Blomgren I, Blomqvist G, Ejeskär A, Fogdestam I, Volkman R, Edshage S
Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska Hospital, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1988;22(1):93-101. doi: 10.3109/02844318809097941.
Twenty-one patients with revascularized/replanted amputated parts of the upper limb were studied for an evaluation of hand function. Two patients had been injured at the lower arm to wrist level, four between the wrist and MCP joint, three distal to the MCP joints in thumbs and/or fingers, and twelve in the thumb only. Hand function was measured as grip and pinch strength, range of movement (ROM), sensibility (two point discrimination), and Sollerman test score. Cold sensitivity as related to circulatory changes in the replanted limb was evaluated in six patients using the critical opening test (COP). Twelve of 17 initiated replantations (71%), and 11 of 12 revascularizations (92%), were successful. Hand function was restricted in patients with amputations at the lower arm to wrist level, fair in replanted midhands, good, but with wide variations after replantations at the MCP or distal II-V fingers, and best of all in replanted thumbs. Sensibility was poor in a majority of the patients. Three out of six of the patients who were COP-tested had significantly reduced blood pressure in the replanted part. The test results (grip, ROM, Sollerman score) in three patients with amputated thumbs were not found to differ greatly from those with replanted thumbs. These results raise the question of whether the Sollerman test underestimates the importance of the thumb or whether the thumb is overestimated in hand function.
对21例上肢断肢再植/血管重建患者的手部功能进行了研究评估。2例患者损伤位于前臂至腕部水平,4例位于腕部与掌指关节之间,3例在拇指和/或手指的掌指关节远端,12例仅累及拇指。手部功能通过握力、捏力、活动范围(ROM)、感觉功能(两点辨别觉)以及索勒曼测试评分来衡量。采用临界开口试验(COP)对6例患者评估了与再植肢体循环变化相关的冷敏感性。17例初始再植患者中有12例(71%)成功,12例血管重建患者中有11例(92%)成功。前臂至腕部水平截肢患者的手部功能受限,再植中手部功能一般,掌指关节或示指至小指远端再植后手部功能良好但差异较大,而拇指再植后的手部功能最佳。大多数患者的感觉功能较差。接受COP测试的6例患者中有3例再植部位血压显著降低。3例拇指截肢患者的测试结果(握力、ROM、索勒曼评分)与拇指再植患者相比差异不大。这些结果引发了一个问题,即索勒曼测试是否低估了拇指的重要性,或者在手部功能中拇指是否被高估了。