• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国实现骨科手术中的性别均等需要多长时间?对国家供应商标识符注册中心的分析。

How Long Will It Take to Reach Gender Parity in Orthopaedic Surgery in the United States? An Analysis of the National Provider Identifier Registry.

机构信息

A. J. Acuña, T. K. Jella, L. T. Samuel, S. H. Jeong, A. F. Kamath, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.

E. H. Sato, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jun 1;479(6):1179-1189. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001724.

DOI:10.1097/CORR.0000000000001724
PMID:33871403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8133193/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although previous studies have evaluated how the proportion of women in orthopaedic surgery has changed over time, these analyses have been limited by small sample sizes, have primarily used data on residents, and have not included information on growth across subspecialties and geographic regions.

QUESTION/PURPOSE: We used the National Provider Identifier registry to ask: How have the (1) overall, (2) regional, and (3) subspecialty percentages of women among all currently practicing orthopaedic providers changed over time in the United States?

METHODS

The National Provider Identifier Registry of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) was queried for all active providers with taxonomy codes pertaining to orthopaedic subspecialties as of April 2020. Women orthopaedic surgeons were identified among all physicians with subspecialty taxonomy codes. As all providers are required to provide a gender when applying for an NPI, all providers with queried taxonomy codes additionally had gender classification. Our final cohort consisted of 31,296 practicing orthopaedic surgeons, of whom 8% (2363 of 31,296) were women. A total of 11,714 (37%) surgeons possessed taxonomy codes corresponding with a specific orthopaedic subspecialty. A univariate linear regression analysis was used to analyze trends in the annual proportions of women who are active orthopaedic surgeons based on NPI enumeration dates. Specifically, annual proportions were defined using cross-sections of the NPI registry on December 31 of each year. Linear regression was similarly used to evaluate changes in the annual proportion of women orthopaedic surgeons across United States Census regions and divisions, as well as orthopaedic subspecialties. The national growth rate was then projected forward to determine the year at which the representation of women orthopaedic surgeons would achieve parity with the proportion of all women physicians (36.3% or 340,018 of 936,254, as determined by the 2019 American Medical Association Physician Masterfile) and the proportion of all women in the United States (50.8% or 166,650,550 of 328,239,523 as determined by 2019 American Community Survey from the United States Census Bureau). Gender parity projections along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Holt-Winters forecasting algorithm. The proportions of women physicians and women in the United States were assumed to remain fixed at 2019 values of 36.3% and 50.8%, respectively.

RESULTS

There was a national increase in the proportion of women orthopaedic surgeons between 2010 and 2019 (r2 = 0.98; p < 0.001) at a compound annual growth rate of 2%. Specifically, the national proportion of orthopaedic surgeons who were women increased from 6% (1670 of 26,186) to 8% (2350 of 30,647). Assuming constant growth at this rate following 2019, the time to achieve gender parity with the overall medical profession (that is, to achieve 36.3% women in orthopaedic surgery) is projected to be 217 years, or by the year 2236. Likewise, the time to achieve gender parity with the overall US population (which is 50.8% women) is projected to be 326 years, or by the year 2354. During our study period, there were increases in the proportion of women orthopaedic surgeons across US Census regions. The lowest growth was in the West (17%) and the South (19%). Similar growth was demonstrated across census divisions. In each orthopaedic subspecialty, we found increases in the proportion of women surgeons throughout the study period. Adult reconstruction (0%) and spine surgery (1%) had the lowest growth.

CONCLUSION

We calculate that at the current rate of change, it will take more than 200 years for orthopaedic surgery to achieve gender parity with the overall medical profession. Although some regions and subspecialties have grown at comparably higher rates, collectively, there has been minimal growth across all domains.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Given this meager growth, we believe that substantive changes must be made across all levels of orthopaedic education and leadership to steepen the current curve. These include mandating that all medical school curricula include dedicated exposure to orthopaedic surgery to increase the number of women coming through the orthopaedic pipeline. Additionally, we believe the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and individual programs should require specific benchmarks for the proportion of orthopaedic faculty and fellowship program directors, as well as for the proportion of incoming trainees, who are women. Furthermore, we believe there should be a national effort led by American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and orthopaedic subspecialty societies to foster the academic development of women in orthopaedic surgery while recruiting more women into leadership positions. Future analyses should evaluate the efficacy of diversity efforts among other surgical specialties that have achieved or made greater strides toward gender parity, as well as how these programs can be implemented into orthopaedic surgery.

摘要

背景

尽管之前的研究评估了整形外科手术中女性比例随时间的变化,但这些分析受到样本量小、主要使用居民数据以及不包括跨专业和地理区域增长信息的限制。

问题/目的:我们使用国家提供者标识符注册表询问:在美国,(1)总体而言,(2)区域,(3)女性在所有目前执业的整形外科医生中的比例随时间如何变化?

