• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PD-1/PD-L1 免疫疗法治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性比较:一项网络荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies for non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Apr;25(7):2866-2884. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202104_25541.

DOI:10.26355/eurrev_202104_25541
PMID:33877652
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are a relatively new class of immunotherapeutic drugs approved for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to conduct a network meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of these immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used Bayesian network meta-analysis methods to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the included treatments. We further analyzed subgroups based on PD-L1 expression level, histology type, and line of the treatment setting.

RESULTS

We identified 19 RCTs, including 12,753 patients. In the analysis of all-comers, the pembrolizumab/chemotherapy combination ranked best for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Durvalumab was the only ICI treatment that showed no benefit over chemotherapy. In the first-line setting only, in terms of OS, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab/chemotherapy, and nivolumab/ipilimumab ranked as the best treatments for patients with PD-L1 expression levels of ≥50%, 1-49%, and <1%, respectively. Nivolumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, and durvalumab all had lower odds of grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) compared to chemotherapy. With the addition of chemotherapy to any ICI regimen, the odds of TRAEs increased in a considerable and statistically significant way.

CONCLUSIONS

While the pembrolizumab/chemotherapy combination was the most effective therapy in the overall cohort of all-comers, treatment preferences varied by treatment-line setting, tumor characteristics, and outcome of interest. In the first-line setting, the most effective treatments for patients with PD-L1 expressions of ≥50%, 1-49%, and <1% were atezolizumab, pembrolizumab/chemotherapy, and nivolumab/ipilimumab, respectively.

摘要

目的

PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂是一类新的免疫治疗药物,已被批准用于晚期非小细胞肺癌。本研究旨在进行网络荟萃分析,比较这些免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的安全性和疗效。

材料和方法

我们使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析方法评估纳入治疗的疗效和安全性。我们进一步根据 PD-L1 表达水平、组织学类型和治疗线进行亚组分析。

结果

我们确定了 19 项 RCT,共纳入 12753 名患者。在所有患者分析中,pembrolizumab/化疗联合治疗在总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)方面表现最佳。度伐利尤单抗是唯一一种与化疗相比没有获益的 ICI 治疗药物。仅在一线治疗中,在 OS 方面,对于 PD-L1 表达水平≥50%、1-49%和<1%的患者,atezolizumab、pembrolizumab/化疗和 nivolumab/ipilimumab 分别为最佳治疗药物。与化疗相比,nivolumab、atezolizumab、pembrolizumab 和 durvalumab 发生 3 级或更高级别的治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)的可能性更低。在任何 ICI 方案中添加化疗,TRAEs 的发生几率会显著增加。

