 26;26(5):2052. doi: 10.3390/ijms26052052.
2
Multisystem Proteinopathy Due to Mutations: A Review of Clinical Heterogeneity and Genetic Diagnosis.多种系统蛋白病与突变:临床异质性和遗传诊断的综述。
Genes (Basel). 2022 May 27;13(6):963. doi: 10.3390/genes13060963.