• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改变健康相关行为 2:提高卫生支出的价值。

Changing Health-Related Behaviors 2: On Improving the Value of Health Spending.

机构信息

Quality of Care NL, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada.

出版信息

Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:553-569. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_30.

DOI:10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_30
PMID:33871864
Abstract

The quantity of health spending does not equate directly to the quality of healthcare. Social spending and nonmedical determinants of health impact on health outcomes. The value of health spending in the United States is limited by the high cost of goods and labor, and administrative costs, high use of low-level care, and lack of basic healthcare coverage in a substantial minority of the population. There are additional reasons for differences in the value of health spending as revealed by a comparison of Canada and Australia, where similar spending per capita results in better health system performance in Australia than in Canada. Within Canada, there are large differences between provinces in the value of health spending. Overutilization of health resources occurs when an intervention is not indicated, or of low value, or is provided at the wrong time. The Choosing Wisely Initiative is a solution for overutilization of low-value care. Recognition of the reality that effective treatments are often applied inconsistently and inappropriately has spurred the development of a science concerned with improvement of quality of care.

摘要

卫生支出的数量并不直接等同于医疗保健的质量。社会支出和健康的非医疗决定因素影响健康结果。美国卫生支出的价值受到商品和劳动力成本高、行政成本高、低水平护理使用率高以及相当一部分人口缺乏基本医疗保健覆盖的限制。加拿大和澳大利亚的卫生支出价值存在差异,这表明存在其他原因,尽管人均支出相似,但澳大利亚的卫生系统绩效优于加拿大。在加拿大内部,各省之间的卫生支出价值存在很大差异。当干预措施没有指征、价值低或在错误的时间提供时,就会发生卫生资源的过度利用。明智选择倡议是解决低价值医疗过度使用的方法。人们认识到,有效的治疗方法往往应用不一致和不适当,这促使人们发展了一门关注改善护理质量的科学。

相似文献

1
Changing Health-Related Behaviors 2: On Improving the Value of Health Spending.改变健康相关行为 2:提高卫生支出的价值。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:553-569. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_30.
2
International health care spending.国际医疗保健支出。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1986 Fall;5(3):111-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.5.3.111.
3
Costs of health care administration in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大的医疗保健管理成本。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 21;349(8):768-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022033.
4
Framing the issue of ageing and health care spending in Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States.阐述加拿大、英国和美国的老龄化与医疗保健支出问题。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2014 Jul;9(3):313-28. doi: 10.1017/S1744133114000115. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
5
States with more health care spending have better-quality health care: lessons about Medicare.医疗保健支出较高的州拥有质量更好的医疗保健:关于医疗保险的经验教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):w103-15. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.w103. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
6
The American states and Canada: a comparative analysis of health care spending.美国各州与加拿大:医疗保健支出的比较分析
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Summer;18(2):477-89. doi: 10.1215/03616878-18-2-477.
7
Payer Type and Low-Value Care: Comparing Choosing Wisely Services across Commercial and Medicare Populations.付费方类型与低价值医疗服务:比较商业保险人群与 Medicare 人群中“明智选择”服务的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):730-746. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12665. Epub 2017 Feb 19.
8
Health spending in the United States and the rest of the industrialized world.美国及其他工业化国家的医疗支出。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):903-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.903.
9
Small Decline In Low-Value Back Imaging Associated With The 'Choosing Wisely' Campaign, 2012-14.“明智选择”运动实施后,2012-2014 年低价值背部影像学检查略有下降。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Apr 1;36(4):671-679. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1263.
10
Overutilization, overutilized.过度使用,过度利用。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Apr;40(2):421-37. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2882281. Epub 2015 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus nonoperative management for first-time anterior shoulder instability: A cost-effectiveness analysis.关节镜下Bankart修复术与初次前肩不稳的非手术治疗:成本效益分析。
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Feb;16(1):59-67. doi: 10.1177/17585732231187123. Epub 2023 Jul 7.

本文引用的文献

1
The mirage of universality: Canada's failure to act on social policy and health care.普遍性的幻象:加拿大在社会政策和医疗保健方面的不作为。
CMAJ. 2020 Feb 3;192(5):E105-E106. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200085.
2
Avoidable Mortality Rates Decrease but Inequity Gaps Widen for Marginalized Neighborhoods: A Population-Based Analysis in Ontario, Canada from 1993 to 2014.避免死亡率下降,但边缘化社区的不平等差距扩大:1993 年至 2014 年加拿大安大略省的基于人群分析
J Community Health. 2020 Jun;45(3):579-597. doi: 10.1007/s10900-019-00778-8.
3
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.
美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
4
Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基层医疗中的过度检测与检测不足:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 11;8(2):e018557. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018557.
5
Effect of provincial spending on social services and health care on health outcomes in Canada: an observational longitudinal study.加拿大省级社会服务和医疗支出对健康结果的影响:一项观察性纵向研究。
CMAJ. 2018 Jan 22;190(3):E66-E71. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170132.
6
Add to cart?添加到购物车?
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Nov;61(11):937-9, 941-4.
7
The complex relationship between cost and quality in US health care.美国医疗保健中成本与质量之间的复杂关系。
Virtual Mentor. 2014 Feb 1;16(2):124-30. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2014.16.02.pfor1-1402.
8
From an ethics of rationing to an ethics of waste avoidance.从资源分配伦理到避免浪费伦理。
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 24;366(21):1949-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1203365. Epub 2012 May 2.
9
Eliminating waste in US health care.消除美国医疗保健中的浪费。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 11;307(14):1513-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.362. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
10
Examining quality and efficiency of the U.S. healthcare system.审视美国医疗体系的质量与效率。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(5):366-88. doi: 10.1108/09526861111139197.