Lai Z B, Zhu Y Z, Zou Y X, Zhang H N, Li X, Zhong D G, Yang K Y, Lai J H, Shen G D
The Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan 528000, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 20;101(15):1077-1082. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200828-02484.
To compare the clinical efficacy and the level of muscle and soft tissue damage between modified posteromedial approach via lateral side of flexor hallucis longus and modified posteromedial approach in the treatment of posterior Pilon fracture. Total of 43 patients (27 males and 16 females, aged from 19 to 71 years) diagnosed with posterior Pilon fracture from June 2016 to June 2018 in Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were randomly divided into observation group (modified posteromedial approach via lateral side of flexor hallucis longus, 21 cases) and control group (modified posteromedial approach, 22 cases) according to the operation approach. The preoperative waiting time, intraoperative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time and the complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The differences of blood creatine kinase (CK), myoglobin (Myo) and C-reactive protein (CRP) at different time points before and after operation were compared between the two groups to elevate the level of muscle and soft tissue damage. The fracture reduction qualities of the two groups were compared by Burwell-Charnley criteria. The differences of fracture healing time, range of motion of metatarsophalangeal joint of the great toe (MTP-ROM), ankle range of motion (Ankle-ROM), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pain were compared between the two groups at the last follow-up. The observation group and the control group were followed-up for (19±6) months and (16±8) months, respectively; there was no significant difference between the two groups (>0.05). There were no significant differences in preoperative waiting time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time and fracture healing time between the two groups (all >0.05). At the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the MTP-ROM and Ankle-ROM between the two groups (both >0.05); the AOFAS score of the observation group was 88.2±7.8 and it was 84.5±7.6 in the control group (>0.05); the VAS score of the observation group was (0.9±1.0) and it was (1.3±0.8) in the control group(>0.05). Anatomical reduction rate in observation group was higher than that in control group (90.5% vs 81.8%, >0.05). The operation time in the observation group was (87±16) min and it was (98±11) min in the control group (<0.05). CK, Myo and CRP were increased in both groups after surgery, but there was no statistical significance between groups at the same time point (all >0.05). There was no nerve injury in the observation group, while 2 cases (9.0%) of nerve paralysis occurred in the control group. No incision infection and checkrein deformity of the Hallux was found in the two groups. The modified posteromedial approach via lateral side of flexor hallucis longus can obtain good operative field exposure, and does not increase muscle and soft tissue injury, with shorter operative time and fewer complications, without nerve injury and checkrein deformity, it is a safe approach for the treatment of posterior Pilon fracture.
比较经拇长屈肌外侧缘改良后内侧入路与改良后内侧入路治疗Pilon后踝骨折的临床疗效及肌肉软组织损伤程度。选取2016年6月至2018年6月在佛山市中医院确诊为Pilon后踝骨折的43例患者(男27例,女16例,年龄19~71岁),根据手术入路随机分为观察组(经拇长屈肌外侧缘改良后内侧入路,21例)和对照组(改良后内侧入路,22例)。记录并比较两组患者术前等待时间、术中时间、术中出血量、住院时间及并发症情况。比较两组患者手术前后不同时间点血肌酸激酶(CK)、肌红蛋白(Myo)及C反应蛋白(CRP)水平以评估肌肉软组织损伤程度。采用Burwell-Charnley标准比较两组骨折复位质量。比较两组末次随访时骨折愈合时间、拇趾跖趾关节活动度(MTP-ROM)、踝关节活动度(Ankle-ROM)、美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)评分及视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分。观察组和对照组分别随访(19±6)个月和(16±8)个月,两组差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。两组患者术前等待时间、术中出血量、住院时间及骨折愈合时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(均>0.05)。末次随访时,两组患者MTP-ROM和Ankle-ROM比较,差异无统计学意义(均>0.05);观察组AOFAS评分为88.2±7.8,对照组为84.5±7.6,差异无统计学意义(>0.05);观察组VAS评分为(0.9±1.0),对照组为(1.3±0.8),差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。观察组解剖复位率高于对照组(90.5%比81.8%,>0.05)。观察组手术时间为(87±16)min,对照组为(98±11)min,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。两组术后CK、Myo及CRP均升高,但同一时间点两组间差异无统计学意义(均>0.05)。观察组无神经损伤,对照组发生2例(9.0%)神经麻痹。两组均未发现切口感染及拇趾屈曲畸形。经拇长屈肌外侧缘改良后内侧入路可获得良好的术野暴露,不增加肌肉软组织损伤,手术时间短,并发症少,无神经损伤及拇趾屈曲畸形,是治疗Pilon后踝骨折的一种安全入路。