• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精索阻滞系列作为慢性阴囊内容物疼痛的微创治疗方法。

Spermatic Cord Block Series as a Minimally Invasive Therapy for Chronic Scrotal Content Pain.

机构信息

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Urol. 2021 Sep;206(3):725-732. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001777. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000001777
PMID:33872052
Abstract

PURPOSE

The primary aim of our study was to evaluate relief of chronic scrotal content pain after a series of spermatic cord blocks with a combination of local anesthetic and a steroid. Secondary aims were to assess factors associated with a positive response and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent spermatic cord block series for chronic scrotal content pain at our practice between 2012 and 2019. Pain scores were compared before and after treatment using an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. We performed univariate analysis to assess differences between responders and nonresponders, and the relationship between symptom duration and response was analyzed by rank-order correlation.

RESULTS

We included 44 men with chronic scrotal content pain present for a median duration of 24 months who underwent a spermatic cord block series. At a median followup of 16 months, 31 patients (70.5%) experienced sustained relief, including 9 patients (20.5%) with complete resolution of pain. There were no differences between responders and nonresponders in terms of symptom duration, perceived etiology, or previous treatments, and there was no association between response and duration of pain. Minor complications occurred in 5 cases (11.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Spermatic cord block series is a safe, minimally invasive treatment for men with refractory chronic scrotal content pain. Response to cord block series appears to be independent of symptom duration, perceived etiology or prior medical and surgical treatments. Future studies should be conducted to evaluate long-term durability and predictors of success.

摘要

目的

我们研究的主要目的是评估一系列精索阻滞联合局麻药和类固醇治疗慢性阴囊内容物疼痛的缓解效果。次要目的是评估与阳性反应和并发症相关的因素。

材料和方法

我们对 2012 年至 2019 年在我们诊所接受精索阻滞系列治疗的慢性阴囊内容物疼痛患者进行了回顾性图表审查。治疗前后使用 11 分数字疼痛评分量表比较疼痛评分。我们进行了单变量分析,以评估应答者和无应答者之间的差异,并通过秩相关分析评估症状持续时间与反应之间的关系。

结果

我们纳入了 44 名慢性阴囊内容物疼痛持续时间中位数为 24 个月的男性患者,他们接受了精索阻滞系列治疗。在中位数为 16 个月的随访中,31 名患者(70.5%)持续缓解,其中 9 名患者(20.5%)疼痛完全缓解。应答者和无应答者在症状持续时间、感知病因或既往治疗方面无差异,且反应与疼痛持续时间之间无关联。5 例(11.4%)出现轻微并发症。

结论

精索阻滞系列是治疗难治性慢性阴囊内容物疼痛男性患者的一种安全、微创的治疗方法。对精索阻滞系列的反应似乎与症状持续时间、感知病因或既往的医疗和手术治疗无关。未来的研究应评估长期耐久性和成功的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Spermatic Cord Block Series as a Minimally Invasive Therapy for Chronic Scrotal Content Pain.精索阻滞系列作为慢性阴囊内容物疼痛的微创治疗方法。
J Urol. 2021 Sep;206(3):725-732. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001777. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
Does a positive response to spermatic cord block predict response to microdenervation of the spermatic cord for chronic scrotal content pain?精索阻滞的阳性反应是否可预测精索微神经切断术治疗慢性阴囊内容物疼痛的反应?
J Sex Med. 2013 Mar;10(3):876-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02937.x. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
3
Microdenervation of the spermatic cord for chronic scrotal content pain: single institution review analyzing success rate after prior attempts at surgical correction.精索微神经切断术治疗慢性阴囊内容物疼痛:单机构回顾性分析既往手术矫正失败后的成功率。
J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):554-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.026. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
4
Microsurgical Spermatic Cord Denervation as a Treatment for Chronic Scrotal Content Pain: A Multicenter Open Label Trial.显微外科精索去神经术治疗慢性阴囊内容物疼痛:一项多中心开放标签试验
J Urol. 2015 Nov;194(5):1323-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.05.081. Epub 2015 May 21.
5
Targeted Robotic Assisted Microsurgical Denervation of the Spermatic Cord for the Treatment of Chronic Orchialgia or Groin Pain: A Single Center, Large Series Review.靶向机器人辅助精索神经切断术治疗慢性精索痛或腹股沟痛:单中心大系列回顾。
J Urol. 2018 Apr;199(4):1015-1022. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.030. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
6
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial Shows that Onabotulinum Toxin A Nerve Blocks do Not Provide Improved Pain Control in Men with Chronic Scrotal Pain.一项随机、双盲、对照试验表明,肉毒杆菌毒素 A 神经阻滞并不能改善慢性阴囊疼痛男性的疼痛控制。
J Urol. 2020 Apr;203(4):767-772. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000658. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
7
Prospective double-blind preoperative pain clinic screening before microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord in patients with testicular pain syndrome.睾丸疼痛综合征患者精索显微去神经术前前瞻性双盲疼痛门诊筛查。
Pain. 2014 Sep;155(9):1720-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.022. Epub 2014 May 24.
8
OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) nerve blocks provide durable pain relief for men with chronic scrotal pain: a pilot open-label trial.A型肉毒毒素(保妥适)神经阻滞为患有慢性阴囊疼痛的男性提供持久的疼痛缓解:一项开放性试点试验。
J Sex Med. 2014 Dec;11(12):3072-7. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12707. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
9
Chronic Scrotal Content Pain: a Review of the Literature and Management Schemes.慢性阴囊内容物疼痛:文献回顾与治疗方案。
Curr Urol Rep. 2021 Jan 15;22(2):12. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-01026-6.
10
Vasectomy reversal with ultrasonography-guided spermatic cord block.超声引导精索阻断的输精管复通术。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1796-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11099.x. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Contemporary approaches and treatment perspectives for chronic scrotal content pain: insights from a national practice patterns survey of reproductive urologists.慢性阴囊内容物疼痛的当代治疗方法与观点:来自生殖泌尿科医生全国实践模式调查的见解
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01101-x.
2
A simplified treatment algorithm for chronic scrotal content pain syndrome.慢性阴囊内容物疼痛综合征的简化治疗算法。
Curr Urol. 2024 Dec;18(4):251-256. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000240. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
3
Post-vasectomy Pain Syndrome: A Review of the Literature and Updated Treatment Algorithm.
输精管切除术后疼痛综合征:文献综述及更新的治疗方案
Cureus. 2025 Feb 24;17(2):e79592. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79592. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
The effect of combined pudendal nerve and spermatic cord block or caudal epidural block on postoperative analgesia after posterior urethroplasty: a randomized trial.联合阴部神经和精索阻滞或骶管阻滞对后尿道成形术后术后镇痛的影响:一项随机试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct 22;24(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02744-x.
5
Gold Standard Care of Chronic Scrotal Pain.慢性阴囊疼痛的金标准护理
Res Rep Urol. 2021 May 24;13:283-288. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S278803. eCollection 2021.