Physical Effort Laboratory, Sports Centre, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Res Sports Med. 2022 Sep-Oct;30(5):554-565. doi: 10.1080/15438627.2021.1917405. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
This study aimed to compare the maximal and submaximal aerobic parameters between two incremental running tests, one being horizontal and the other an incline-based test, namely the incline incremental running test (IIRT). Twenty endurance-trained trail runners completed two incremental treadmill tests, until exhaustion. The first test was performed using an incline of 1%, with speed increments. Then, the IIRT was performed with the speed set at 50% of the peak speed obtained during the previous test, and the incline was incremented. Cardiorespiratory measurements and blood lactate concentration ([La]) were assessed. The mean peak workload from the horizontal test was 17.6 ± 1.4 km.h and peak workload from IIRT was 17.3 ± 1.3% of incline. The VOpeak and [La]peak were not significantly different between the protocols. However, the HRpeak was significantly lower at IIRT. In conclusion, most of the maximal and submaximal aerobic indices showed no differences between the incremental tests analysed. The exceptions were the HRpeak and HR at the lactate turnpoints, that were lower, and the peak O pulse that was greater for the IIRT. Taken together, these data support the validity of the IIRT as a specific test for the physiological assessment of runners involved with uphill performances.
本研究旨在比较两种递增跑测试(水平测试和倾斜度递增跑测试)的最大和次最大有氧参数。20 名耐力训练的越野跑运动员完成了两次递增跑步机测试,直至力竭。第一次测试采用 1%的倾斜度和速度递增。然后,以在前一次测试中获得的峰值速度的 50%设置速度,进行 IIRT,并逐渐增加倾斜度。评估心肺测量和血乳酸浓度([La])。水平测试的平均峰值工作负荷为 17.6±1.4km.h,而 IIRT 的峰值工作负荷为 17.3±1.3%的倾斜度。两种方案的 VOpeak 和 [La]peak 没有显著差异。然而,在 IIRT 时 HRpeak 显著降低。总之,分析的递增测试中,大多数最大和次最大有氧指数没有差异。例外的是 HRpeak 和乳酸转折点的 HR,以及 IIRT 时的最大摄氧量脉搏更高。综上所述,这些数据支持 IIRT 作为评估涉及上坡表现的跑步者生理评估的特定测试的有效性。