• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日常生活中代词使用的波动:理解情境中的夫妻攻击行为。

Fluctuations in pronoun use in everyday life: Understanding couple aggression in context.

机构信息

Center for Children and Families.

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2021 Mar;35(2):149-159. doi: 10.1037/fam0000699.

DOI:10.1037/fam0000699
PMID:33871276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8386250/
Abstract

Everyday language use, including the pronouns people choose when speaking to romantic partners, may reflect underlying aspects of relationship functioning and may have important implications for understanding couple conflict and dating aggression more generally. The current study measured couples' hour-to-hour "we," "I," and "you" speech in daily life and examined symmetry in pronoun use, or the extent to which partners mirror each other in the frequency of the pronouns they use. First, we examined associations between symmetry in pronoun use and overall levels of dating aggression. Second, we investigated whether aggressive couples evidence patterns of pronoun use distinct from nonaggressive couples when they become annoyed with each other. Multilevel models showed that symmetry in "we" speech and symmetry in "I" speech each were related to lower levels of dating aggression. In addition, symmetry in couples' "you" speech increased during hours of annoyance, but only among those couples reporting high levels of aggression in their relationships. These results demonstrate how everyday language use relates to couples' general tendencies toward aggression and how such patterns are linked to ongoing fluctuations in the emotional tone of the relationship. The discussion focuses on implications for intervention and the use of novel ambulatory assessment methods for capturing couple processes in real-life contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

