Faculty of Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:389-404. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_21.
This chapter provides an introduction to the concept of Evidence-based Medicine (EBM) including its history, rooted in Canada and its important role in modern medicine. The chapter introduces EBM and explains the process of conducting EBM . The chapter starts with a description of the traditional hierarchy of evidence that exists in research with reference to the critical appraisal tools often used to assess the quality or credibility of individual studies. It includes a section on assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials and non-randomized studies and guidelines for reporting study findings now fully captured in the EQUATOR Network. In addition, a section on GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and the process used to determine the quality of evidence when guiding clinical decisions or developing clinical practice guidelines is included. In response to the substantial number of research syntheses being published, AMSTAR2, a tool used to critically appraise the quality and reporting of systematic reviews is described. The main focus of the chapter remains on how to critically appraise the medical literature, as one step in the EBM process. However, this process also includes an assessment of study bias and an understanding of reporting guidelines. At its basic level, critical appraisal requires an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of study design and how these in turn impact the validity and applicability of research findings. Strong critical appraisal skills are critical to evidence-based decision-making .
本章介绍了循证医学(EBM)的概念,包括其在加拿大的历史渊源及其在现代医学中的重要作用。本章介绍了 EBM 并解释了进行 EBM 的过程。本章首先描述了存在于研究中的传统证据等级,参考了常用于评估单个研究质量或可信度的关键评估工具。它包括一个关于评估随机临床试验和非随机研究中的偏倚风险的部分,并包含了现在在 EQUATOR 网络中完全捕获的研究结果报告指南。此外,还包括关于 GRADE(推荐评估、制定和评估等级)的一个部分,以及在指导临床决策或制定临床实践指南时确定证据质量的过程。针对大量发表的研究综合报告,描述了用于批判性评估系统评价质量和报告的 AMSTAR2 工具。本章的主要重点仍然是如何批判性地评估医学文献,这是 EBM 过程中的一个步骤。但是,该过程还包括对研究偏倚的评估和对报告指南的理解。在其基本水平上,批判性评估需要了解研究设计的优缺点,以及这些因素如何反过来影响研究结果的有效性和适用性。强大的批判性评估技能对于循证决策至关重要。