Mahgerefteh Joseph, Lai Wyman, Colan Steven, Trachtenberg Felicia, Gongwer Russel, Stylianou Mario, Bhat Aarti H, Goldberg David, McCrindle Brian, Frommelt Peter, Sachdeva Ritu, Shuplock Jacqueline Marie, Spurney Christopher, Troung Dongngan, Cnota James F, Camarda Joseph A, Levine Jami, Pignatelli Ricardo, Altmann Karen, van der Velde Mary, Thankavel Poonam Punjwani, Chowdhury Shahryar, Srivastava Shubhika, Johnson Tiffanie R, Lopez Leo
Children's Hospital at Montefiore, New York, NY, USA.
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Kravis Children's Hospital at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1201, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2021 Aug;42(6):1284-1292. doi: 10.1007/s00246-021-02609-x. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
Normalizing cardiovascular measurements for body size allows for comparison among children of different ages and for distinguishing pathologic changes from normal physiologic growth. Because of growing interest to use height for normalization, the aim of this study was to develop height-based normalization models and compare them to body surface area (BSA)-based normalization for aortic and left ventricular (LV) measurements. The study population consisted of healthy, non-obese children between 2 and 18 years of age enrolled in the Pediatric Heart Network Echo Z-Score Project. The echocardiographic study parameters included proximal aortic diameters at 3 locations, LV end-diastolic volume, and LV mass. Using the statistical methodology described in the original project, Z-scores based on height and BSA were determined for the study parameters and tested for any clinically significant relationships with age, sex, race, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI). Normalization models based on height versus BSA were compared among underweight, normal weight, and overweight (but not obese) children in the study population. Z-scores based on height and BSA were calculated for the 5 study parameters and revealed no clinically significant relationships with age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Normalization based on height resulted in lower Z-scores in the underweight group compared to the overweight group, whereas normalization based on BSA resulted in higher Z-scores in the underweight group compared to the overweight group. In other words, increasing BMI had an opposite effect on height-based Z-scores compared to BSA-based Z-scores. Allometric normalization based on height and BSA for aortic and LV sizes is feasible. However, height-based normalization results in higher cardiovascular Z-scores in heavier children, and BSA-based normalization results in higher cardiovascular Z-scores in lighter children. Further studies are needed to assess the performance of these approaches in obese children with or without cardiac disease.
将心血管测量值按身体大小进行标准化,有助于不同年龄段儿童之间的比较,并区分病理变化与正常生理生长。由于人们越来越倾向于使用身高进行标准化,本研究旨在建立基于身高的标准化模型,并将其与基于体表面积(BSA)的主动脉和左心室(LV)测量标准化模型进行比较。研究人群包括参加儿科心脏网络超声Z评分项目的2至18岁健康、非肥胖儿童。超声心动图研究参数包括3个位置的主动脉近端直径、左心室舒张末期容积和左心室质量。使用原始项目中描述的统计方法,确定研究参数基于身高和BSA的Z评分,并测试其与年龄、性别、种族、民族和体重指数(BMI)的任何临床显著关系。在研究人群中,对体重过轻、正常体重和超重(但非肥胖)儿童的身高与BSA标准化模型进行了比较。计算了5个研究参数基于身高和BSA的Z评分,结果显示其与年龄、性别、种族和民族无临床显著关系。与超重组相比,基于身高的标准化在体重过轻组中导致较低的Z评分,而基于BSA的标准化在体重过轻组中导致较高的Z评分。换句话说,与基于BSA的Z评分相比,BMI增加对基于身高的Z评分有相反的影响。基于身高和BSA对主动脉和左心室大小进行异速生长标准化是可行的。然而,基于身高的标准化在较重儿童中导致较高的心血管Z评分,而基于BSA的标准化在较轻儿童中导致较高的心血管Z评分。需要进一步研究来评估这些方法在有或没有心脏病的肥胖儿童中的表现。