• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外排精咨询和用户体验:对 Reddit 上 4 个性别论坛发布内容的分析。

Withdrawal method inquiries and user experiences: An analysis of content posted on 4 gendered forums on Reddit.

机构信息

Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Section of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, United States.

出版信息

Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.005
PMID:33852898
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Limited research and guidance on the use of "withdrawal" or coitus interruptus for contraception lead to inconsistent or even inaccurate physician recommendations regarding its use. Consequently, patients rely on online communities to learn about this commonly used contraceptive method. To identify knowledge gaps and concerns between men and women, as well as explore how they use withdrawal, we examined withdrawal-related posts on the popular internet discussion forum, Reddit.

STUDY DESIGN

To explore gendered variations in withdrawal-related Reddit posts, we extracted posts from the gendered forums: "TwoXChromosomes," "Askwomen," "Askmen," and "OneY" between 2010 and 2019 that contained the search terms: "coitus interruptus," "withdrawal," "pull out," "preejaculate," or "precum." We developed an initial codebook with expected codes and augmented it with emerging findings from a random sampling of 10% of posts. We revised iteratively for interrater agreement, after which researchers coded the remaining posts independently.

RESULTS

Of 269 withdrawal-related queries, 19% were submitted by men; 81% referenced the contributor's own withdrawal use. Salient domains included: concerns about pregnancy risk (59%), how to effectively use withdrawal (13%), benefits/pleasure from using withdrawal (12%), impact on personal life/relationship (9%), and problems encountered, inclusive of consent (7%). Posts to female-focused forums more frequently inquired about pregnancy risk, while those on male forums more frequently inquired about withdrawal-related logistics (p < 0.001); domains were not associated with contributor gender.

CONCLUSION

Withdrawal-related queries within this Reddit sample are frequently posted by women, the majority of whom want to understand their risk of pregnancy with withdrawal. Research operationalizing withdrawal and more accurately estimating withdrawal-related pregnancy risk is warranted.

IMPLICATIONS

Reddit users discuss their personal experiences with withdrawal as contraception, as well as seek advice regarding its use from the online community. Pregnancy risk, logistics of use, and ongoing stigma are salient topics. Further research on pregnancy risk, operationalizing success, and approaches for discussing this behavioral method is warranted.

摘要

目的

关于“体外排精”或中断性交作为避孕方法的使用,相关研究和指导有限,导致医生对此的建议不一致,甚至不准确。因此,患者依赖于在线社区来了解这种常用的避孕方法。为了确定男性和女性之间的知识差距和关注点,并探讨他们如何使用体外排精,我们研究了流行的互联网讨论论坛 Reddit 上与体外排精相关的帖子。

研究设计

为了探索与体外排精相关的 Reddit 帖子中的性别差异,我们从以下性别论坛中提取了帖子:2010 年至 2019 年间的“TwoXChromosomes”、“Askwomen”、“Askmen”和“OneY”,其中包含搜索词:“coitus interruptus”、“withdrawal”、“pull out”、“preejaculate”或“precum”。我们制定了一个初始代码本,其中包含预期的代码,并从 10%的帖子中随机抽样得出的新发现中进行了扩充。我们反复修订以达到评分者间的一致性,之后研究人员独立对其余帖子进行了编码。

结果

在 269 个与体外排精相关的查询中,19%是男性提交的;81%提到了贡献者自己使用体外排精的情况。突出的领域包括:对怀孕风险的担忧(59%)、如何有效地使用体外排精(13%)、使用体外排精的好处/乐趣(12%)、对个人生活/关系的影响(9%)以及遇到的问题,包括同意(7%)。女性关注论坛上的帖子更频繁地询问怀孕风险,而男性关注论坛上的帖子更频繁地询问与体外排精相关的后勤问题(p<0.001);领域与贡献者的性别无关。

结论

在这个 Reddit 样本中,与体外排精相关的查询经常由女性发布,其中大多数人希望了解她们在使用体外排精时怀孕的风险。有必要对体外排精进行研究并更准确地估计体外排精相关的怀孕风险。

意义

Reddit 用户讨论他们个人使用体外排精作为避孕的经验,以及向在线社区寻求关于其使用的建议。怀孕风险、使用的后勤问题和持续的污名化是突出的话题。进一步研究怀孕风险、操作成功以及讨论这种行为方法的方法是必要的。

