• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响居民垃圾分类意愿和行为的因素:基于 TPB 和 A-B-C 方法的研究。

Determinants affecting residents' waste classification intention and behavior: A study based on TPB and A-B-C methodology.

机构信息

Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, 611756, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, 611756, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 15;290:112591. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112591. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112591
PMID:33878629
Abstract

Waste classification is regarded as one of the most important strategies for waste management, and its success depends on the active participation of the public. Based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and attitude-behavior-condition (A-B-C) theory, this research investigated the key factors affecting residents' domestic waste classification intention (WCI) and waste classification behavior (WCB), and explored the moderating effects of three external factors including infrastructure (INF), government publicity (GP), and incentive measures (IM) on the intention-behavior relationship. The valid data were collected from 584 residents via conducting a face-to-face interview in Chengdu, a pilot city of waste classification in China, and analyzed by using the structural equation model (SEM). Results showed that residents' WCI and WCB had a significant discrepancy with the average values of 4.07 and 2.81, respectively. Attitude (AT), perceived behavior control (PBC) and classification knowledge (CK) were significantly related to residents' WCI, with AT (β = 0.65, P < 0.001) having the greatest direct impact. Meanwhile, CK and INF had a stronger impact on the WCB than WCI. GP indirectly affected WCB through the intermediary effect of CK. In addition, INF and GP had a positively moderating effect on residents' waste classification intention-behavior relationship and can facilitate the intention-behavior conversion. By contrast, IM failed to promote the conversion of residents' classification intention into behavior, and had no direct significant influence on residents' WCB. Finally, some relevant policy suggestions were put forward for the new pilot cities of waste classification in China.

摘要

垃圾分类被视为废物管理的最重要策略之一,其成功与否取决于公众的积极参与。本研究基于计划行为理论(TPB)和态度-行为-条件(A-B-C)理论,调查了影响居民生活垃圾分类意愿(WCI)和垃圾分类行为(WCB)的关键因素,并探讨了基础设施(INF)、政府宣传(GP)和激励措施(IM)三个外部因素对意图-行为关系的调节作用。通过在中国垃圾分类试点城市成都进行面对面访谈,从 584 名居民那里收集了有效数据,并采用结构方程模型(SEM)进行分析。结果表明,居民的 WCI 和 WCB 与平均值 4.07 和 2.81 存在显著差异。态度(AT)、感知行为控制(PBC)和分类知识(CK)与居民的 WCI 显著相关,其中 AT(β=0.65,P<0.001)的直接影响最大。同时,CK 和 INF 对 WCB 的影响大于 WCI。GP 通过 CK 的中介效应间接影响 WCB。此外,INF 和 GP 对居民垃圾分类意愿-行为关系具有积极的调节作用,可以促进意愿-行为的转化。相比之下,IM 未能促进居民分类意愿向行为的转化,对居民的 WCB 没有直接显著影响。最后,针对中国新的垃圾分类试点城市提出了一些相关的政策建议。

