• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

循证决策 1:批判性评价。

Evidence-Based Decision-Making 1: Critical Appraisal.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada.

出版信息

Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:389-404. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_21.

DOI:10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_21
PMID:33871855
Abstract

This chapter provides an introduction to the concept of Evidence-based Medicine (EBM) including its history, rooted in Canada and its important role in modern medicine. The chapter introduces EBM and explains the process of conducting EBM . The chapter starts with a description of the traditional hierarchy of evidence that exists in research with reference to the critical appraisal tools often used to assess the quality or credibility of individual studies. It includes a section on assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials and non-randomized studies and guidelines for reporting study findings now fully captured in the EQUATOR Network. In addition, a section on GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and the process used to determine the quality of evidence when guiding clinical decisions or developing clinical practice guidelines is included. In response to the substantial number of research syntheses being published, AMSTAR2, a tool used to critically appraise the quality and reporting of systematic reviews is described. The main focus of the chapter remains on how to critically appraise the medical literature, as one step in the EBM process. However, this process also includes an assessment of study bias and an understanding of reporting guidelines. At its basic level, critical appraisal requires an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of study design and how these in turn impact the validity and applicability of research findings. Strong critical appraisal skills are critical to evidence-based decision-making .

摘要

本章介绍了循证医学(EBM)的概念,包括其在加拿大的历史渊源及其在现代医学中的重要作用。本章介绍了 EBM 并解释了进行 EBM 的过程。本章首先描述了存在于研究中的传统证据等级,参考了常用于评估单个研究质量或可信度的关键评估工具。它包括一个关于评估随机临床试验和非随机研究中的偏倚风险的部分,并包含了现在在 EQUATOR 网络中完全捕获的研究结果报告指南。此外,还包括关于 GRADE(推荐评估、制定和评估等级)的一个部分,以及在指导临床决策或制定临床实践指南时确定证据质量的过程。针对大量发表的研究综合报告,描述了用于批判性评估系统评价质量和报告的 AMSTAR2 工具。本章的主要重点仍然是如何批判性地评估医学文献,这是 EBM 过程中的一个步骤。但是,该过程还包括对研究偏倚的评估和对报告指南的理解。在其基本水平上,批判性评估需要了解研究设计的优缺点,以及这些因素如何反过来影响研究结果的有效性和适用性。强大的批判性评估技能对于循证决策至关重要。

相似文献

1
Evidence-Based Decision-Making 1: Critical Appraisal.循证决策 1:批判性评价。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:389-404. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_21.
2
Evidence-based decision-making 1: Critical appraisal.循证决策1:批判性评价
Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1281:385-96. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_23.
3
Evidence-based medicine for neurosurgeons: introduction and methodology.神经外科医生的循证医学:引言与方法
Prog Neurol Surg. 2006;19:1-53. doi: 10.1159/000095175.
4
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
5
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中决策分析模型良好实践指南综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.
6
The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.临床前和临床研究、系统评价与荟萃分析以及临床实践指南的方法学质量评估工具:一项系统评价。
J Evid Based Med. 2015 Feb;8(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12141.
7
Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on.循证医学的进展:二十五年的历程。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):415-423. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31592-6. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
8
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 2: Randomized controlled trials.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第2部分:随机对照试验
Pain Physician. 2008 Nov-Dec;11(6):717-73.
9
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.介入性疼痛管理中的循证医学、系统评价和指南,第一部分:引言与一般考虑因素
Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):161-86.
10
[Systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals].[系统评价与荟萃分析。医疗保健专业人员重要工具的基础知识、优势与不足]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2010 Jul;45(7-8):510-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262480. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitudes of Generation Y Nurses Toward Evidence-Based Nursing Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study.Y 世代护士对循证护理实践的态度:一项混合方法研究。
Nurs Open. 2025 Jun;12(6):e70257. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70257.
2
Evaluating the role of sarcopenia in adverse clinical outcomes for Crohn's disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估肌肉减少症在克罗恩病患者不良临床结局中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Feb 11;40(1):35. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04828-7.
3
Assessing the Integrity of Clinical Trials Included in Evidence Syntheses.
评估纳入证据综合的临床试验的完整性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 15;20(12):6138. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126138.
4
Critical Appraisal Tools to Aid Pharmacists in Evidence-Based Practice: A Narrative Review.帮助药剂师进行循证实践的批判性评价工具:一项叙述性综述。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Mar 1;76(2):131-140. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.3281. eCollection 2023 Spring.