方法

美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的国家提供者标识符注册表查询了截至 2020 年 4 月所有具有整形外科专业分类代码的活跃提供者。在具有专业分类代码的所有医生中确定了女性整形外科医生。由于所有提供者在申请 NPI 时都必须提供性别,因此所有具有查询分类代码的提供者都有性别分类。我们的最终队列包括 31296 名执业整形外科医生,其中 8%(2363 名/31296 名)为女性。共有 11714 名(37%)外科医生拥有与特定整形外科专业相对应的分类代码。使用单变量线性回归分析来分析基于 NPI 计数日期的活跃整形外科医生的年度女性比例趋势。具体来说,每年的比例是通过每年 12 月 31 日的 NPI 注册表的横断面定义的。线性回归同样用于评估美国人口普查区域和分区以及整形外科专业中女性整形外科医生的年度比例变化。然后预测全国增长率,以确定女性整形外科医生的代表性将达到与所有女性医生(根据 2019 年美国医学协会医师主文件确定为 36.3%或 340,018 名/936,254 名)和美国所有女性(根据 2019 年美国社区调查确定为 50.8%或 166,650,550 名/328,239,523 名)的比例相等的年份。使用 Holt-Winters 预测算法计算性别均等的预测值以及相应的 95%置信区间。假设女性医生和美国女性的比例分别保持在 2019 年的 36.3%和 50.8%,分别为 2019 年的值。

结果

2010 年至 2019 年期间,女性整形外科医生的比例在全国范围内有所增加(r2 = 0.98;p <0.001),复合年增长率为 2%。具体来说,女性整形外科医生的全国比例从 6%(1670 名/26186 名)增加到 8%(2350 名/30647 名)。假设按照这一速度持续增长,那么与整个医学领域(即整形外科中达到 36.3%的女性)实现性别均等的时间预计为 217 年,即到 2236 年。同样,与美国总人口(占 50.8%的女性)实现性别均等的时间预计为 326 年,即到 2354 年。在我们的研究期间,美国人口普查区域的女性整形外科医生比例有所增加。西部(17%)和南部(19%)的增长最低。在每个人口普查分区都观察到类似的增长。在每个整形外科专业中,我们在整个研究期间都发现了女性外科医生比例的增加。成人重建(0%)和脊柱外科(1%)的增长最低。

结论

我们计算出,按照目前的变化速度,整形外科要达到与整个医学领域的性别均等还需要 200 多年的时间。尽管一些地区和专业的增长速度相对较高,但总体而言,所有领域的增长都微不足道。

临床相关性

鉴于这种微不足道的增长,我们认为必须在所有层面的整形外科教育和领导中进行实质性的变革,以加深当前的曲线。这包括要求所有医学院校课程都包含专门的整形外科课程,以增加通过整形外科管道的女性人数。此外,我们认为,研究生医学教育认证委员会和各个项目应该要求整形外科教师和奖学金项目主任的比例,以及新学员的比例,具体规定为女性。此外,我们认为应该由美国骨科医师学会和骨科专业协会领导一项全国性的努力,在招募更多女性进入领导层的同时,促进女性在骨科手术中的学术发展。未来的分析应该评估在其他已经实现或在性别均等方面取得更大进展的外科专业中多样性工作的效果,以及这些计划如何在骨科手术中实施。

