Mikosinski Jacek, Di Landro Anna, Łuczak-Szymerska Krzysztofa, Soriano Emilie, Caverzasio Carol, Binelli Daniela, Falissard Bruno, Dereure Olivier
Nzoz Mikomed, ul, Łódź, Poland.
Centro Studi GISED, Bergamo, Italy.
Wounds. 2021 Jun;33(6):147-157. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
Hyaluronic acid (HA)-containing formulations routinely are utilized along with standard therapy to promote faster healing of chronic wounds; evidence to guide clinical decisions on the use of topical HA in the healing of vascular leg ulcers is limited.
This study compared the efficacy and safety of an HA-impregnated gauze pad with an identical gauze pad without HA in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers of vascular origin.
A prospective, multicenter, multinational, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, clinical study was conducted between June 13, 2017, and December 31, 2018. Adults with 1 or more chronic leg ulcers of venous or mixed origin between 2 months and 4 years' duration were eligible to participate. Participants were randomized to treatment consisting of standard care (ie, ulcer cleansing, debridement/anesthesia as necessary, and optimized compression) and either application of a gauze pad containing 0.05% HA or a neutral comparator once daily for a maximum of 20 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete ulcer healing (100% reepithelialization of the wound area centrally assessed by 1 independent and experienced assessor blinded with respect to the treatment applied, as shown on digital photographs taken under standardized conditions at or before 20 weeks and confirmed 3 weeks later). Secondary efficacy endpoints included the percentage of completely healed target ulcers, residual area of target ulcer relative to baseline, the condition of the periulcerous skin, the total amount of analgesics used, the incidence of infection at the ulcer site of the target ulcer, patient adherence to treatment, time to achieve complete healing as centrally assessed, and pain intensity as measured by a visual analog scale.
Among the 168 participants (82 in the HA gauze pad group and 86 in the neutral gauze pad group), 33 (39.8%) in the HA group experienced complete healing of the target ulcer, which was significantly higher than the neutral comparator group (15, 18.5%; P = .002). Results in the full analysis and per-protocol sets were consistent with the primary results; no significant difference was noted in outcomes when participants' wounds were stratified according to baseline ulcer size.
HA delivered in a gauze pad formulation could be a beneficial treatment for chronic leg ulcers of venous or mixed origin.
含透明质酸(HA)的制剂通常与标准治疗一起使用,以促进慢性伤口更快愈合;关于在血管性腿部溃疡愈合中使用局部HA的临床决策的证据有限。
本研究比较了含HA的纱布垫与不含HA的相同纱布垫在治疗血管性起源的慢性腿部溃疡中的疗效和安全性。
2017年6月13日至2018年12月31日进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、跨国、平行组、随机、双盲临床研究。患有1个或更多持续时间在2个月至4年之间的静脉性或混合性起源的慢性腿部溃疡的成年人有资格参与。参与者被随机分配接受标准护理(即溃疡清洁、必要时的清创/麻醉以及优化的压迫),并每天应用一次含0.05%HA的纱布垫或中性对照物,最长持续20周。主要疗效终点是溃疡完全愈合(由1名独立且经验丰富的评估者对伤口区域进行中央评估,该评估者对所应用的治疗不知情,如在20周时或之前在标准化条件下拍摄的数码照片所示,并在3周后得到确认,伤口区域100%重新上皮化)。次要疗效终点包括目标溃疡完全愈合的百分比、目标溃疡相对于基线的残余面积、溃疡周围皮肤状况、所用镇痛药的总量、目标溃疡溃疡部位的感染发生率、患者对治疗的依从性、中央评估的完全愈合时间以及通过视觉模拟量表测量的疼痛强度。
在168名参与者中(HA纱布垫组82名,中性纱布垫组86名),HA组中有33名(39.8%)目标溃疡完全愈合,显著高于中性对照组(15名,18.5%;P = 0.002)。全分析集和符合方案集的结果与主要结果一致;根据基线溃疡大小对参与者的伤口进行分层时,结果未发现显著差异。
以纱布垫制剂形式提供的HA可能是治疗静脉性或混合性起源的慢性腿部溃疡的有益疗法。