Suppr超能文献

英国急诊科初级保健分流途径的分类:一项包括横断面调查、现场观察、半结构化和非正式访谈的多方法研究的结果。

A classification of primary care streaming pathways in UK emergency departments: Findings from a multi-methods study comprising cross-sectional survey; site visits with observations, semi-structured and informal interviews.

机构信息

Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.

Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 May;56:101000. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101000. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Variation in initial assessment methods at emergency departments in with primary care service models and a conflated terminology causes difficulties in assessing relative performance, improving quality or gathering evidence about safety and clinical effectiveness. We aim to describe and classify streaming pathways in emergency departments in different models of emergency department primary care services in England and Wales.

METHODS

We used a multi-stage method, including an online survey completed by 77 emergency departments across England & Wales, interviews with 21 clinical leads, and in-depth case studies of 13 emergency departments. All qualitative data were triangulated and analysed using a framework approach.

RESULTS

Common emergency department pathways to primary care services were: front door streaming; streaming inside the emergency department; or primary care staff selecting patients. Pathways were also in place to redirect patients with non-urgent primary care problems to community primary care services. Streaming and redirection pathways were often adapted, with variation in protocols based on local circumstances.

CONCLUSION

Clinical leads should consider which pathway(s) best suit their local context. Consistency of terminology used to describe pathways between emergency departments and primary care services is necessary for performance measurement, quality improvement and rigorous future multi-site evaluative and descriptive research.

摘要

背景

由于急诊科的初步评估方法与初级保健服务模式存在差异,且术语混淆,这给评估相对绩效、提高质量或收集关于安全性和临床效果的证据带来了困难。我们旨在描述和分类英格兰和威尔士不同急诊部初级保健服务模式下急诊科的分诊途径。

方法

我们使用了一种多阶段的方法,包括对英格兰和威尔士 77 家急诊科进行的在线调查、对 21 名临床负责人的访谈以及对 13 家急诊科的深入案例研究。所有定性数据均使用框架方法进行三角剖分和分析。

结果

常见的通往初级保健服务的急诊科途径有:前门分诊、在急诊科内部分诊、或初级保健人员选择患者。对于非紧急的初级保健问题,也有将患者转至社区初级保健服务的途径。分诊和转介途径通常会进行调整,具体方案会根据当地情况而有所不同。

结论

临床负责人应考虑哪种途径最适合其当地情况。急诊科和初级保健服务之间使用描述途径的术语应保持一致,这对于绩效衡量、质量改进以及未来严格的多地点评估和描述性研究是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验