• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮内试验可检出 1/4 的非即刻型青霉素过敏患者。

Intradermal Testing Identifies 1 in 4 Patients with Nonimmediate Penicillin Allergy.

机构信息

Allergy Clinic, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2021;182(9):827-834. doi: 10.1159/000515080. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1159/000515080
PMID:33873191
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intradermal testing with delayed reading (IDTdr), used routinely in many centers, may identify delayed reactions to penicillins. However, few studies have compared the results of IDTdr with drug provocation test (DPT). The aim of this study was to examine the proportion of provocation-positive patients testing positive on IDTdr.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with a positive DPT occurring >2 h after intake of penicillin V, dicloxacillin, pivampicillin, or amoxicillin had an IDTdr with penicillin G, amoxicillin, ampicillin, and dicloxacillin. A control group included 18 patients with negative DPTs with the suspected penicillin.

RESULTS

In total 25% (n = 14) of provocation-positive patients tested positive on IDTdr. Among patients with positive IDTdr, 9/14 (64%) versus 11/43 (26%) in the IDTdr negative group (p < 0.05) had required oral steroids to treat skin reactions following DPT. No other differences between IDTdr positive and negative groups were found. No controls had a positive IDTdr.

CONCLUSION

Investigating with IDTdr would have identified 25% of patients with a DPT-verified allergy with delayed reactions. It is difficult to target subgroups who will test positive on IDTdr. There were more patients who tested positive on IDT who had received oral steroids after DPT, and this may be an indication that skin reaction severity plays a role in skin testing diagnostics. Further potential predictors for positivity of IDTdr, such as duration of skin symptoms, should be assessed in large studies in order to optimize the investigations of nonimmediate drug allergic reactions.

摘要

背景

在许多中心,常规使用皮内试验(IDTdr)进行延迟读数,这可能会识别出对青霉素的延迟反应。然而,很少有研究比较 IDTdr 与药物激发试验(DPT)的结果。本研究旨在检查激发阳性患者中 IDTdr 阳性的比例。

方法

57 例青霉素 V、双氯西林、匹美西林或阿莫西林激发试验阳性>2 小时的患者进行 IDTdr,检测青霉素 G、阿莫西林、氨苄西林和双氯西林。对照组包括 18 例可疑青霉素激发试验阴性的患者。

结果

总共有 25%(n = 14)的激发阳性患者 IDTdr 阳性。在 IDTdr 阳性的患者中,9/14(64%)比 IDTdr 阴性组的 11/43(26%)(p < 0.05)需要口服类固醇来治疗 DPT 后的皮肤反应。IDTdr 阳性和阴性组之间没有发现其他差异。对照组中没有患者 IDTdr 阳性。

结论

通过 IDTdr 检测,可能会发现 25%的 DPT 证实过敏且延迟反应的患者。很难确定 IDTdr 阳性的亚组。IDTdr 阳性的患者中,有更多的患者在 DPT 后接受了口服类固醇治疗,这可能表明皮肤反应的严重程度在皮肤测试诊断中起作用。为了优化非即刻药物过敏反应的检测,应在大型研究中评估 IDTdr 阳性的其他潜在预测因子,如皮肤症状持续时间。

相似文献

1
Intradermal Testing Identifies 1 in 4 Patients with Nonimmediate Penicillin Allergy.皮内试验可检出 1/4 的非即刻型青霉素过敏患者。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2021;182(9):827-834. doi: 10.1159/000515080. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
Flucloxacillin Hypersensitivity: Patient Outcomes in a Multicenter Retrospective Study.氟氯西林过敏反应:一项多中心回顾性研究中的患者结局。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2212-2217.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
3
Diagnosing nonimmediate reactions to penicillins by in vivo tests.通过体内试验诊断对青霉素的非即刻反应。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002 Oct;129(2):169-74. doi: 10.1159/000065876.
4
Prospective assessment of diagnostic tests for pediatric penicillin allergy: From clinical history to challenge tests.前瞻性评估儿科青霉素过敏的诊断检测:从临床病史到激发试验。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Aug;121(2):235-244.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 25.
5
Piperacillin-Tazobactam Hypersensitivity: A Large, Multicenter Analysis.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦过敏反应:一项大型多中心分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 May;9(5):2001-2009. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.051. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
6
Skin testing and drug provocation in the diagnosis of nonimmediate reactions to aminopenicillins in children.儿童对氨基青霉素非速发型反应诊断中的皮肤试验和药物激发试验
Allergy. 2009 Feb;64(2):229-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01903.x.
7
Non-immediate reactions to beta-lactams: diagnostic value of skin testing and drug provocation test.β-内酰胺类药物的非即刻反应:皮肤试验和药物激发试验的诊断价值
Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 May;38(5):822-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02961.x. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
8
Drug allergy evaluation for betalactam hypersensitivity: Cross-reactivity with cephalosporines, carbapenems and negative predictive value.药物过敏评估β内酰胺类药物过敏:与头孢菌素、碳青霉烯类药物的交叉反应和阴性预测值。
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2018 Mar;36(1):27-31. doi: 10.12932/AP0853.
9
Improving the Effectiveness of Penicillin Allergy De-labeling.提高青霉素过敏标签去除的有效性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May-Jun;3(3):365-34.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.11.002. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
10
Amoxicillin hypersensitivity: Patient outcomes in a seven-year retrospective study.阿莫西林超敏反应:一项七年回顾性研究中的患者结局
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022 Oct;129(4):507-514.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.06.021. Epub 2022 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Tools to improve the diagnosis and management of T-cell mediated adverse drug reactions.改善T细胞介导的药物不良反应诊断与管理的工具
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 13;9:923991. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.923991. eCollection 2022.
2
75% negative skin test results in patients with suspected hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics: Influencing factors and interpretation of test results.对β-内酰胺类抗生素疑似过敏患者中75%的皮肤试验结果为阴性:影响因素及试验结果解读
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Nov 5;14(11):100602. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100602. eCollection 2021 Nov.