Suppr超能文献

使用透明牙套治疗时釉质邻面缩窄:数字化规划与 OrthoCAD 分析。

Enamel interproximal reduction during treatment with clear aligners: digital planning versus OrthoCAD analysis.

机构信息

Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2021 Apr 19;21(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01487-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the amount of interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) provided on ClinCheck software with the amount of IPR carried out by the orthodontist during treatment with clear aligners.

METHODS

30 subjects (14 males, 16 females; mean age of 24.53 ± 13.41 years) randomly recruited from the Invisalign account of the Department of Orthodontics at the University of Rome "Tor Vergata" from November 2018 to October 2019, were collected according to the following inclusion criteria: mild to moderate dento-alveolar discrepancy (1.5-6.5 mm); Class I canine and molar relationship; full permanent dentition (excluding third molars); both arches treated only using Comprehensive Package by Invisalign system; treatment plan including IPR. Pre- (T0) and post-treatment (T1) digital models (.stl files), created from an iTero scan, were collected from all selected patients. The OrthoCAD digital software was used to measure tooth mesiodistal width in upper and lower arches before (T0) and at the end of treatment (T1) before any refinement. The widest mesio-distal diameter was measured for each tooth excluding molars by "Diagnostic" OrthoCAD tool. The total amount of IPR performed during treatment was obtained comparing the sum of mesio-distal widths of all measured teeth at T0 and T1. Significant T1-T0 differences were tested with dependent sample t-test (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

In the upper arch, IPR was digitally planned on average for 0.62 mm while in the lower arch was on average for 1.92 mm. As for the amount of enamel actually removed after IPR performing, it was on average 0.62 mm in the maxillary arch. In the mandibular arch, the mean of IPR carried out was 1.93 mm. The difference between planned IPR and performed IPR is described: this difference was on average 0.00 mm in the upper arch and 0.01 in the lower arch.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of enamel removed in vivo corresponded with the amount of IPR planned by the Orthodontist using ClinCheck software.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较 ClinCheck 软件中提供的近中釉质减少量(IPR)与正畸医生在使用透明牙套治疗时实际进行的 IPR 量。

方法

2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 10 月,从罗马“Tor Vergata”大学正畸系的 Invisalign 账户中随机招募了 30 名受试者(14 名男性,16 名女性;平均年龄 24.53±13.41 岁),入选标准如下:轻度至中度牙牙槽突不调(1.5-6.5mm);I 类尖牙和磨牙关系;恒牙列完整(不包括第三磨牙);仅使用 Invisalign 系统的综合包治疗两个弓;治疗计划包括 IPR。从所有入选患者中收集治疗前(T0)和治疗后(T1)的数字模型(.stl 文件),这些模型是由 iTero 扫描创建的。使用 OrthoCAD 数字软件在任何细化之前测量上下牙弓的牙近远中宽度。使用“Diagnostic”OrthoCAD 工具测量每个牙齿(不包括磨牙)的最宽近远中直径。通过比较 T0 和 T1 时所有测量牙齿的近远中宽度之和,获得治疗过程中实际进行的 IPR 总量。使用配对样本 t 检验(P<0.05)检验 T1-T0 差异是否具有统计学意义。

结果

在上颌弓中,平均数字化计划 IPR 量为 0.62mm,而在下颌弓中,平均 IPR 量为 1.92mm。至于 IPR 后实际去除的釉质量,上颌弓平均为 0.62mm。在下颌弓中,进行的 IPR 平均量为 1.93mm。计划的 IPR 与实际进行的 IPR 之间的差异描述如下:在上颌弓中,平均差异为 0.00mm,在下颌弓中为 0.01mm。

结论

体内去除的釉质量与正畸医生使用 ClinCheck 软件计划的 IPR 量相符。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4429/8056583/10cc19c55a96/12903_2021_1487_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验