Multistage evaluation scale, differential threshold steps and equivalent sensation contours of respiratory flow-resistive load sensation.

This paper presents and discusses the methodology and results of studies on respiratory sensation by using a fuzzy set category judgement model and applying the concept of just noticeable difference (JND) step and equivalent sensation. A new kind of category scale, the multistage evaluation scale (MES), based on a fuzzy set category judgement model for quantifying respiratory sensory magnitude has been put forward and verified in 37 subjects. The perceived magnitude of added resistance estimated using MES could reflect properly the difference in sensory perception caused by added loads with equal intensity but applied to different phases of the breathing cycle. In addition, the psychophysical function obtained conforms to the Stevens' power law. On the contrary, the classical category scale does not possess some of these attributes. In 9 subjects, we determined that the sensory continuum corresponding to either inspiratory or expiratory added resistive load, ranging 10-500 mm H2O.1(-1).s, consisted of 6 or 7 JND steps. The sensory magnitude corresponding to each step was estimated by the MES. Relating the results of JND step measurements with that of magnitude estimation using MES, we could elucidate systematically the relationship between perceived magnitude and discrimination for respiratory sensation. In 13 subjects, the equivalent respiratory resistive load sensation contours of 2, 3 and 4 JND step above basal level, respectively, were obtained through experimentation and by quadratic polynomial approximation of experimental data. The results suggest that as regards the human tolerance to various added resistive loads the combined resistive load is the most tolerable among the three; the expiratory, the least. The equivalent sensation contour can be used to predict the changes in respiratory sensation determined by both the intensity of the total added load and the ratio of inspiratory versus expiratory load. In brief, we have proposed a new way to elucidate the physiological and psychophysical effects of various added resistive loads.