• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[面对医疗协助死亡责任与保障法的家庭医学]

[Family Medicine in the face of the law on medical aid in dying responsibility and guarantees].

作者信息

Novoa-Jurado Abel, Melguizo-Jiménez Miguel

机构信息

Servicio de Urgencias Hospitalarias, Hospital General Universitario J.M. Morales Meseguer, Área VI-Vega Media del Segura, Servicio Murciano de Salud, Murcia, España.

Centro de Salud Almanjáyar, Granada, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2021 May;53(5):102058. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102058. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102058
PMID:33873137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8082086/
Abstract

The approval of the euthanasia law represents a challenge for medicine and culminates a process of civic maturation of society in the face of death. There are challenges that the application of the law will have to meet. Seeking an objective and irreversible medical solution to subjective suffering - where there may be conditioning social determinants - implies a serious risk of inequity that requires policies that establish a pre-decisional guaranteeing framework. Euthanasia should be an exception thanks to the existence of strong clinical, informational and relational safeguards that can only be guaranteed in the context of a solvent primary care that accompanies people throughout their lives. In this primarist and community context, euthanasia can be the last resort of a professional committed to not abandoning a patient with severe and irreversible suffering who requests it.

摘要

安乐死法的批准对医学来说是一项挑战,也是社会在面对死亡时公民成熟过程的 culminates(此处原文culminates一词有误,推测可能是culminate的第三人称单数形式,意为“达到顶点、告终”,这里暂按“告终”理解)。法律的实施将面临一些挑战。在可能存在社会决定因素的情况下,寻求针对主观痛苦的客观且不可逆转的医学解决方案意味着存在严重的不公平风险,这就需要制定政策来建立一个决策前的保障框架。由于存在强大的临床、信息和关系保障措施,而这些措施只有在伴随人们一生的健全初级保健背景下才能得到保证,所以安乐死应该是一种例外情况。在这种以初级保健为基础且注重社区的背景下,安乐死可以成为一名专业人员的最后手段,该专业人员致力于不抛弃有严重且不可逆转痛苦并提出请求的患者。

相似文献

1
[Family Medicine in the face of the law on medical aid in dying responsibility and guarantees].[面对医疗协助死亡责任与保障法的家庭医学]
Aten Primaria. 2021 May;53(5):102058. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102058. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
[Euthanasia: is this the law we need?].[安乐死:这是我们需要的法律吗?]
Aten Primaria. 2021 May;53(5):102057. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102057. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
3
[The provision of assisted death in the context of the desire to anticipate death].[在期望预知死亡的背景下提供协助死亡]
Aten Primaria. 2024 Sep;56(9):102895. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.102895. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
4
Palliative options of last resort: a comparison of voluntarily stopping eating and drinking, terminal sedation, physician-assisted suicide, and voluntary active euthanasia.最后的姑息治疗选择:自愿停止进食和饮水、临终镇静、医生协助自杀及自愿主动安乐死的比较
JAMA. 1997 Dec 17;278(23):2099-104. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.23.2099.
5
Dealing with requests for euthanasia: a qualitative study investigating the experience of general practitioners.应对安乐死请求:一项调查全科医生经历的定性研究
J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):150-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.020909.
6
Attitudes towards assisted suicide and euthanasia among care-dependent older adults (50+) in Austria: the role of socio-demographics, religiosity, physical illness, psychological distress, and social isolation.奥地利依赖他人照料的老年人(50岁以上)对协助自杀和安乐死的态度:社会人口统计学、宗教信仰、身体疾病、心理困扰及社会孤立的作用
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 7;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0233-6.
7
[Does the Electronic Health Record reflect the social determinants of health from Primary Health Care?].[电子健康记录能否反映初级卫生保健中的健康社会决定因素?]
Aten Primaria. 2021 Jan;53(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 May 13.
8
Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Washington State. Patient requests and physician responses.华盛顿州的医生协助自杀与安乐死。患者请求与医生回应。
JAMA. 1996 Mar 27;275(12):919-25.
9
Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective.医生协助自杀与安乐死:全球视角下的新问题
J Palliat Care. 2018 Oct;33(4):197-203. doi: 10.1177/0825859718777325. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
10
Palliative treatments of last resort: choosing the least harmful alternative. University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel.最后的姑息治疗手段:选择危害最小的方案。宾夕法尼亚大学 生物伦理中心协助自杀共识小组
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Mar 21;132(6):488-93. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-6-200003210-00011.

引用本文的文献

1
[Chemotherapy at the end of life is compatible with dignified death and palliative care].[临终时的化疗与尊严死亡及姑息治疗相兼容]
Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba. 2023 Jun 30;80(2):93-98. doi: 10.31053/1853.0605.v80.n2.37489.