相似文献

1
Withdrawal method inquiries and user experiences: An analysis of content posted on 4 gendered forums on Reddit.体外排精咨询和用户体验:对 Reddit 上 4 个性别论坛发布内容的分析。
Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
2
Most Patients With Bone Sarcomas Seek Emotional Support and Information About Other Patients' Experiences: A Thematic Analysis.大多数骨肉瘤患者寻求情感支持和其他患者经验的信息:主题分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):161-171. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002761. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
Posting patterns in peer online support forums and their associations with emotions and mood in bipolar disorder: Exploratory analysis.双相障碍患者在同伴在线支持论坛中的发帖模式及其与情绪和心境的关联:探索性分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 25;18(9):e0291369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291369. eCollection 2023.
4
Understanding user communication around loneliness on online forums.理解用户在在线论坛上围绕孤独感进行的交流。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 23;16(9):e0257791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257791. eCollection 2021.
5
Exploring Language Used in Posts on r/birthcontrol: Case Study Using Data From Reddit Posts and Natural Language Processing to Advance Contraception Research.探索 r/birthcontrol 帖子中使用的语言:使用 Reddit 帖子数据和自然语言处理推进避孕研究的案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 30;25:e46342. doi: 10.2196/46342.
6
Social Media and Dermatology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analyzing User-Submitted Posts Seeking Dermatologic Advice on Reddit.新冠疫情期间的社交媒体与皮肤病学:分析在Reddit上寻求皮肤科建议的用户提交帖子
Cureus. 2023 Jan 12;15(1):e33720. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33720. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Online community queries on hormonal male contraception: An analysis of the Reddit "Ask Me Anything" experience.在线社区对男性荷尔蒙避孕的咨询:对 Reddit“问我任何事”经验的分析。
Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.02.009. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
8
Studying How Individuals Who Express the Feeling of Loneliness in an Online Loneliness Forum Communicate in a Nonloneliness Forum: Observational Study.研究在在线孤独论坛中表达孤独感的个体如何在非孤独论坛中进行交流:观察性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jul 20;5(7):e28738. doi: 10.2196/28738.
9
Codeine Addiction and Internet Forum Use and Support: Qualitative Netnographic Study.可待因成瘾与互联网论坛的使用及支持:定性网络民族志研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Apr 25;6(4):e12354. doi: 10.2196/12354.
10
Public Perceptions and Discussions of Premium Cigars on Reddit.Reddit上关于高档雪茄的公众认知与讨论。
medRxiv. 2023 Jun 29:2023.06.22.23291751. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.22.23291751.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study of sexuality and contraceptive choice among women using withdrawal.一项关于采用体外射精法的女性的性取向及避孕选择的定性研究。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Aug 2. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01148-w.
2
Using Natural Language Processing to Describe the Use of an Online Community for Abortion During 2022: Dynamic Topic Modeling Analysis of Reddit Posts.利用自然语言处理描述2022年一个堕胎在线社区的使用情况:Reddit帖子的动态主题建模分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jul 9;5:e72771. doi: 10.2196/72771.
3
YouTube and the implementation and discontinuation of the oral contraceptive pill: A mixed-method content analysis.
YouTube 与口服避孕药的推广和停用:一项混合方法的内容分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 24;19(5):e0302316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302316. eCollection 2024.
4
Advances in Male Contraception: When Will the Novel Male Contraception be Available?男性避孕的进展:新型男性避孕药何时可用?
World J Mens Health. 2024 Jul;42(3):487-501. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230118. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
5
Exploring Language Used in Posts on r/birthcontrol: Case Study Using Data From Reddit Posts and Natural Language Processing to Advance Contraception Research.探索 r/birthcontrol 帖子中使用的语言:使用 Reddit 帖子数据和自然语言处理推进避孕研究的案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 30;25:e46342. doi: 10.2196/46342.
6
[Contraception on YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok : A content and quality analysis].[YouTube、Instagram和TikTok上的避孕内容:一项内容与质量分析]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Sep;66(9):990-999. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03698-0. Epub 2023 May 9.
7
[Contraception in the German-language Wikipedia: a content and quality analysis].[德语维基百科中的避孕内容:一项内容与质量分析]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jun;65(6):706-717. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03537-8. Epub 2022 Apr 26.