Suppr超能文献

两种不同治疗方案中的垂直距离控制:隐适美早期矫治器和咬合板——一项回顾性研究

Vertical Dimension Control in Two Different Treatment Protocols: Invisalign First and Bite Block-A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Laganà Giuseppina, Malara Arianna, Palmacci Daniel, Bollero Patrizio, Cozza Paola

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Unicamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Via di Sant'Alessandro, 8, 00131 Rome, Italy.

Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;11(10):1252. doi: 10.3390/children11101252.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare the vertical dimension changes, before and after treatment, in two groups of growing patients, one group treated with clear aligner therapy versus a group treated with Quad-helix and bite-block therapy.

METHODS

The studied sample was composed of n. 40 patients (20 females and 20 males with a mean age of 8.6 ± 1.8 years), enrolled from the Department of Orthodontics at Policlinico of Rome Tor Vergata. The original sample was randomly divided into two groups: Group IF (Invisalign First) and Group BB (Quad-helix and bite block). Pre- (T0) and post-treatment (T1 after 12 months) lateral cephalograms were collected from all the selected patients. Nine cephalometric parameters, both angular and linear, were measured and recorded for each cephalogram.

RESULTS

No statistically significant changes were found between both the IF and BB groups at T0, while statistically significant changes were observed in both groups (BB and IF) between T0 and T1 (after 12 months of active therapy), < 0.005.

CONCLUSIONS

Both therapies were able to control the patient's vertical condition. To date, the use of conventional appliances seems to have slightly better efficacy in controlling the vertical dimension than aligner therapy.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较两组正在生长发育的患者在治疗前后的垂直维度变化,一组采用透明矫治器治疗,另一组采用四螺旋扩弓器和咬合板治疗。

方法

研究样本由40名患者组成(20名女性和20名男性,平均年龄8.6±1.8岁),来自罗马第二大学综合医院正畸科。原始样本被随机分为两组:IF组(Invisalign First)和BB组(四螺旋扩弓器和咬合板)。从所有选定患者中收集治疗前(T0)和治疗后(12个月后的T1)的头颅侧位片。对每张头颅侧位片测量并记录9个头颅测量参数,包括角度和线性参数。

结果

在T0时,IF组和BB组之间未发现统计学上的显著变化,而在T0和T1之间(积极治疗12个月后)两组(BB组和IF组)均观察到统计学上的显著变化,<0.005。

结论

两种治疗方法都能够控制患者的垂直情况。迄今为止,传统矫治器在控制垂直维度方面似乎比矫治器治疗具有稍好的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bdc9/11506737/c83948a961c4/children-11-01252-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验