• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非信号交叉口执法摄像机的安全效果:中国的一项案例研究。

Safety effects of law enforcement cameras at non-signalized crosswalks: A case study in China.

机构信息

School of Transportation, Southeast University, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, China; Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, China.

School of Transportation, Southeast University, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, China; Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, China.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jun;156:106124. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106124. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106124
PMID:33873136
Abstract

Pedestrians are vulnerable when crossing the street, especially at non-signalized crosswalks. In China, in spite of the priority that laws entitle the pedestrians, the yielding rates at non-signalized crosswalks are relatively low. In light of this situation, law enforcement cameras have been used to increase the percentage of drivers yielding to pedestrians. This study investigates the effectiveness of law enforcement cameras on drivers yielding behavior and vehicle-pedestrian conflicts at non-signalized crosswalks. Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and roadside video recording, information including pedestrian characteristics, vehicular characteristics and environmental factors are collected. The conflict indicators used include Post-Encroachment Time (PET), Time to Collision (TTC), and Deceleration to Safety Time (DST). In this study, a conflict classification framework based on PET, TTC and DST using Support Vector Machine algorithm is employed. A multinomial logit regression model is used to identify the factors contributing to the conflicts. Then, binary logit regression models are constructed to analyze the effects of law enforcement cameras on drivers yielding behavior. Conflict study reveals that the implementation of law enforcement cameras would increase the probability of slight conflict but decrease the probability of serious conflict. Yielding behavior analysis shows that the illegitimate yielding behavior percentages are over 10 %, indicating the necessity of improving the awareness of yielding rules, and the implementation of law enforcement cameras would increase the yielding and legitimate yielding probability. Moreover, factors including the adjacent vehicle yielding behavior, number of lanes between pedestrian and vehicle, pedestrian speed change, pedestrian waiting time, pedestrian accepted gap time, vehicle upstream speed and vehicle speed change are significantly associated with conflict severity and drivers yielding behavior. We recommend that supplementary facilities and measures should be used to improve the safety performance of law enforcement cameras.

摘要

行人在过马路时很脆弱,尤其是在没有信号灯的路口。尽管中国法律赋予行人优先权,但在没有信号灯的路口,车辆让行率相对较低。鉴于这种情况,执法摄像头已被用于提高司机礼让行人的比例。本研究调查了执法摄像头对非信号灯路口司机让行行为和车人冲突的有效性。使用无人机 (UAV) 和路边视频记录,收集了包括行人和车辆特征以及环境因素等信息。冲突指标包括侵占后时间 (PET)、碰撞时间 (TTC) 和减速至安全时间 (DST)。本研究采用基于 PET、TTC 和 DST 的支持向量机算法冲突分类框架。采用多项逻辑回归模型来识别导致冲突的因素。然后,构建二项逻辑回归模型来分析执法摄像头对司机让行行为的影响。冲突研究表明,执法摄像头的实施会增加轻微冲突的概率,但会降低严重冲突的概率。让行行为分析表明,非法让行行为的比例超过 10%,这表明有必要提高让行规则的意识,执法摄像头的实施会增加让行和合法让行的概率。此外,相邻车辆让行行为、行人和车辆之间的车道数、行人速度变化、行人等待时间、行人接受间隙时间、车辆上游速度和车辆速度变化等因素与冲突严重程度和司机让行行为显著相关。我们建议应使用补充设施和措施来提高执法摄像头的安全性能。

相似文献

1
Safety effects of law enforcement cameras at non-signalized crosswalks: A case study in China.非信号交叉口执法摄像机的安全效果:中国的一项案例研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jun;156:106124. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106124. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Impacts of enforcement cameras on pedestrians' risk perception and drivers' behaviors at non-signalized crosswalks.执法相机对非信号交叉口行人和驾驶员行为的影响。
J Safety Res. 2022 Jun;81:313-325. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
3
How yielding cameras affect consecutive pedestrian-vehicle conflicts at non-signalized crosswalks? A mixed bivariate generalized ordered approach.让相机屈服如何影响无信号交叉口的连续行人和车辆冲突?混合双变量广义有序方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Dec;178:106851. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106851. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
4
Effect of a community-based pedestrian injury prevention program on driver yielding behavior at marked crosswalks.一项基于社区的行人伤害预防计划对在有标记人行横道处驾驶员让行行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Aug;93:169-178. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 18.
5
Survey about pedestrian safety and attitudes toward automated traffic enforcement in Washington, D.C.华盛顿特区行人安全与对自动化交通执法态度调查
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(4):414-23. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.830212.
6
Exploring the impact of right-turn safety measures on E-bike-heavy vehicle conflicts at signalized intersections.探索右转安全措施对信号交叉口电动自行车与机动车冲突的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Oct;206:107722. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107722. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
7
Quantitative analysis of pedestrian safety at uncontrolled multi-lane mid-block crosswalks in China.中国无控制多车道路段人行横道行人安全的定量分析
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
8
Lane-based Distance-Velocity model for evaluating pedestrian-vehicle interaction at non-signalized locations.基于车道的速度-距离模型在非信号交叉口评估行人和车辆的相互作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Oct;176:106810. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106810. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
9
A novel framework to evaluate pedestrian safety at non-signalized locations.一种评估无信号控制区域行人安全的新框架。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Feb;111:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.015.
10
Evaluation of pedestrian crossing behavior and safety at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks with different numbers of lanes in China.评价中国不同车道数的非控制路段中央横道行人过街行为和安全。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Feb;123:263-273. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 13.