日常语言的使用,包括人们与浪漫伴侣交谈时选择的代词,可能反映了关系功能的潜在方面,并可能对理解夫妻冲突和约会攻击行为具有重要意义。本研究在日常生活中测量了夫妻每小时的“我们”、“我”和“你”的言语,并考察了代词使用的对称性,即伴侣在使用代词的频率上相互呼应的程度。首先,我们考察了代词使用的对称性与约会攻击行为总体水平之间的关联。其次,我们调查了当夫妻彼此生气时,攻击性夫妻的代词使用模式是否与非攻击性夫妻不同。多层次模型表明,“我们”言语的对称性和“我”言语的对称性都与较低水平的约会攻击行为有关。此外,夫妻“你”言语的对称性在生气的时间里增加,但仅在那些报告关系中存在高攻击性的夫妻中增加。这些结果表明了日常语言的使用如何与夫妻的一般攻击倾向有关,以及这些模式如何与关系的情感基调的持续波动有关。讨论的重点是干预的意义以及使用新型的动态评估方法在现实生活情境中捕捉夫妻关系的过程。(美国心理协会,2021)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7368/8386250/652b319a1ca0/nihms-1725539-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7368/8386250/c0e2e7d3e963/nihms-1725539-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7368/8386250/652b319a1ca0/nihms-1725539-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7368/8386250/c0e2e7d3e963/nihms-1725539-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7368/8386250/652b319a1ca0/nihms-1725539-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Fluctuations in pronoun use in everyday life: Understanding couple aggression in context.日常生活中代词使用的波动:理解情境中的夫妻攻击行为。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Mar;35(2):149-159. doi: 10.1037/fam0000699.
2
A day in the life: Couples' everyday communication and subsequent relationship outcomes.日常生活中的一天:夫妻之间的日常沟通及其对后续关系结果的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):453-465. doi: 10.1037/fam0001180. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
3
Family-of-origin aggression, dating aggression, and physiological stress reactivity in daily life.原生家庭攻击性、约会期攻击性与日常生活中的生理压力反应性。
Physiol Behav. 2019 Jul 1;206:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
4
An interdependence account of sexism and power: Men's hostile sexism, biased perceptions of low power, and relationship aggression.性别歧视与权力的相互依赖关系:男性的敌意性别歧视、对低权力的偏见认知与关系侵犯。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Aug;117(2):338-363. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000167. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
Association between romantic partners' rumination and couples' conflict is moderated by respiratory sinus arrhythmia.伴侣间的沉思与夫妻冲突的关系受呼吸窦性心律失常的调节。
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Sep;33(6):640-648. doi: 10.1037/fam0000544. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
Relationship satisfaction, feelings of closeness and annoyance, and linkage in electrodermal activity.关系满意度、亲近感和烦恼感与皮肤电活动的联系。
Emotion. 2023 Oct;23(7):1815-1828. doi: 10.1037/emo0001201. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
7
The interplay between interpersonal stress and psychological intimate partner violence over time for young at-risk couples.人际压力与心理亲密伴侣暴力随时间对处于危险中的年轻夫妇的相互作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Apr;42(4):619-32. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9911-y. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
8
A Matter of the Heart: Daytime Relationship Functioning and Overnight Heart Rate in Young Dating Couples.心之所系:年轻约会情侣的日间关系功能与夜间心率。
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Oct 1;54(10):794-803. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa019.
9
Applying relationship science to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic may impact couples' relationships.运用关系科学评估 COVID-19 大流行可能如何影响夫妻关系。
Am Psychol. 2021 Apr;76(3):438-450. doi: 10.1037/amp0000714. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
10
Dating Aggression and Observed Behaviors in a Nonconflictual Situation: The Role of Negative Anticipation.约会中的侵犯行为和非冲突情境下的观察行为:负面预期的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Oct;37(19-20):NP18215-NP18237. doi: 10.1177/08862605211035877. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
You-talk in young adult couples' conflict: Family-of-origin roots and adult relational aggression sequelae.年轻成年情侣冲突中的你来我往:原生家庭根源与成年期关系性攻击后遗症
J Soc Pers Relat. 2024 Dec;41(12):3641-3664. doi: 10.1177/02654075241270998. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
A day in the life: Couples' everyday communication and subsequent relationship outcomes.日常生活中的一天:夫妻之间的日常沟通及其对后续关系结果的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2024 Apr;38(3):453-465. doi: 10.1037/fam0001180. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Family-of-origin aggression, dating aggression, and physiological stress reactivity in daily life.原生家庭攻击性、约会期攻击性与日常生活中的生理压力反应性。
Physiol Behav. 2019 Jul 1;206:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
2
Automated sensing of daily activity: A new lens into development.日常活动的自动感知:发展的新视角。
Dev Psychobiol. 2019 Apr;61(3):444-464. doi: 10.1002/dev.21831. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
3
New Evaluation of the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR): Obtrusiveness, Compliance, and Participant Self-selection Effects.
电子激活记录仪(EAR)的新评估:干扰性、依从性和参与者自我选择效应
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 28;8:658. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00658. eCollection 2017.
4
Partner Pronoun Use, Communal Coping, and Abstinence during Couple-Focused Intervention for Problematic Alcohol Use.针对酒精使用问题的夫妻聚焦干预中伴侣代词的使用、共同应对与戒酒
Fam Process. 2017 Jun;56(2):348-363. doi: 10.1111/famp.12202. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
5
Prevalence of teen dating violence and co-occurring risk factors among middle school youth in high-risk urban communities.高风险城市社区中青少年约会暴力及并发风险因素在中学生中的流行情况。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Feb;56(2 Suppl 2):S5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.019.
6
Couples with dementia: Positioning the 'we'.患有痴呆症的夫妻:定位“我们”。
Dementia (London). 2015 Nov;14(6):716-33. doi: 10.1177/1471301213506923. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
7
Asymmetric partner pronoun use and demand-withdraw interaction in couples coping with health problems.在应对健康问题的夫妻中,非对称伙伴代词使用与需求-退出互动。
J Fam Psychol. 2013 Oct;27(5):691-701. doi: 10.1037/a0034184.
8
Linguistic indicators of wives' attachment security and communal orientation during military deployment.军人部署期间妻子依恋安全性和公共导向的语言指标。
Fam Process. 2013 Sep;52(3):535-54. doi: 10.1111/famp.12031. Epub 2013 May 14.
9
We-talk, communal coping, and cessation success in a couple-focused intervention for health-compromised smokers.夫妻聚焦干预措施中共同应对与戒烟成功对健康受损吸烟者的影响。
Fam Process. 2012 Mar;51(1):107-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01388.x.
10
College students' electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors.大学生在友谊和恋爱关系中的电子受害情况:预期困扰及与危险行为的关联。
Violence Vict. 2011;26(4):410-29. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.26.4.410.