结论

虽然 pembrolizumab/化疗联合治疗在所有患者的总体队列中是最有效的治疗方法,但治疗偏好因治疗线设置、肿瘤特征和关注的结局而异。在一线治疗中,对于 PD-L1 表达水平≥50%、1-49%和<1%的患者,最有效的治疗药物分别为 atezolizumab、pembrolizumab/化疗和 nivolumab/ipilimumab。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies for non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.PD-1/PD-L1 免疫疗法治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性比较:一项网络荟萃分析。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Apr;25(7):2866-2884. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202104_25541.
2
Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.比较单药或联合免疫检查点抑制剂与一线含或不含贝伐珠单抗的铂类化疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 30;4(4):CD013257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013257.pub3.
3
Single or combined immune checkpoint inhibitors compared to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.比较单药或联合免疫检查点抑制剂与含或不含贝伐珠单抗的一线含铂化疗方案用于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 14;12(12):CD013257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013257.pub2.
4
Immune checkpoint inhibitors, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A systematic review and network meta-analysis.免疫检查点抑制剂作为一线治疗方案,单独或联合化疗用于晚期非小细胞肺癌:一项系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lung Cancer. 2019 Aug;134:127-140. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 May 30.
5
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Single and Double Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based First-Line Treatments for Advanced Driver-Gene Wild-Type Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.比较单药和双免疫检查点抑制剂一线治疗晚期驱动基因野生型非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2021 Aug 16;12:731546. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.731546. eCollection 2021.
6
Efficacy and safety of first-line checkpoint inhibitors-based treatments for non-oncogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.一线检查点抑制剂治疗非致癌基因成瘾性非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
ESMO Open. 2022 Jun;7(3):100465. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100465. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
7
Comparison of efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较 PD-1/PD-L1 联合疗法在晚期 NSCLC 一线治疗中的疗效和安全性:一项更新的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Oct;26(10):2488-2502. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03442-3. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
8
Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in combination with chemotherapy or not as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗 PD-1/PD-L1 联合或不联合化疗作为晚期非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Feb;13(3):322-337. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14244. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
9
Long-term comparative efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab relative to other first-line therapies for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗对比其他晚期非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的长期疗效和安全性的系统文献评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lung Cancer. 2023 Mar;177:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
10
Determining the optimal PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for the first-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer with high-level PD-L1 expression in China.在中国,对于高 PD-L1 表达的非小细胞肺癌患者,确定最佳的 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂作为一线治疗药物。
Cancer Med. 2021 Sep;10(18):6344-6353. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4191. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Pretreatment CT Texture Analysis for Predicting Survival Outcomes in Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.治疗前CT纹理分析对接受免疫治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者生存结局的预测:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Thorac Cancer. 2025 Aug;16(15):e70144. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.70144.
2
A Comprehensive Review About the Use of Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer Therapy.关于单克隆抗体在癌症治疗中应用的综合综述。
Antibodies (Basel). 2025 Apr 11;14(2):35. doi: 10.3390/antib14020035.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety of first‑line PD‑1/PD‑L1 inhibitors in immunotherapy for non‑small cell lung cancer: A network meta‑analysis.
一线PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂在非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗中的疗效和安全性比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Oncol Lett. 2025 Jan 23;29(3):157. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.14903. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Feasibility and Tolerability of Anlotinib Plus PD-1 Inhibitors for Previously-Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Exploratory Study.安罗替尼联合PD-1抑制剂用于既往治疗过的晚期非小细胞肺癌的可行性和耐受性:一项回顾性探索性研究
Biologics. 2024 Nov 5;18:313-326. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S489363. eCollection 2024.
5
First-line immunotherapy efficacy in advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 expression ≥50%: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.程序性死亡受体-1(PD-L1)表达≥50%的晚期鳞状非小细胞肺癌的一线免疫治疗疗效:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 24;14:1365255. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1365255. eCollection 2024.
6
Single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing data jointly reveals s impacts on prognosis and immune landscape of NSCLC.单细胞和批量 RNA 测序数据联合揭示了 s 对 NSCLC 预后和免疫景观的影响。
Aging (Albany NY). 2024 Feb 20;16(4):3160-3184. doi: 10.18632/aging.205517.
7
Cell adhesion molecules and immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Current process and potential application.晚期非小细胞肺癌中的细胞粘附分子与免疫治疗:当前进展与潜在应用
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 21;13:1107631. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1107631. eCollection 2023.
8
Tumor regression rate, PD-L1 expression, pembrolizumab/nab-paclitaxel-based regimens, squamous cell carcinoma, and comorbidities were independently associated with efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.肿瘤退缩率、程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)表达、基于帕博利珠单抗/白蛋白结合型紫杉醇的治疗方案、鳞状细胞癌和合并症与非小细胞肺癌新辅助化疗免疫治疗的疗效独立相关。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 27;12:1057646. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1057646. eCollection 2022.
9
Clinical and Biological Variables Influencing Outcome in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treated with Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Antibodies: A Prospective Multicentre Study.影响接受抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者预后的临床和生物学变量:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 24;12(5):679. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050679.
10
Efficacy and safety of first-line checkpoint inhibitors-based treatments for non-oncogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.一线检查点抑制剂治疗非致癌基因成瘾性非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
ESMO Open. 2022 Jun;7(3):100465. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100465. Epub 2022 Apr 12.