School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
CMAJ. 2018 Jan 22;190(3):E66-E71. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170132.
Escalating health care spending is a concern in Western countries, given the lack of evidence of a direct connection between spending and improvements in health. We aimed to determine the association between spending on health care and social programs and health outcomes in Canada.
We used retrospective data from Canadian provincial expenditure reports, for the period 1981 to 2011, to model the effects of social and health spending (as a ratio, social/health) on potentially avoidable mortality, infant mortality and life expectancy. We used linear regressions, accounting for provincial fixed effects and time, and controlling for confounding variables at the provincial level.
A 1-cent increase in social spending per dollar spent on health was associated with a 0.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04% to 0.16%) decrease in potentially avoidable mortality and a 0.01% (95% CI 0.01% to 0.02%) increase in life expectancy. The ratio had a statistically nonsignificant relationship with infant mortality ( = 0.2).
Population-level health outcomes could benefit from a reallocation of government dollars from health to social spending, even if total government spending were left unchanged. This result is consistent with other findings from Canada and the United States.
在西方国家,医疗保健支出不断攀升令人担忧,因为缺乏支出与健康改善之间直接关联的证据。我们旨在确定加拿大医疗保健和社会项目支出与健康结果之间的关联。
我们使用了 1981 年至 2011 年期间加拿大省级支出报告的回顾性数据,以模型的形式来表示社会和医疗支出(作为比值,社会/医疗)对可避免死亡率、婴儿死亡率和预期寿命的影响。我们使用线性回归,考虑到省级固定效应和时间,并在省级层面上控制混杂变量。
每增加 1 分钱的社会支出用于每 1 美元的医疗支出,与可避免死亡率降低 0.1%(95%置信区间 [CI]:0.04%至 0.16%)和预期寿命增加 0.01%(95% CI:0.01%至 0.02%)相关。该比值与婴儿死亡率呈统计学上无显著关系( = 0.2)。
即使政府总支出保持不变,从医疗保健向社会支出重新分配资金,可能会使人群健康结果受益。这一结果与加拿大和美国的其他研究结果一致。