帮助药剂师进行循证实践的批判性评价工具:一项叙述性综述。

Critical Appraisal Tools to Aid Pharmacists in Evidence-Based Practice: A Narrative Review.

作者信息

Blanc Ariane, Ho Vivian, Cameron Jameason

机构信息

, BPharm, MSc, RPEBC, MBA, is Director of Pharmacy and Chief Clinical Pharmacist at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario.

, PharmD, was, at the time this article was prepared, a pharmacy student in the University of Toronto Leslie Dean Faculty of Pharmacy, on rotation at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario. She has now graduated from the program.

出版信息

Can J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Mar 1;76(2):131-140. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.3281. eCollection 2023 Spring.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacists and allied health researchers need to ensure that their practice is supported by current, evidence-based information. Critical appraisal tools have been developed to aid in this process.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the current landscape of critical appraisal tools and to create an aid for pharmacists and other allied health researchers to use in comparing various tools and choosing the best one for each particular study design.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of the PubMed, University of Toronto Libraries, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted in December 2021, to generate an up-to-date list of critical appraisal tools. The tools were then summarized in a descriptive table.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Review articles, original manuscripts, and tool webpages were examined to develop a comparison chart based on the user-friendliness, efficiency, comprehensiveness, and reliability of each tool.

RESULTS

Fourteen tools were found through the literature search. These tools were compared using the findings of included review articles, and a comparison chart was created to aid pharmacists and allied health researchers in selecting the appropriate tool for their practice.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many standardized critical appraisal tools that can help in assessing the quality of evidence, and the summary list of tools developed and reported here can help health care researchers to compare among them and choose the best one. No tools were found that have been specifically adapted to serve the needs of pharmacists when assessing scientific articles. Future research should examine how existing critical appraisal tools can better identify common data elements that are essential to evidence-based decision-making in pharmacy practice.

摘要

背景

药剂师和相关健康领域的研究人员需要确保他们的实践有当前基于证据的信息支持。已开发出批判性评价工具来辅助这一过程。

目的

分析批判性评价工具的当前状况,并为药剂师和其他相关健康领域的研究人员创建一种辅助工具,用于比较各种工具并为每个特定研究设计选择最佳工具。

数据来源

2021年12月对PubMed、多伦多大学图书馆和考科蓝图书馆数据库进行了文献检索,以生成最新的批判性评价工具列表。然后将这些工具汇总在一个描述性表格中。

研究选择和数据提取

审查综述文章、原始手稿和工具网页,以根据每个工具的用户友好性、效率、全面性和可靠性编制一个比较图表。

结果

通过文献检索发现了14种工具。利用纳入综述文章的研究结果对这些工具进行了比较,并创建了一个比较图表,以帮助药剂师和相关健康领域的研究人员为他们的实践选择合适的工具。

结论

有许多标准化的批判性评价工具可有助于评估证据质量,此处开发和报告的工具汇总列表可帮助医疗保健研究人员在它们之间进行比较并选择最佳工具。未发现有专门针对药剂师在评估科学文章时的需求而改编的工具。未来的研究应探讨现有的批判性评价工具如何能更好地识别对药学实践中基于证据的决策至关重要的常见数据元素。

相似文献

[5]
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.

Early Hum Dev. 2020-11

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索