Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Ulm, Germany.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2022 Oct;160(5):526-531. doi: 10.1055/a-1398-5849. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
Fractures of the proximal femur in the elderly population are rising. Teaching the appropriate surgical treatment of these fractures is of paramount importance. The aim of the study was to evaluate differences in outcome of surgical procedures between supervised trainees and senior surgeons.
Are there more surgical complications, poorer quality or an increased operating time if the procedure (in this case: fixation of proximal femur fractures) is performed by trainees under supervision in comparison to experienced surgeons.
All patients treated with the proximal femur nail antirotation (PFNA) between 2015 and 2016 at a level one trauma centre were included in this study. The retrospective review of the 299 patients compared supervised surgical trainees and senior surgeons. Parameters included operating time, tip apex distance, position of the blade, Hb-difference, transfusion rate, surgical complications as well as mortality, and were compared between the groups.
153 of 299 procedures were performed by supervised surgical trainees. In comparison to senior surgeons, there was no significant difference in operating time (WA 54.48 min; OA 60.47 min; p > 0,05), Hb-difference (WA 2.8 g/dl; OA 2.6 g/dl; p > 0.05), tip-apex distance (WA 21.2 mm; OA 20.5 mm, p = 0.37) or rate of surgical complications. There was no difference in the rate of optimal blade positions between the groups (WA 87.5%; OA 89.0%; p = 0.366). Furthermore, mortality showed no difference between the groups, but was greater in older patients or high ASA grade.
Supervised surgical training during treatment of proximal femur fractures shows no increase in operating time, complications or mortality and no difference in quality. With the fast growth of the elderly population, surgical training of fragility fractures should receive more attention in the future.
老年人股骨近端骨折的发病率正在上升。教授这些骨折的适当手术治疗至关重要。本研究的目的是评估在有监督的受训者和资深外科医生中,手术治疗结果是否存在差异。
如果手术(在这种情况下:股骨近端骨折固定)由受训者在监督下进行,与经验丰富的外科医生相比,是否会出现更多的手术并发症、手术质量较差或手术时间延长。
本研究纳入了 2015 年至 2016 年在一家一级创伤中心接受股骨近端钉旋转(PFNA)治疗的所有患者。对 299 例患者进行回顾性研究,比较了有监督的外科受训者和资深外科医生。参数包括手术时间、尖端顶点距离、刀片位置、Hb 差异、输血率、手术并发症以及死亡率,并对两组进行了比较。
299 例手术中有 153 例由有监督的外科受训者完成。与资深外科医生相比,手术时间(WA 54.48 分钟;OA 60.47 分钟;p>0.05)、Hb 差异(WA 2.8 克/分升;OA 2.6 克/分升;p>0.05)、尖端顶点距离(WA 21.2 毫米;OA 20.5 毫米,p=0.37)或手术并发症发生率无显著差异。两组间最佳刀片位置的发生率无差异(WA 87.5%;OA 89.0%;p=0.366)。此外,两组间死亡率无差异,但在老年患者或高 ASA 分级中更高。
在治疗股骨近端骨折时,接受监督的外科培训不会增加手术时间、并发症或死亡率,也不会影响手术质量。随着老年人口的快速增长,未来应该更加重视脆性骨折的外科培训。