Suppr超能文献

经皮神经电刺激联合关节松动术的镇痛效果:一项随机临床试验。

Hypoalgesic Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Combined With Joint Manipulation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Catholic Salesian University Center Auxilium - Lins, São Paulo, Brazil.

Federal University of São Carlos-UFSCar, São Carlos/São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Mar;44(3):244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.09.004. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the hypoalgesic effects of isolated or combined use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and cervical joint manipulation (JM) in asymptomatic participants.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-four healthy participants aged 18 to 30 years old were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups (n = 36 per group): active TENS + active JM, active TENS + placebo JM, placebo TENS + active JM, and placebo TENS + placebo JM. Active or placebo TENS was applied to the dominant forearm. JM was applied to the C6-7 segments. The pressure pain threshold was measured pre- and postintervention and after 20 minutes on the forearm and tibialis anterior of the dominant side.

RESULTS

Segmental hypoalgesia was greater in the group active TENS + active JM compared with active TENS + placebo JM (P = .002), placebo TENS + active JM (P < .0001), and placebo TENS + placebo JM (P < .0001). For the extrasegmental hypoalgesia, active TENS + active JM had greater hypoalgesic effect compared with active TENS + placebo JM (P = .033), placebo TENS + active JM (P = .002), and placebo TENS + placebo JM (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

TENS and JM produced hypoalgesia when used alone and, when the treatments were combined, a higher segmental and extrasegmental hypoalgesic effect was obtained in asymptomatic participants.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经皮神经电刺激(TENS)和颈椎关节手法(JM)单独或联合使用在无症状参与者中的镇痛效果。

方法

144 名年龄在 18 至 30 岁之间的健康参与者被随机分配到 4 组中的 1 组(每组 36 人):主动 TENS+主动 JM、主动 TENS+安慰剂 JM、安慰剂 TENS+主动 JM 和安慰剂 TENS+安慰剂 JM。主动或安慰剂 TENS 应用于优势前臂。JM 应用于 C6-7 节段。在干预前、干预后以及优势侧前臂和胫骨前肌 20 分钟后测量压力疼痛阈值。

结果

与主动 TENS+安慰剂 JM(P=.002)、安慰剂 TENS+主动 JM(P<.0001)和安慰剂 TENS+安慰剂 JM(P<.0001)相比,主动 TENS+主动 JM 组的节段性镇痛作用更大。对于节外镇痛,主动 TENS+主动 JM 与主动 TENS+安慰剂 JM(P=.033)、安慰剂 TENS+主动 JM(P=.002)和安慰剂 TENS+安慰剂 JM(P<.0001)相比,镇痛效果更大。

结论

TENS 和 JM 单独使用时可产生镇痛作用,当联合使用时,在无症状参与者中可获得更高的节段性和节外镇痛效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验