Department of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; Department of Speech Pathology, Uniting War Memorial Hospital, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Cortex. 2021 Jun;139:178-197. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.022. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
There is little evidence that, for people with aphasia, successful outcomes following lexical retrieval treatment generalise beyond single word retrieval to sentence production or daily communication. This study aimed to develop greater understanding of the mechanisms of generalisation. We employed a cueing task to simulate the effects of lexical retrieval treatment. A single noun or verb was provided and the effect on production of a corresponding verb phrase examined. Sixteen individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) were asked to produce verb phrases to describe action pictures accompanied by i) a verb cue where a spoken and written verb was also presented with the picture; ii) a noun cue where a spoken and written noun was presented with the picture; iii) a no cue condition where only the picture was presented. Across the case series, both verb and noun cueing improved verb phrase production relative to no cue, with verb cueing being most effective. At the level of the single case, thirteen individuals showed significantly increased production of verb phrases with verb cueing, and seven individuals with noun cueing. In addition, seven individuals showed significantly greater benefit from verb cueing compared to noun cueing, and none showed the reverse. This suggests that improvements in verb phrase production may also be achievable following treatment-induced improvements in lexical retrieval. Greater benefit from verb cues than noun cues raises important theoretical issues regarding sentence construction and clinical issues around the most effective treatment techniques for people with aphasia.
针对失语症患者,词汇检索治疗后的成功结果是否能从单个单词的检索扩展到句子生成或日常交流,目前几乎没有证据表明这一点。本研究旨在更深入地了解这种泛化的机制。我们采用了一种提示任务来模拟词汇检索治疗的效果。提供一个名词或动词,然后检查对相应动词短语生成的影响。我们要求 16 名原发性进行性失语症 (PPA) 患者用动作图片描述动词短语,图片旁边伴有 i)动词提示,即图片上还呈现口头和书面形式的动词;ii)名词提示,即图片上呈现口头和书面形式的名词;iii)无提示条件,即只呈现图片。在整个病例系列中,动词和名词提示都比无提示条件下更能提高动词短语的生成,其中动词提示效果最佳。在单个病例水平上,13 名患者在使用动词提示时,动词短语的生成明显增加,7 名患者在使用名词提示时也是如此。此外,7 名患者使用动词提示的获益明显大于名词提示,没有患者的情况相反。这表明,词汇检索治疗引起的改善也可能导致动词短语生成的提高。动词提示比名词提示带来的益处更大,这引发了关于句子构建的重要理论问题以及针对失语症患者最有效的治疗技术的临床问题。