相似文献

1
How Long Will It Take to Reach Gender Parity in Orthopaedic Surgery in the United States? An Analysis of the National Provider Identifier Registry.在美国实现骨科手术中的性别均等需要多长时间?对国家供应商标识符注册中心的分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jun 1;479(6):1179-1189. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001724.
2
Is Program Director Gender Associated With Gender Diversity Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs?项目主任的性别是否与骨科住院医师培训项目中的性别多样性有关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1351-1357. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003070. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
What is the Geographic Distribution of Women Orthopaedic Surgeons Throughout the United States?美国女性骨科医生的地理分布情况如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):1529-1537. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000868.
4
Are Women Proportionately Represented as Speakers at Orthopaedic Surgery Annual Meetings? A Cross-Sectional Analysis.女性在骨科外科学术会议上的发言比例是否相称?一项横断面分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Dec;478(12):2729-2740. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001359.
5
Is the Distribution of Awards Gender-balanced in Orthopaedic Surgery Societies?在骨科协会中,奖项的分布是否性别均衡?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jan 1;479(1):33-43. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001364.
6
Despite Growing Number of Women Surgeons, Authorship Gender Disparity in Orthopaedic Literature Persists Over 30 Years.尽管女性外科医生的数量不断增加,但在过去 30 多年中,骨科文献的作者性别差异仍然存在。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):1542-1552. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000849.
7
Does the Proportion of Women in Orthopaedic Leadership Roles Reflect the Gender Composition of Specialty Societies?骨科领导层中的女性比例是否反映了专业学会的性别构成?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):1572-1579. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000823.
8
ACGME Accreditation of Orthopaedic Surgery Subspecialty Fellowship Training Programs.美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)对骨外科亚专科进修培训项目的认证。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 4;96(11):e94. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01340.
9
What Are the Trends in Women's Representation Among Lead Investigators of Orthopaedic Clinical Trials?女性在骨科临床试验主要研究者中的代表性趋势如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):35-44. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002769. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
10
Women in Orthopaedic Surgery: Population Trends in Trainees and Practicing Surgeons.骨科手术中的女性:受训医师和执业医师的人口趋势。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):e116. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01291.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges for the Female Surgeon in Orthopedic Surgery - A Scoping Review.骨科手术中女性外科医生面临的挑战——一项范围综述
Orthop Res Rev. 2025 Sep 6;17:451-464. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S524482. eCollection 2025.
2
Recent U.S. Spine Surgery Malpractice Cases: A Legal Case Series Analysis From the LexisNexis Database.美国近期脊柱外科医疗事故案例:来自律商联讯数据库的法律案例系列分析
Global Spine J. 2025 Aug 21:21925682251371571. doi: 10.1177/21925682251371571.
3
How can we promote gender and sex equality in orthopaedics and traumatology surgery? Research avenues perspectives.我们如何在骨科和创伤外科促进性别平等?研究途径与展望。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 14;20(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06170-8.
4
A Pilot Study of Orthopedic Applicants Regarding Sub-internship Number, Cost, and Preferences.一项关于骨科实习申请人的实习数量、成本和偏好的试点研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 12;17(7):e87785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87785. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
The Factors Influencing the Decision to Pursue Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Vary by Race and Gender: A Survey-Based Study.影响选择骨科住院医师培训的因素因种族和性别而异:一项基于调查的研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 21;17(6):e86490. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86490. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Is There a Relationship Between Medical Student Mistreatment and Specialty Choice and Career Intentions? A Systematic Review.医学生受虐与专业选择及职业意向之间存在关联吗?一项系统综述。
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Feb 26;35(3):1777-1786. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02340-9. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Gender Differences in Medical Student Interest in Arthroplasty.医学生对关节置换术兴趣的性别差异。
Iowa Orthop J. 2025;45(1):1-8.
8
The Current State of Diversity in Orthopaedics.骨科领域的多样性现状。
J Pediatr Soc North Am. 2024 Feb 12;5(Suppl 1):561. doi: 10.55275/JPOSNA-2023-561. eCollection 2023 Feb 15.
9
The Perception of Residency Experiences Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents in the United States Differs by Race and Gender.美国骨科住院医师对住院医师培训经历的认知因种族和性别而异。
Cureus. 2025 Apr 3;17(4):e81670. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81670. eCollection 2025 Apr.
10
Factors Influencing Growth in Gender Diversity Within Orthopaedic Surgery.影响骨外科性别多样性增长的因素。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Apr 21;9(4). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00288. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

1
How Do Medical Students Perceive Diversity in Orthopaedic Surgery, and How Do Their Perceptions Change After an Orthopaedic Clinical Rotation?医学生如何看待骨科手术中的多样性,以及他们在骨科临床轮转后对多样性的看法如何变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Mar 1;479(3):434-444. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001569.
2
Proportion of Female Speakers at Academic Medical Conferences Across Multiple Specialties and Regions.学术医学会议中女性发言者的比例在多个专业和地区的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2018127. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18127.
3
Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty: An Evaluation of Gender and Racial Diversity Compared with Other Specialties.骨科手术教员:与其他专科相比的性别和种族多样性评估。
JB JS Open Access. 2020 Jun 26;5(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00009. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
4
The Gender Gap in Surgical Residencies.外科住院医师中的性别差距。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Sep 1;155(9):893-894. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2171.
5
Trends in Leadership at Orthopedic Surgery Adult Reconstruction Fellowships.骨科重建外科住院医师培训项目中的领导力发展趋势。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2671-2675. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.091. Epub 2020 May 4.
6
Closing the Gender Gap: Barriers to Success for Recruitment and Retention of the Female Orthopaedic Surgery Applicant.缩小性别差距:女性骨科手术申请人在招聘和留用方面面临的障碍。
JBJS Rev. 2020 May;8(5):e0211. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00211.
7
Gender of presenters at orthopaedic meetings reflects gender diversity of society membership.骨科会议演讲者的性别反映了社会成员的性别多样性。
J Orthop. 2019 Nov 27;19:212-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.026. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
8
Gender-related Differences in Research Productivity, Position, and Advancement Among Academic Orthopaedic Faculty Within the United States.美国学术骨科领域内男女教员在研究成果、职位和晋升方面的性别差异。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Nov 1;28(21):893-899. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00408.
9
Gender Disparities in Financial Relationships Between Industry and Orthopaedic Surgeons.行业与骨科医生财务关系中的性别差异。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Feb 19;102(4):e12. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00669.
10
Trends in Leadership at Spine Surgery Fellowships.脊柱外科住院医师培训中的领导力趋势。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 15;45(10):E594-E599. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003350.