Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824;
Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 27;118(17). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020935118.
Ecological restoration is a global priority, with potential to reverse biodiversity declines and promote ecosystem functioning. Yet, successful restoration is challenged by lingering legacies of past land-use activities, which are pervasive on lands available for restoration. Although legacies can persist for centuries following cessation of human land uses such as agriculture, we currently lack understanding of how land-use legacies affect entire ecosystems, how they influence restoration outcomes, or whether restoration can mitigate legacy effects. Using a large-scale experiment, we evaluated how restoration by tree thinning and land-use legacies from prior cultivation and subsequent conversion to pine plantations affect fire-suppressed longleaf pine savannas. We evaluated 45 ecological properties across four categories: 1) abiotic attributes, 2) organism abundances, 3) species diversity, and 4) species interactions. The effects of restoration and land-use legacies were pervasive, shaping all categories of properties, with restoration effects roughly twice the magnitude of legacy effects. Restoration effects were of comparable magnitude in savannas with and without a history of intensive human land use; however, restoration did not mitigate numerous legacy effects present prior to restoration. As a result, savannas with a history of intensive human land use supported altered properties, especially related to soils, even after restoration. The signature of past human land-use activities can be remarkably persistent in the face of intensive restoration, influencing the outcome of restoration across diverse ecological properties. Understanding and mitigating land-use legacies will maximize the potential to restore degraded ecosystems.
生态恢复是全球优先事项,具有逆转生物多样性下降和促进生态系统功能的潜力。然而,成功的恢复受到过去土地利用活动遗留问题的挑战,这些遗留问题在可用于恢复的土地上普遍存在。尽管在人类停止农业等土地利用活动后,土地利用遗留问题可能会持续数百年,但我们目前还不了解土地利用遗留问题如何影响整个生态系统,它们如何影响恢复结果,或者恢复是否可以减轻遗留问题的影响。我们使用大规模实验评估了通过树木疏伐和先前的耕作以及随后转换为松林种植园的土地利用遗留问题进行的恢复如何影响受火灾抑制的长叶松稀树草原。我们评估了四个类别中的 45 个生态属性:1)非生物属性,2)生物丰度,3)物种多样性和 4)物种相互作用。恢复和土地利用遗留问题的影响是普遍的,塑造了所有属性类别,其中恢复效应的大小约为遗留效应的两倍。在有无人类土地利用历史的稀树草原中,恢复效应的大小相当;然而,在恢复之前存在的许多遗留效应并未得到缓解。因此,尽管经过了密集的恢复,但是在过去有过密集人类土地利用历史的稀树草原中,土壤等相关属性仍保持着改变后的状态。过去人类土地利用活动的痕迹在面对密集的恢复时可能会非常持久,会影响到各种生态属性的恢复结果。了解和减轻土地利用遗留问题将最大限度地提高恢复退化生态系统的潜力。