• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国城乡居民垃圾分类行为影响因素的比较研究

A comparative study of factors influencing residents' waste sorting behavior in urban and rural areas of China.

作者信息

Zhang Shibin, Luo Yuzi, Zhang Pu

机构信息

School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, 250101, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 May 1;10(9):e30591. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30591. eCollection 2024 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30591
PMID:38756576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11096745/
Abstract

Extensive research has been conducted on the waste sorting behavior (WSB) of residents, while it is the first time that the classification behavior of urban and rural residents is compared under the same theoretical framework in China. Based on questionnaire data from 478 urban and rural residents, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to investigate the internal factors influencing the WSB by integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Norm Activation Model (NAM). Hierarchical regression analysis was utilized to investigate the moderating effect of external factors on the residents' intentions and behavior. The results show that the degree of deviation between rural residents' intentions and behavior is much larger than that of urban residents. Personal norms are the key factors affecting urban residents' waste sorting. In contrast, for rural residents, attitude is the most critical factor, but the influence of subjective norms is insignificant. In addition, we found that policy restraints and economic incentives significantly moderate the association between urban residents' sorting intention and behavior, with economic incentives having a better effect than policy restraints. In contrast, the impact of policy restraints on rural residents is better than that of urban areas. However, the moderating effect of economic incentives is insignificant for rural residents. The findings furnish the government with meaningful strategies to narrow the urban-rural waste management gap.

摘要

针对居民的垃圾分类行为已经开展了广泛研究,而在中国首次在相同理论框架下对城乡居民的分类行为进行比较。基于478名城乡居民的问卷数据,运用结构方程模型(SEM),通过整合计划行为理论(TPB)和规范激活模型(NAM)来探究影响垃圾分类行为的内部因素。利用层次回归分析来研究外部因素对居民意愿和行为的调节作用。结果表明,农村居民意愿与行为之间的偏差程度远大于城市居民。个人规范是影响城市居民垃圾分类的关键因素。相比之下,对于农村居民来说,态度是最关键的因素,但主观规范的影响不显著。此外,我们发现政策约束和经济激励显著调节了城市居民分类意愿与行为之间的关联,经济激励的效果优于政策约束。相比之下,政策约束对农村居民的影响比城市地区更好。然而,经济激励对农村居民的调节作用不显著。这些研究结果为政府提供了缩小城乡垃圾管理差距的有意义策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1354/11096745/318aef1ccc30/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1354/11096745/3ea72afae12e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1354/11096745/7bf7bffce93f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1354/11096745/e7575a50d304/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1354/11096745/ccd630ab04a8/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1354/11096745/318aef1ccc30/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1354/11096745/3ea72afae12e/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1354/11096745/7bf7bffce93f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1354/11096745/e7575a50d304/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1354/11096745/ccd630ab04a8/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1354/11096745/318aef1ccc30/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative study of factors influencing residents' waste sorting behavior in urban and rural areas of China.中国城乡居民垃圾分类行为影响因素的比较研究
Heliyon. 2024 May 1;10(9):e30591. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30591. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
The Mechanism of Household Waste Sorting Behaviour-A Study of Jiaxing, China.《家庭垃圾分类行为机制——以中国嘉兴为例的研究》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 20;19(4):2447. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042447.
3
Investigating Rural Domestic Waste Sorting Intentions Based on an Integrative Framework of Planned Behavior Theory and Normative Activation Models: Evidence from Guanzhong Basin, China.基于计划行为理论和规范激活模型的农村户垃圾分类意愿研究——来自中国关中盆地的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 7;17(13):4887. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134887.
4
Determinants affecting residents' waste classification intention and behavior: A study based on TPB and A-B-C methodology.影响居民垃圾分类意愿和行为的因素:基于 TPB 和 A-B-C 方法的研究。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 15;290:112591. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112591. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
5
From intention to behavior: Comprehending residents' waste sorting intention and behavior formation process.从意图到行为:理解居民垃圾分类意图和行为形成过程。
Waste Manag. 2020 Jul 15;113:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.031. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
6
Exploring the Effect of Individual and Group Level Factors on the Level of Rural Residents' Domestic Waste Sorting: Evidence from Shaanxi, China.探究个体和群体因素对农村居民垃圾分类水平的影响:来自中国陕西的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;19(19):12022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912022.
7
Factors Influencing Young People's Intention toward Municipal Solid Waste Sorting.影响年轻人垃圾分类意愿的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 15;16(10):1708. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101708.
8
From intention to action: How do personal attitudes, facilities accessibility, and government stimulus matter for household waste sorting?从意图到行动:个人态度、设施可达性和政府激励如何影响家庭垃圾分类?
J Environ Manage. 2019 Mar 1;233:447-458. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.059. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
9
Determinants and the Moderating Effect of Perceived Policy Effectiveness on Residents' Separation Intention for Rural Household Solid Waste.居民对农村户用生活垃圾分类意愿的决定因素及感知政策有效性的调节作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 11;15(4):726. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040726.
10
The Role of Social Capital in Predicting Tourists' Waste Sorting Intentions in Rural Destinations: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior.社会资本在预测农村旅游目的地游客垃圾分类意愿中的作用:扩展计划行为理论。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 6;19(19):12789. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912789.

引用本文的文献

1
Rural labor migration and household waste separation willingness: Evidence from 6849 rural residents in China.农村劳动力迁移与家庭垃圾分类意愿:来自中国6849名农村居民的证据
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0321459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321459. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of contractor's construction and demolition waste recycling intention in China: Integrating theory of planned behavior and norm activation model.中国承包商建筑和拆除废物回收意愿的决定因素:计划行为理论和规范激活模型的整合。
Waste Manag. 2023 Apr 15;161:213-224. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
2
Evaluation of the household solid waste mandatory sorting policy in Shanghai: A 1-year public opinion survey.评价上海市生活垃圾强制分类政策:一项为期 1 年的公众意见调查。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Aug;41(8):1305-1317. doi: 10.1177/0734242X231155097. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
3
Identifying the influencing factors and constructing incentive pattern of residents' waste classification behavior using PCA-logistic regression.
利用 PCA-logistic 回归识别居民垃圾分类行为的影响因素并构建激励模式。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(7):17149-17165. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23363-4. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
4
Effects of perceived value on green consumption intention based on double-entry mental accounting: taking energy-efficient appliance purchase as an example.基于复式心理账户的感知价值对绿色消费意愿的影响——以节能家电购买为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Feb;28(6):7236-7248. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11027-0. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
From intention to action: How do personal attitudes, facilities accessibility, and government stimulus matter for household waste sorting?从意图到行动:个人态度、设施可达性和政府激励如何影响家庭垃圾分类?
J Environ Manage. 2019 Mar 1;233:447-458. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.059. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
6
Quantitative assessment of distance to collection point and improved sorting information on source separation of household waste.定量评估收集点的距离和改进源头分类的信息以提高家庭废物的分类。
Waste Manag. 2015 Jun;40:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
7
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.