Shen X L, Li L, Ma J, Zhang B J, Ge Z R, Liu X Z, Zu L B Y, He Y, Jiang S B
Heart Center, Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China.
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 24;49(4):340-344. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200816-00646.
To investigate the safety and efficacy of ultrafiltration on diuretic sensitivity in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction and diuretic resistance. This was a single-center randomized controlled trial. A total of 148 heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction admitted to the Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from June 2010 to June 2020 were enrolled in this study, and these patients were randomly divided (ratio 1:1) into the ultrafiltration group (74) and the control group (=74). All patients were treated with diuretics, cardiotonic, vasodilator and other comprehensive drugs according to relevant guidelines. After grouping, the patients in the control group were treated with standard treatment plan, while patients in the ultrafiltration group were treated with ultrafiltration on top of standard therapy. Diuretic drugs were discontinued during ultrafiltration, and intravenously furosemide (40 mg) was given immediately and 24 hours after the end of ultrafiltration. Clinical data including gender, age, complicated diseases, New York Heart Association (NYHA) function classification, etc. were collected. Effectiveness indicators include urine volume (the first 12-hour and 24-hour urine volume and the second 24-hour urine volume after using diuretic), body weight and dyspnea severity score. Safety indicators include systolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, serum Na concentration, blood K concentration and the number of deaths before and after intervention. Two patients in the control group died due to worsening heart failure after randomization and were excluded in this study, 146 patients were finally analyzed (72 patients in the control group and 74 patients in the ultrafiltration group). There were 93 males, and the age was (68.3±11.2) years. There was no significant difference between patients in the ultrafiltration group and the control group in gender, age, body weight, course of disease, dyspnea severity score, NYHA function classification Ⅲ/Ⅳ, the proportion of patients with severe edema of both lower limbs, the proportion of patients with complicated diseases, and basic medication (all >0.05). After using diuretics, the urine volume of the first 12-hour and 24-hour and the second 24-hour were significantly higher in the ultrafiltration group than in the control group (all <0.05). Body weight decreased significantly after ultrafiltration treatment as compared with that before intervention in the ultrafiltration group (<0.05). Compared with the control group, the dyspnea severity score was significantly improved in the ultrafiltration group (<0.05). There was no significant difference in systolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, serum Na concentration, blood K concentration of patients between ultrafiltration group and control group before and after intervention (all >0.05). During the clinical diagnosis and treatment, 2 male patients in the control group died, and the cause of death was aggravation of basic diseases complicated with acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock. There was no death in the ultrafiltration group, and there were no obvious clinical adverse events during and after ultrafiltration. Ultrafiltration therapy is safe and can improve diuretic sensitivity in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction and diuretic resistance.
探讨超滤对射血分数降低且利尿剂抵抗的心力衰竭患者利尿剂敏感性的安全性及疗效。这是一项单中心随机对照试验。2010年6月至2020年6月在新疆维吾尔自治区中医医院收治的148例射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者纳入本研究,这些患者被随机分为(比例1:1)超滤组(74例)和对照组(74例)。所有患者均根据相关指南接受利尿剂、强心剂、血管扩张剂等综合药物治疗。分组后,对照组患者采用标准治疗方案,而超滤组患者在标准治疗基础上加用超滤治疗。超滤期间停用利尿剂,超滤结束后立即及24小时后静脉注射呋塞米(40mg)。收集包括性别、年龄、合并疾病、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级等临床资料。有效性指标包括尿量(使用利尿剂后的首个12小时和24小时尿量以及第二个24小时尿量)、体重和呼吸困难严重程度评分。安全性指标包括干预前后的收缩压、血清肌酐、血清钠浓度、血钾浓度及死亡人数。对照组有2例患者在随机分组后因心力衰竭恶化死亡,本研究将其排除,最终分析146例患者(对照组72例,超滤组74例)。男性93例,年龄为(68.3±11.2)岁。超滤组与对照组患者在性别、年龄、体重病程、呼吸困难严重程度评分、NYHA功能分级Ⅲ/Ⅳ、双下肢重度水肿患者比例、合并疾病患者比例及基础用药方面均无显著差异(均>0.05)。使用利尿剂后,超滤组首个12小时、24小时及第二个24小时尿量均显著高于对照组(均<0.05)。超滤组超滤治疗后体重较干预前显著下降(<0.05)。与对照组相比,超滤组呼吸困难严重程度评分显著改善(<0.05)。超滤组与对照组患者干预前后的收缩压、血清肌酐、血清钠浓度、血钾浓度均无显著差异(均>0.05)。临床诊治期间,对照组有2例男性患者死亡,死亡原因是基础疾病加重合并急性心力衰竭及心源性休克。超滤组无死亡病例,超滤期间及超滤后均无明显临床不良事件发生。超滤治疗安全,可提高射血分数降低且利尿剂抵抗的心力衰竭患者的利尿剂敏感性。