相似文献

1
Determinants affecting residents' waste classification intention and behavior: A study based on TPB and A-B-C methodology.影响居民垃圾分类意愿和行为的因素:基于 TPB 和 A-B-C 方法的研究。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 15;290:112591. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112591. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
2
From intention to behavior: Comprehending residents' waste sorting intention and behavior formation process.从意图到行为:理解居民垃圾分类意图和行为形成过程。
Waste Manag. 2020 Jul 15;113:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.031. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
Identifying the influencing factors and constructing incentive pattern of residents' waste classification behavior using PCA-logistic regression.利用 PCA-logistic 回归识别居民垃圾分类行为的影响因素并构建激励模式。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(7):17149-17165. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23363-4. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
4
Linking Perceived Policy Effectiveness and Proenvironmental Behavior: The Influence of Attitude, Implementation Intention, and Knowledge.感知政策有效性与亲环境行为的关系:态度、实施意愿和知识的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 12;18(6):2910. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062910.
5
Domestic Waste Classification Behavior and Its Deviation from Willingness: Evidence from a Random Household Survey in Beijing.居民生活垃圾分类行为及其与意愿的偏离——来自北京市随机家庭入户调查的证据
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 9;19(22):14718. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214718.
6
Determinants and the Moderating Effect of Perceived Policy Effectiveness on Residents' Separation Intention for Rural Household Solid Waste.居民对农村户用生活垃圾分类意愿的决定因素及感知政策有效性的调节作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 11;15(4):726. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040726.
7
A comparative study of factors influencing residents' waste sorting behavior in urban and rural areas of China.中国城乡居民垃圾分类行为影响因素的比较研究
Heliyon. 2024 May 1;10(9):e30591. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30591. eCollection 2024 May 15.
8
The Mechanism of Household Waste Sorting Behaviour-A Study of Jiaxing, China.《家庭垃圾分类行为机制——以中国嘉兴为例的研究》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 20;19(4):2447. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042447.
9
Evolution of community residents' waste classification behavior based on multi-agent simulation.基于多主体模拟的社区居民垃圾分类行为演变。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2022 Dec;72(12):1398-1409. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2022.2108932. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
10
The impact of social network embeddedness, TPB, and danwei system on residents' participation intention in old neighborhood regeneration.社会网络嵌入、计划行为理论和单位制对居民参与老旧小区改造意愿的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 14;14(1):18920. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69931-1.

引用本文的文献

1
HGCS-Det: A Deep Learning-Based Solution for Localizing and Recognizing Household Garbage in Complex Scenarios.HGCS-Det:一种基于深度学习的复杂场景下家庭垃圾定位与识别解决方案。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jun 14;25(12):3726. doi: 10.3390/s25123726.
2
Rural labor migration and household waste separation willingness: Evidence from 6849 rural residents in China.农村劳动力迁移与家庭垃圾分类意愿:来自中国6849名农村居民的证据
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0321459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321459. eCollection 2025.
3
Driving factors of pro-environmental behavior among rural tourism destination residents-considering the moderating effect of environmental policies.
乡村旅游目的地居民亲环境行为的驱动因素——考虑环境政策的调节作用
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7663. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92457-z.
4
The impact of social networks on rural residents' engagement in living environment upgrade: An integrated analysis drawing on social network theory and the theory of planned behavior.社交网络对农村居民参与生活环境改善的影响:基于社交网络理论和计划行为理论的综合分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 22;20(1):e0312779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312779. eCollection 2025.
5
Factors influencing civil servants' willingness to implement cardiopulmonary resuscitation in Chongqing, China: Based on the theory of planned behavior.影响中国重庆公务员实施心肺复苏意愿的因素:基于计划行为理论
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 24;10(9):e29803. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29803. eCollection 2024 May 15.
6
In-depth analysis to develop a social marketing model to promote women's participation in waste segregation behaviour: A qualitative study.深入分析以构建促进女性参与垃圾分类行为的社会营销模式:一项定性研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 23;10(7):e28690. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28690. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
7
Impact of social-psychological factors on low-carbon travel intention: Merging theory of planned behavior and value-belief-norm theory.社会心理因素对低碳出行意愿的影响:整合计划行为理论与价值-信念-规范理论
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 21;10(6):e28161. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28161. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
8
How does abstract and concrete garbage classification signage influence waste sorting behavior?垃圾分类标识的抽象与具体如何影响垃圾分类行为?
PeerJ. 2023 Dec 5;11:e16597. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16597. eCollection 2023.
9
Analysis of the influence of the COVID-19 outbreak on household solid waste management: An empirical study using PLS-SEM.分析 COVID-19 疫情对家庭固体废物管理的影响:基于 PLS-SEM 的实证研究。
Sci Prog. 2023 Oct-Dec;106(4):368504231206254. doi: 10.1177/00368504231206254.
10
External Factors Impacting Residents' Participation in Waste Sorting Using NCA and fsQCA Methods on Pilot Cities in China.外部因素对中国试点城市居民参与垃圾分类的影响:基于 NCA 和 fsQCA 方法的研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054080.